Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*netfilter6\:\s+ICMPv6\s+type\s+143\s+doesn\'t\s+match\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*netfilter6\:\s+ICMPv6\s+type\s+143\s+doesn\'t\s+match\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. Re: netfilter6: ICMPv6 type 143 doesn't match (score: 1): Author: een <ak@xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 21:53:36 +0200; Sorry for getting back to this so late, I must have missed it at the time. Anyway, I think it would be safer to restore netfilters assumption by doing something like this patch. If everyone is fine w; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00227.html (12,208 bytes)
2. Re: netfilter6: ICMPv6 type 143 doesn't match (score: 1): Author: .jones2@xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 22:20:05 +0200; The last patch left some unreachable code. Index: net/ipv6/mcast.c == -- 2cfdb1827d9c176f4df42619c693e7b990a61963/net/ipv6/mcast.c (mode:100644 sha1:393b6e6f50a9626e2894c9a5abd8dafd903e5eba) +++ unco; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00230.html (12,709 bytes)
3. Re: netfilter6: ICMPv6 type 143 doesn't match (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 14:34:12 -0700; This looks OK with me, I hope it doesn't inadvertantly break anything.; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00239.html (9,860 bytes)
4. Re: netfilter6: ICMPv6 type 143 doesn't match (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 15:26:27 -0700; I'll look at it in more detail and let you know if I see any problems, but I wouldn't call it "igmpv6", which doesn't exist. "MLD" is the equivalent in IPv6. There certainly are existing references t; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00245.html (8,792 bytes)
5. Re: netfilter6: ICMPv6 type 143 doesn't match (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 00:32:31 +0200; Thanks. Is there a reason why these packets never hit the POST_ROUTING hook? Done. Regards Patrick; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00248.html (9,224 bytes)
6. Re: netfilter6: ICMPv6 type 143 doesn't match (score: 1): Author: aber@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 15:31:18 -0700; I think it is an oversight rather than intentional. The NDISC lookup stuff wrt. routing went back and forth implementation wise. We used to use a seperate routing table for NDISC entries, but that ca; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00251.html (9,420 bytes)
7. Re: netfilter6: ICMPv6 type 143 doesn't match (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 00:50:01 +0200; Thanks, I've added a call to NF_HOOK(NF_IP6_POST_ROUTING) to the patch. Index: net/ipv6/mcast.c == -- 2cfdb1827d9c176f4df42619c693e7b990a61963/net/ipv6/mcast.c (mode:100644 sha1:393b6e6f50a9626e2894c; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00253.html (13,164 bytes)
8. Re: netfilter6: ICMPv6 type 143 doesn't match (score: 1): Author: adi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 23:22:42 +1000; You're now incrementing this twice since the callers will also increment this. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Pa; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00299.html (9,905 bytes)
9. Re: netfilter6: ICMPv6 type 143 doesn't match (score: 1): Author: sov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 16:39:51 +0200; Thanks, I've removed the line again. Regards Patrick; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00303.html (9,298 bytes)
10. e - no rule matches (score: 1): Author: orge@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 18:47:52 +0100; is something going wrong in the protocol matching algorithm in netfilter6. Does this patch fix the problem ? Regards Patrick == net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c; /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00659.html (10,312 bytes)
11. ee. Usage count = 1 (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 13:17:34 +0900 (JST); bian sid. Haven't been able to debug it yet. -- http://www.PowerDNS.com Open source, database driven DNS Software http://lartc.org Linux Advanced Routing & Tra; /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00679.html (10,622 bytes)
12. s NOT Cheap Hosting (score: 1): Author: akai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 10:02:05 +0100 (CET); Very Good Hosting Offer $ $-- Cpanel $ $-- PHP $ $-- CGI-perl $ $-- Mysql $ $-- And MORE ....... $ FOR MORE INFORMATIONS --< http://mkhoster.com/support.html >; /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00682.html (8,654 bytes)
13. Re: netfilter6: ICMPv6 type 143 doesn't match (score: 1): Author: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 21:53:36 +0200; Sorry for getting back to this so late, I must have missed it at the time. Anyway, I think it would be safer to restore netfilters assumption by doing something like this patch. If everyone is fine w; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg01516.html (12,394 bytes)
14. Re: netfilter6: ICMPv6 type 143 doesn't match (score: 1): Author: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 22:20:05 +0200; The last patch left some unreachable code. Index: net/ipv6/mcast.c == -- 2cfdb1827d9c176f4df42619c693e7b990a61963/net/ipv6/mcast.c (mode:100644 sha1:393b6e6f50a9626e2894c9a5abd8dafd903e5eba) +++ unco; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg01519.html (12,880 bytes)
15. Re: netfilter6: ICMPv6 type 143 doesn't match (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 14:34:12 -0700; This looks OK with me, I hope it doesn't inadvertantly break anything.; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg01528.html (10,055 bytes)
16. Re: netfilter6: ICMPv6 type 143 doesn't match (score: 1): Author: David Stevens <dlstevens@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 15:26:27 -0700; I'll look at it in more detail and let you know if I see any problems, but I wouldn't call it "igmpv6", which doesn't exist. "MLD" is the equivalent in IPv6. There certainly are existing references t; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg01534.html (8,816 bytes)
17. Re: netfilter6: ICMPv6 type 143 doesn't match (score: 1): Author: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 00:32:31 +0200; Thanks. Is there a reason why these packets never hit the POST_ROUTING hook? Done. Regards Patrick; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg01537.html (9,354 bytes)
18. Re: netfilter6: ICMPv6 type 143 doesn't match (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 15:31:18 -0700; I think it is an oversight rather than intentional. The NDISC lookup stuff wrt. routing went back and forth implementation wise. We used to use a seperate routing table for NDISC entries, but that ca; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg01540.html (9,533 bytes)
19. Re: netfilter6: ICMPv6 type 143 doesn't match (score: 1): Author: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 00:50:01 +0200; Thanks, I've added a call to NF_HOOK(NF_IP6_POST_ROUTING) to the patch. Index: net/ipv6/mcast.c == -- 2cfdb1827d9c176f4df42619c693e7b990a61963/net/ipv6/mcast.c (mode:100644 sha1:393b6e6f50a9626e2894c; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg01542.html (13,327 bytes)
20. Re: netfilter6: ICMPv6 type 143 doesn't match (score: 1): Author: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 23:22:42 +1000; You're now incrementing this twice since the callers will also increment this. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Pa; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg01588.html (9,974 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]