Is netdev not fed regularely so it started munching messages again? I've not received the introduction message and patches 1-5 back only 6-7 which have been sitting in the queue due to refused connec
This is exactly what I saw as well. I did get all of your postings because you sent them with me on the CC: list, but netdev only sent out 6 and 7 to me just as you observed. This has become a regula
* David S. Miller <20050607.144237.93024273.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-06-07 14:42 I tried to resend, the message were accepted by oss.sgi.com but none of them came back. Maybe dropped due to duplicat
I thought netdev just picks on me ;-> My stoopid ISP as well as oss.sgi.com have some "clever" (read: questionable) ways of delivering email which violates end to end semantics of SMTP. I too noticed
Turns out that Thomas Graf's Email was intercepted by the spam filter, so I've tweaked the filter setup a bit - probably at the price of sacrificing some of the filter's effectivity. It unfortunately
* Ralf Baechle <20050608160444.GA17777@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-06-08 17:04 Can you tell me why it was filtered? It might be a problem with my patch script which I could fix on my side. How much work wou
Whitelists tend to be problematic due to the enormous amounts of spam and malware emails that come with forged email addresses. I'll send you the rules in question and the original spamyness scores t
* Ralf Baechle <20050608172809.GF5520@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-06-08 18:28 I'm not worried about a refused connections once in a while, I'm worried about that exactly those two messages that have been si
I see the delay due to SGI's firewall when I send postings out too, and it's very annoying. The fact that I can send an email faster to Herbert Xu in Australia (several thousand miles away) than oss.