Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*netdev\s+munching\s+messages\s+again\?\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. netdev munching messages again? (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 23:36:21 +0200
from last time:
/archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00261.html (8,300 bytes)

2. Re: netdev munching messages again? (score: 1)
Author: hemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 14:42:37 -0700 (PDT)
refused connec
/archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00262.html (9,207 bytes)

3. Re: netdev munching messages again? (score: 1)
Author: chek <pavel@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 15:29:53 +0200
rs/net/wireless
/archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00272.html (9,413 bytes)

4. Re: netdev munching messages again? (score: 1)
Author: l <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 09:44:23 -0400
. Pavel This is
/archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00277.html (11,057 bytes)

5. Re: netdev munching messages again? (score: 1)
Author: ohac <jbohac@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 17:04:45 +0100
kernel, not bu
/archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00285.html (11,046 bytes)

6. Re: netdev munching messages again? (score: 1)
Author: enc@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 18:13:14 +0200
t unfortunately
/archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00286.html (10,123 bytes)

7. Re: netdev munching messages again? (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 18:28:09 +0100
ad. Having a st
/archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00290.html (11,315 bytes)

8. Re: netdev munching messages again? (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:00:48 +0200
this and unders
/archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00297.html (10,567 bytes)

9. Re: netdev munching messages again? (score: 1)
Author: avem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 13:10:44 -0700 (PDT)
at have been si
/archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00298.html (10,305 bytes)

10. Re: netdev munching messages again? (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 13:30:53 -0700
away) than oss.
/archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00299.html (9,902 bytes)

11. Re: netdev munching messages again? (score: 1)
Author: hek <pavel@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 08:43:57 -0400
right thing. Pa
/archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00336.html (10,695 bytes)

12. netdev munching messages again? (score: 1)
Author: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 23:36:21 +0200
Is netdev not fed regularely so it started munching messages again? I've not received the introduction message and patches 1-5 back only 6-7 which have been sitting in the queue due to refused connec
/archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00862.html (8,480 bytes)

13. Re: netdev munching messages again? (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 14:42:37 -0700 (PDT)
This is exactly what I saw as well. I did get all of your postings because you sent them with me on the CC: list, but netdev only sent out 6 and 7 to me just as you observed. This has become a regula
/archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00863.html (9,387 bytes)

14. Re: netdev munching messages again? (score: 1)
Author: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 15:29:53 +0200
* David S. Miller <20050607.144237.93024273.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-06-07 14:42 I tried to resend, the message were accepted by oss.sgi.com but none of them came back. Maybe dropped due to duplicat
/archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00873.html (9,639 bytes)

15. Re: netdev munching messages again? (score: 1)
Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 09:44:23 -0400
I thought netdev just picks on me ;-> My stoopid ISP as well as oss.sgi.com have some "clever" (read: questionable) ways of delivering email which violates end to end semantics of SMTP. I too noticed
/archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00878.html (11,305 bytes)

16. Re: netdev munching messages again? (score: 1)
Author: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 17:04:45 +0100
Turns out that Thomas Graf's Email was intercepted by the spam filter, so I've tweaked the filter setup a bit - probably at the price of sacrificing some of the filter's effectivity. It unfortunately
/archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00886.html (11,328 bytes)

17. Re: netdev munching messages again? (score: 1)
Author: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 18:13:14 +0200
* Ralf Baechle <20050608160444.GA17777@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-06-08 17:04 Can you tell me why it was filtered? It might be a problem with my patch script which I could fix on my side. How much work wou
/archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00887.html (10,433 bytes)

18. Re: netdev munching messages again? (score: 1)
Author: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 18:28:09 +0100
Whitelists tend to be problematic due to the enormous amounts of spam and malware emails that come with forged email addresses. I'll send you the rules in question and the original spamyness scores t
/archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00891.html (11,655 bytes)

19. Re: netdev munching messages again? (score: 1)
Author: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:00:48 +0200
* Ralf Baechle <20050608172809.GF5520@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-06-08 18:28 I'm not worried about a refused connections once in a while, I'm worried about that exactly those two messages that have been si
/archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00898.html (10,935 bytes)

20. Re: netdev munching messages again? (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 13:10:44 -0700 (PDT)
I see the delay due to SGI's firewall when I send postings out too, and it's very annoying. The fact that I can send an email faster to Herbert Xu in Australia (several thousand miles away) than oss.
/archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00899.html (10,424 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu