Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*networking\s+bugs\s+and\s+bugme\.osdl\.org\s*$/: 136 ]

Total 136 documents matching your query.

61. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: x>
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 23:45:58 +0200
porter/submitte
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg00851.html (11,505 bytes)

62. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: mes Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 14:51:14 -0700 (PDT)
nce. (And a lot
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg00852.html (11,215 bytes)

63. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author:
Date: 29 Jun 2003 23:07:07 +0100
e tended to, wh
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg00853.html (10,471 bytes)

64. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: oshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 15:13:02 -0700 (PDT)
#1131 #4151 or
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg00854.html (10,560 bytes)

65. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 23:28:13 +0100
ticipation in t
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg00855.html (8,352 bytes)

66. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 16:21:05 -0700 (PDT)
M flag in last
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg00857.html (10,533 bytes)

67. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: tasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 00:49:34 +0200
ion ;) - Davide
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg00858.html (11,216 bytes)

68. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: <aebr@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 19:35:44 -0700
, thanks James.
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg00860.html (12,732 bytes)

69. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: Jan Rychter <jan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 10:07:42 -0700
David> From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 28 Jun 2003 David> 20:19:32 +0100 David> Which means you miss stuff. David> Not my problem Alan. If the user gives a crap about their David> re
/archives/netdev/2003-07/msg00946.html (11,803 bytes)

70. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 22:22:22 -0700
The whole game changes when you are stretched as thinly as I am. Scaling becomes everything, and nitpicking through vague and poorly composed bug reports is an absolute waste of my time as networking
/archives/netdev/2003-07/msg00949.html (10,104 bytes)

71. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: Jan Rychter <jan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 22:42:36 -0700
David> The whole game changes when you are stretched as thinly as I am. David> Scaling becomes everything, and nitpicking through vague and David> poorly composed bug reports is an absolute waste of
/archives/netdev/2003-07/msg00950.html (10,677 bytes)

72. networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 22:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
I would like to ask everyone NOT to use bugme.osdl.org for networking bug reporting any more. It's absolutely the wrong model. When a bug gets filed that way it sort of goes into a black hole that _I
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01648.html (8,256 bytes)

73. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 22:46:10 -0700
I'll take you off the maintainers list, and find someone else to do it for networking. If you want net bugs reported to mailing lists, that's fine. If people choose to file bugs in bugzilla as well,
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01649.html (9,357 bytes)

74. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 22:47:39 -0700 (PDT)
Just so that someone can post them to the lists? That sounds like a completely silly way to operate. I'd rather they get posted to the lists _ONLY_. This way not that "someone", but "everyone" on the
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01650.html (9,803 bytes)

75. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 10:59:14 +0300
I have recently pondered usage of Request Tracker for this kind of tasks. The problem with "post to the list" is that sometimes things slip thru without anybody catching them. Integrating linux-kerne
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01653.html (12,226 bytes)

76. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 01:00:59 -0700 (PDT)
The problem with "post to the list" is that sometimes things slip thru without anybody catching them. It is not a problem, it is a feature. What will happen is the same thing that happens if Linus dr
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01654.html (10,265 bytes)

77. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 07:34:19 -0700
We can do that. The owner of a category can be a mailing list (eg the bugme-janitors list for some of the categories). The idea is to spread it across categories (one person for each (or a few) cate
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01660.html (11,219 bytes)

78. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 07:56:16 -0700 (PDT)
A bug tracking system stick you on a bug and makes all this to look like real work, that's why maybe David does not like it :) Kidding ;) The good of a bug tracking system against the mailing list is
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01661.html (11,062 bytes)

79. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 08:00:30 -0700
Yeah, that is tricky ... see below. That's easy. I actually already hand filter the bugs, and forward to linux-kernel those that seem to have enough information in to be useful to people, and aren't
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01662.html (12,858 bytes)

80. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: John Bradford <john@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 16:25:05 +0100
I did make the effort to make a dedicated bug database for kernel development in December last year. Do people actively hate it, or are they just not aware of it? :-). I got some very favourable com
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01664.html (10,015 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu