Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*nfsd\:\s+non\-standard\s+errno\:\s+\-990\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. nfsd: non-standard errno: -990 (score: 1)
Author: Ondřej Surý <ondrej@xxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 12:16:54 +0100
after moving filesystem from one physical location to another, we are experiencing /subj errors. Filesystem is located on LVM2 volume on SCSI RAID10. We did dd old_system new_system and used xfs_gro
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00067.html (9,200 bytes)

2. Re: nfsd: non-standard errno: -990 (score: 1)
Author: x
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 08:06:22 -0600
Just to get the obvious things out of the way.... was the source filesystem unmounted when you dd'd it to the new one? -Eric Ondej Sur wrote: Hello, after moving filesystem from one physical locati
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00068.html (8,979 bytes)

3. Re: nfsd: non-standard errno: -990 (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 15:12:55 +0100
Yep, it was. Sorry, I could mention that, but it seemed so obvious :-). Ondrej. -- Ondej Sur <ondrej@xxxxxxxx>
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00069.html (9,080 bytes)

4. Re: nfsd: non-standard errno: -990 (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 14:29:46 -0600
Ondej Sur wrote: Yep, it was. Sorry, I could mention that, but it seemed so obvious :-). You might also try xfs_repair -n on your source disk before dd-ing, and on the target disk afterwards (-n me
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00076.html (8,909 bytes)

5. Re: nfsd: non-standard errno: -990 (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 09:23:38 +0100
The problem is, that action was already done and I cannot replicate it, because it holds production data. Althought I can prepare some test setup and try to replicate the problem. We tried xfs_repair
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00085.html (9,159 bytes)

6. Re: nfsd: non-standard errno: -990 (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 08:07:44 -0600
Ondej Sur wrote: The problem is, that action was already done and I cannot replicate it, because it holds production data. Althought I can prepare some test setup and try to replicate the problem.
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00087.html (9,520 bytes)

7. Re: nfsd: non-standard errno: -990 (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:35:02 +0100
We used latest ubuntu version ie. 2.6.18. We will upgrade it to 2.6.25 version and try to repair. Hopefully it will help, you know, customers are bit angry when it comes to losing all their mails :-)
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00088.html (9,775 bytes)

8. Re: nfsd: non-standard errno: -990 (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 16:21:00 -0600
Ondej Sur wrote: Ok, we will try to use 2.6.25 version and I will report result afterwards. Is there something you are particulary interested if it crashes again more then full log of activity? I w
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00089.html (9,663 bytes)

9. Re: nfsd: non-standard errno: -990 (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 12:48:01 +0100
Hi Eric, thanks for tip on newer xfs tools. We were able to repair filesystem and it's working ok again. Best regards, Ondrej Sury. -- Ondej Sur <ondrej@xxxxxxxx>
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00105.html (9,552 bytes)

10. nfsd: non-standard errno: -990 (score: 1)
Author: s@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 12:16:54 +0100
after moving filesystem from one physical location to another, we are experiencing /subj errors. Filesystem is located on LVM2 volume on SCSI RAID10. We did dd old_system new_system and used xfs_gro
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00237.html (9,200 bytes)

11. Re: nfsd: non-standard errno: -990 (score: 1)
Author: rej@xxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 08:06:22 -0600
Just to get the obvious things out of the way.... was the source filesystem unmounted when you dd'd it to the new one? -Eric Ondej Sur wrote: Hello, after moving filesystem from one physical locati
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00238.html (8,979 bytes)

12. Re: nfsd: non-standard errno: -990 (score: 1)
Author: een@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 15:12:55 +0100
Yep, it was. Sorry, I could mention that, but it seemed so obvious :-). Ondrej. -- Ondej Sur <ondrej@xxxxxxxx>
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00239.html (9,080 bytes)

13. Re: nfsd: non-standard errno: -990 (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 14:29:46 -0600
Ondej Sur wrote: Yep, it was. Sorry, I could mention that, but it seemed so obvious :-). You might also try xfs_repair -n on your source disk before dd-ing, and on the target disk afterwards (-n me
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00246.html (8,909 bytes)

14. Re: nfsd: non-standard errno: -990 (score: 1)
Author: thans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 09:23:38 +0100
The problem is, that action was already done and I cannot replicate it, because it holds production data. Althought I can prepare some test setup and try to replicate the problem. We tried xfs_repair
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00255.html (9,159 bytes)

15. Re: nfsd: non-standard errno: -990 (score: 1)
Author: sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 08:07:44 -0600
Ondej Sur wrote: The problem is, that action was already done and I cannot replicate it, because it holds production data. Althought I can prepare some test setup and try to replicate the problem.
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00257.html (9,520 bytes)

16. Re: nfsd: non-standard errno: -990 (score: 1)
Author: sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:35:02 +0100
We used latest ubuntu version ie. 2.6.18. We will upgrade it to 2.6.25 version and try to repair. Hopefully it will help, you know, customers are bit angry when it comes to losing all their mails :-)
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00258.html (9,775 bytes)

17. Re: nfsd: non-standard errno: -990 (score: 1)
Author: <ondrej@xxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 16:21:00 -0600
Ondej Sur wrote: Ok, we will try to use 2.6.25 version and I will report result afterwards. Is there something you are particulary interested if it crashes again more then full log of activity? I w
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00259.html (9,663 bytes)

18. Re: nfsd: non-standard errno: -990 (score: 1)
Author: s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 12:48:01 +0100
Hi Eric, thanks for tip on newer xfs tools. We were able to repair filesystem and it's working ok again. Best regards, Ondrej Sury. -- Ondej Sur <ondrej@xxxxxxxx>
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00275.html (9,552 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu