Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*nfsd\s+lockups\s+with\s+xfs\s+during\s+SPEC\s+SFS\s+testing\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. RE: nfsd lockups with xfs during SPEC SFS testing (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 01 Feb 2002 11:34:52 -0600
Are you using anything unusual as the block device here? I would be suspicious of it not coming back with I/O completions. Basically all the places threads are waiting are places we wait blocked for
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00009.html (9,297 bytes)

2. tch (score: 1)
Author: "HABBINGA,ERIK (HP-Loveland,ex1)" <erik_habbinga@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 11:32:33 -0800
Steve + crew, Here's the latest list of our lockups during SPEC SFS NFS testing. Two consecutive tests locked up in lock_wait, either through mraccessf or mrupdatef. What are these functions trying t
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00374.html (11,960 bytes)

3. xfs (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: 01 Feb 2002 11:34:52 -0600
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00583.html (9,297 bytes)

4. a patch (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 11:32:33 -0800
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00948.html (11,960 bytes)

5. (recovery) (score: 1)
Author: <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 12:59:03 -0500
I'm running linux 2.4.17 with a version of XFS downloaded via CVS on Jan 30th. When I run the SPEC SFS NFS test against this kernel, nfsd stops responding after awhile. I captured the state of all of
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00898.html (10,550 bytes)

6. take? (score: 1)
Author: deen@xxxxxxx>
Date: 31 Jan 2002 16:16:05 -0600
Is this a regression, i.e. did it used to work? And can you say when on the 30th? Thanks Steve -- Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511 Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software email: lord@xxxxxxx
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00914.html (8,822 bytes)

7. [NEWS] Extended attributes interface changes (score: 1)
Author: s@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 14:38:46 -0800
A co-worker of mine sent me a patch containing the CVS bits at 3:21pm Mountain time 1/30/02, he started the CVS download at 2:37pm Mountain time 1/30/02 and ended it at 2:38pm Mountain time 1/30/02.
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00918.html (10,780 bytes)

8. GFP_KERNEL more (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 12:59:03 -0500
I'm running linux 2.4.17 with a version of XFS downloaded via CVS on Jan 30th. When I run the SPEC SFS NFS test against this kernel, nfsd stops responding after awhile. I captured the state of all of
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01827.html (10,550 bytes)

9. reeze take? (score: 1)
Author: c Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: 31 Jan 2002 16:16:05 -0600
Is this a regression, i.e. did it used to work? And can you say when on the 30th? Thanks Steve -- Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511 Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software email: lord@xxxxxxx
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01843.html (8,822 bytes)

10. face changes (score: 1)
Author: imits" <stimits@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 14:38:46 -0800
A co-worker of mine sent me a patch containing the CVS bits at 3:21pm Mountain time 1/30/02, he started the CVS download at 2:37pm Mountain time 1/30/02 and ended it at 2:38pm Mountain time 1/30/02.
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01847.html (10,780 bytes)

11. RE: nfsd lockups with xfs during SPEC SFS testing (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 01 Feb 2002 11:34:52 -0600
Are you using anything unusual as the block device here? I would be suspicious of it not coming back with I/O completions. Basically all the places threads are waiting are places we wait blocked for
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01157.html (9,449 bytes)

12. RE: nfsd lockups with xfs during SPEC SFS testing (score: 1)
Author: "HABBINGA,ERIK (HP-Loveland,ex1)" <erik_habbinga@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 11:32:33 -0800
Steve + crew, Here's the latest list of our lockups during SPEC SFS NFS testing. Two consecutive tests locked up in lock_wait, either through mraccessf or mrupdatef. What are these functions trying t
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01522.html (11,960 bytes)

13. nfsd lockups with xfs during SPEC SFS testing (score: 1)
Author: "HABBINGA,ERIK (HP-Loveland,ex1)" <erik_habbinga@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 12:59:03 -0500
I'm running linux 2.4.17 with a version of XFS downloaded via CVS on Jan 30th. When I run the SPEC SFS NFS test against this kernel, nfsd stops responding after awhile. I captured the state of all of
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg02756.html (10,550 bytes)

14. Re: nfsd lockups with xfs during SPEC SFS testing (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 31 Jan 2002 16:16:05 -0600
Is this a regression, i.e. did it used to work? And can you say when on the 30th? Thanks Steve -- Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511 Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software email: lord@xxxxxxx
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg02772.html (8,918 bytes)

15. RE: nfsd lockups with xfs during SPEC SFS testing (score: 1)
Author: "HABBINGA,ERIK (HP-Loveland,ex1)" <erik_habbinga@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 14:38:46 -0800
Steve, A co-worker of mine sent me a patch containing the CVS bits at 3:21pm Mountain time 1/30/02, he started the CVS download at 2:37pm Mountain time 1/30/02 and ended it at 2:38pm Mountain time 1/
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg02776.html (10,795 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu