Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*networking\s+bugs\s+and\s+bugme\.osdl\.org\s*$/: 136 ]

Total 136 documents matching your query.

81. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 11:50:43 -0700
David S. Miller wrote: From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 22:46:10 -0700 If people choose to file bugs in bugzilla as well, they'll still be processed by someone. Jus
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01668.html (11,673 bytes)

82. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 14:37:38 -0700 (PDT)
No, this is the _BAD_ part, shit accumulates equally with useful reports. Useful reports in non-bugtracking system environments get retransmitted and eventually looked at.
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01669.html (10,175 bytes)

83. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 14:44:26 -0700 (PDT)
It would also keep bugs from falling through the cracks: People DON'T understand. I _WANT_ them to be able to fall through the cracks. If it's important, people will retransmit. This work for kernel
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01670.html (10,400 bytes)

84. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 14:54:26 -0700
David S. Miller wrote: From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 07:56:16 -0700 (PDT) The good of a bug tracking system against the mailing list is that bugs do survive in
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01672.html (11,786 bytes)

85. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 14:54:56 -0700 (PDT)
Don't even talk to me about too much work. Someone wants me to spend hours groveling through some pieces of code to track down some tricky bug, for free, and all I ask is that they retransmit the bug
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01673.html (11,182 bytes)

86. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 15:02:00 -0700 (PDT)
David, your method is the dream of every software developer. Having Q/A repeatedly pushing the same issue. Having a track is good and flagging a report as not-a-bug or need-more-info takes almost the
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01674.html (11,171 bytes)

87. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 15:02:48 -0700 (PDT)
It is not a dream, it works perfectly fine and has done so for 5+ years of Linux maintainence. To make these things scale you MUST push the work out to other people, you absolutely cannot centralize.
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01675.html (11,186 bytes)

88. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 15:11:53 -0700 (PDT)
David, I'm not willing to waste both precious time arguing on this but I will leave you question to think about. Is a bug report more useful for the user of a "system" or for the "system" itself ? -
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01676.html (11,510 bytes)

89. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 15:15:07 -0700
David S. Miller wrote: From: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 14:54:26 -0700 I think you are putting too much work on the bug reporter(s). Don't even talk to me about too m
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01677.html (13,160 bytes)

90. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 15:13:38 -0700 (PDT)
You can ask the same question about a patch, and my answer is the same, "it depends upon the bug/patch and whether the people it affects actually care about it". What's truly "useful" for the "system
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01678.html (10,993 bytes)

91. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 15:19:06 -0700 (PDT)
Forcing people to continue to retransmit the same report just pisses people off, and in the end will get you less useful reports than if you had flagged the report as 'please-gimme-more-info'. And th
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01679.html (10,985 bytes)

92. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 15:36:30 -0700
Forcing people to continue to retransmit the same report just pisses people off, and in the end will get you less useful reports than if you had flagged the report as 'please-gimme-more-info'. And th
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01680.html (13,081 bytes)

93. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: Ben Collins <bcollins@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 17:31:53 -0400
As a bug reporter, and as someone who receives bug reports, I can say that on both ends I find it easier to send emails, and get emails than to fiddle with any bug tracking tool. I'm with Dave on thi
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01681.html (12,491 bytes)

94. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 15:47:22 -0700
--"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote (on Friday, June 27, 2003 14:44:26 -0700): I fail to see your point here. If that's what you want, then just don't look at the bugme data. However it's st
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01682.html (10,899 bytes)

95. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: Larry McVoy <lm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 15:53:05 -0700
This might help. Or not. Brain dump on the bug tracking problem from the Kernel Summit discussions [SCCS/s.BUGS vers 1.3 2001/04/05 13:10:10] Outline Problems Problem details Past experiences Require
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01683.html (18,567 bytes)

96. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 28 Jun 2003 00:04:30 +0100
It works badly for kernel patches, stuff does get lost forever, missed etc. Having it all archived somewhere is really valuable because it means you can spot patterns, trends and also when someone wh
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01685.html (11,138 bytes)

97. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 28 Jun 2003 00:08:56 +0100
Tried doing an SQL query or text analysis for similarities on random messages lurking in private mailboxes or mixed up in list archives. Its really hard. Now try doing that with bugzilla and its real
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01686.html (11,589 bytes)

98. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 16:12:48 -0700
--"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote (on Friday, June 27, 2003 15:19:06 -0700): OK, both the scaling thing and the vacation issue are valid complaints, but they're both easy to fix. I realise
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01687.html (13,332 bytes)

99. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: Ben Collins <bcollins@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 18:30:24 -0400
Not to mention the "breeding" affect. A bug that many people have seen only once, but can never pinpoint because they can't reproduce it. One of those people reports the problem to the mailing list,
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01690.html (11,827 bytes)

100. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 17:00:22 -0700 (PDT)
The best power I have to scale is the delete key in my email reader, when I delete an email it's gone and that's it. bugme bugs don't have this attribute, they are like emails that persist forever un
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01691.html (10,503 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu