Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*mounting\s+hixfs\s+\(Hitachi\s+\"tuned\"\s+XFS\)\s+on\s+2\.6\s+kernel\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. mounting hixfs (Hitachi "tuned" XFS) on 2.6 kernel (score: 1)
Author: big beer <bigbeerjr@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 17:08:16 -0700
Hello list, I seem to find myself in the unlucky situation of having myself some hixfs filesystems I'm trying to migrate off of. Some background on hixfs (as I understand it). At some point in the pa
/archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00194.html (11,565 bytes)

2. Re: mounting hixfs (Hitachi "tuned" XFS) on 2.6 kernel (score: 1)
Author: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 20:24:20 -0500
big beer put forth on 5/17/2010 7:08 PM: Why are you avoiding the obvious solution in favor of hacking? -- Stan
/archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00195.html (8,238 bytes)

3. Re: mounting hixfs (Hitachi "tuned" XFS) on 2.6 kernel (score: 1)
Author: big beer <bigbeerjr@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 20:34:14 -0700
Sending back to the list this time instead of Stan directly (Sorry Stan) :) The obvious solution for me would be a backup or rsync. Unfortunately both of those have issues with this particular setup
/archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00196.html (11,062 bytes)

4. Re: mounting hixfs (Hitachi "tuned" XFS) on 2.6 kernel (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 22:47:31 -0500
'HXFS' - heh. (58 46 53 42 'XFSB' is the proper magic) ... I can't speak to that, I dunno. *shrug* could try rewriting the magic with xfs_db and then having your way with it, see if that works. Or, j
/archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00197.html (11,579 bytes)

5. Re: mounting hixfs (Hitachi "tuned" XFS) on 2.6 kernel (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 14:21:30 +1000
There's no guarantee that mainline tools will work on this filesystem. As a matter of principle, I'd be asking Hitachi for the source code to their kernel module and userland tools and they are requi
/archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00198.html (12,330 bytes)

6. Re: mounting hixfs (Hitachi "tuned" XFS) on 2.6 kernel (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 23:23:27 -0500
You can select each superblock and write it. xfs_db -x /dev/blah ... this could be scripted with -c <command1> -c <command2> I don't know if they changed anything other than the magic though, so you
/archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00199.html (9,379 bytes)

7. Re: mounting hixfs (Hitachi "tuned" XFS) on 2.6 kernel (score: 1)
Author: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 23:37:58 -0500
big beer put forth on 5/17/2010 10:34 PM: No problem. I love my Tbird "reply-to-list" option. :) Seems to me you're taking some big chances with live data. One wrong turn and you could hose the FS an
/archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00200.html (11,192 bytes)

8. Re: mounting hixfs (Hitachi "tuned" XFS) on 2.6 kernel (score: 1)
Author: big beer <bigbeerjr@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 08:19:01 -0700
It's called a eNAS, but it's really just 2 linux 2.4 blades (debian woody), with failsafe (think heartbeat), LVM, custom XFS, samba, nfs, and a pile of sudo available scripts that are 700 and a web b
/archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00209.html (15,052 bytes)

9. Re: mounting hixfs (Hitachi "tuned" XFS) on 2.6 kernel (score: 1)
Author: Benjamin Lau <benjamin.a.lau@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 09:44:04 -0700
I think this is the document you might be looking for: http://www.hds.com/assets/pdf/open-source-licenses-applicable-to-hds-products.pdf This outlines all of the licenses for the various bits of Hita
/archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00210.html (17,463 bytes)

10. Re: mounting hixfs (Hitachi "tuned" XFS) on 2.6 kernel (score: 1)
Author: Roger Willcocks <roger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 17:57:37 +0100
The '-' character in the url in the pdf is a literal: http://www.hitachi.co.jp/products/it/storage-solutions/techsupport/download/index.html the page points to: http://www2.hitachi.co.jp/products/it/
/archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00212.html (18,523 bytes)

11. Re: mounting hixfs (Hitachi "tuned" XFS) on 2.6 kernel (score: 1)
Author: big beer <bigbeerjr@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 15:43:02 -0700
After changing the magic number on the 1st 6 superblocks and a 6 hour xfs_repair wait I can mount the FS. There are only a couple of things in lost+found, more than likely because I made my copy as t
/archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00215.html (21,097 bytes)

12. Re: mounting hixfs (Hitachi "tuned" XFS) on 2.6 kernel (score: 1)
Author: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 18:34:52 -0500
big beer put forth on 5/18/2010 10:19 AM: Ahh, ok. We're not talking about some cheap single box NAS appliance here with 4-10 local disks, but a blade "appliance" which connects via FC to SAN LUNs on
/archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00216.html (13,125 bytes)

13. Re: mounting hixfs (Hitachi "tuned" XFS) on 2.6 kernel (score: 1)
Author: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 23:19:21 -0500
big beer put forth on 5/18/2010 5:43 PM: IIRC (and IANAL) any version of XFS, with the exception of CXFS, running on Linux is GPL'd code. There is no such beast as non GPL XFS on Linux. For that SGI
/archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00225.html (10,803 bytes)

14. Re: mounting hixfs (Hitachi "tuned" XFS) on 2.6 kernel (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 08:53:04 -0500
Anyone with clear copyright can license the code under any license(s) they wish. So assuming SGI had clear copyright on all linux xfs code, it is certainly possible to offer it under an alternate lic
/archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00244.html (12,704 bytes)

15. Re: mounting hixfs (Hitachi "tuned" XFS) on 2.6 kernel (score: 1)
Author: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 09:03:41 -0500
Eric Sandeen put forth on 5/19/2010 8:53 AM: I admit my ignorance. I was under the impression the GPL forbade a copyright holder from releasing under parallel licenses if the GPL was one of them. Tha
/archives/xfs/2010-05/msg00245.html (11,860 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu