Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*networking\s+bugs\s+and\s+bugme\.osdl\.org\s*$/: 136 ]

Total 136 documents matching your query.

121. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 28 Jun 2003 20:26:50 +0100
I already pull chunks of bugzilla data into plain text for processing, the more formats and tools the better. You can do a lot of great things with large sets of bugzilla data when you throw it at a
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01724.html (12,330 bytes)

122. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 15:03:28 -0700 (PDT)
Which means you miss stuff. Not my problem Alan. If the user gives a crap about their report mattering, they'll do what I ask them to do. If users send their report to the wrong place, it will get l
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01728.html (11,009 bytes)

123. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: John Bradford <john@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 23:37:22 +0100
Also, remember that we sometimes get no response when something is fixed, which is especially true when the fix happens by itself. E.G. 2.5.foo released Bug reported to LKML, and nobody responds. 2.
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01730.html (10,296 bytes)

124. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 29 Jun 2003 00:15:38 +0100
You might not care but some of us do. Capturing the data matters for lots of things. That you don't have the time to be the filter for that info for networking is also fine.
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01733.html (11,164 bytes)

125. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 16:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 29 Jun 2003 00:15:38 +0100 You might not care but some of us do. Capturing the data matters for lots of things. That you don't have the time to be the
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01734.html (10,990 bytes)

126. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 29 Jun 2003 00:46:54 +0100
For IDE the statistical value of being able to go digging through old data has been more than worth the effort. Similarly writing tools to do the grovelling has a clear value. I'm trying to turn grov
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01735.html (11,412 bytes)

127. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 17:44:48 -0700
--Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote (on Saturday, June 28, 2003 20:20:53 +0100): Hmmm. we have VERIFIED set up to mean that the proposed fix has been verified to work. Could reshuffle it, or
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01736.html (12,077 bytes)

128. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 14:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
Not true, the assumption I make is that a bug report that a bug reporter cares about, and a patch that a patch submitter cares about, will all get resent if they get dropped. If the reporter/submitte
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01749.html (11,040 bytes)

129. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: Andries Brouwer <aebr@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 23:45:58 +0200
You are right, but only in the part where you say that this is the best, indeed the only, way you can work. Alan is right, information is important, and a lot of it is submitted only once. (And a lot
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01750.html (11,675 bytes)

130. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 14:51:14 -0700 (PDT)
And like evolution and many other processes in life, the things that put forth the effort will tend to get further and accomplish more. As a result, your bug reports will tend to not be tended to, wh
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01751.html (11,345 bytes)

131. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 29 Jun 2003 23:07:07 +0100
What you don't get is that like you I'm distributing work. I'm getting end users to spot bug correlations - and thats why I want better tools Report bug should get Your bug looks like #1131 #4151 or
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01752.html (10,641 bytes)

132. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 15:13:02 -0700 (PDT)
I understand this part, it's great sounding in theory. But all the examples I've seen are you sifting through bugzilla making these correlations. I've seen no evidence of community participation in t
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01753.html (10,696 bytes)

133. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: John Bradford <john@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 23:28:13 +0100
Note that my bug database actually does that, and has done for months, when somebody uploads their .config. John.
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01754.html (8,352 bytes)

134. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 16:21:05 -0700 (PDT)
You the winner ! You answered correctly to my previous question ;) - Davide
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01756.html (10,732 bytes)

135. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: Andries Brouwer <aebr@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 00:49:34 +0200
Maybe that is the wrong answer. It seems they have a bug tracking system. See, you think you are doing the submitter a favour. I prefer the point of view that the submitter does us a favour. Somethin
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01757.html (11,394 bytes)

136. Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (score: 1)
Author: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 19:35:44 -0700
--"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote (on Sunday, June 29, 2003 15:13:02 -0700): People have been. Maybe not with the networking bugs, but I've seen people sift through other stuff, and mark o
/archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01759.html (12,911 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu