Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*mkfs\s+on\s+large\s+h\/w\s+RAID\s+fails\s*$/: 48 ]

Total 48 documents matching your query.

1. ng and other strangeness. (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 28 Jan 2002 12:02:59 -0500
I've got a terabyte RAID that I'm trying to set up as a single XFS filesystem. mkfs fails with: [root@malachite root]# mkfs.xfs -f /dev/sdb1 meta-data=/dev/sdb1 isize=256 agcount=224, agsize=1048576
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00773.html (9,750 bytes)

2. its xfs/nfs umask problem (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 28 Jan 2002 11:27:22 -0600
can you try 2.4.14 or 2.4.17 and also upgrade to the new tools? -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx "It is the part of a good
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00776.html (10,712 bytes)

3. s on large h/w RAID fails (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 28 Jan 2002 13:00:33 -0500
Do I need the XFS kernel to run mkfs.xfs or can I just install the new tools? -Dave
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00777.html (9,129 bytes)

4. s on large h/w RAID fails (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 28 Jan 2002 12:23:23 -0600
Any old kernel should do. Steve -- Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511 Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software email: lord@xxxxxxx
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00778.html (9,313 bytes)

5. y! (score: 1)
Author: lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 28 Jan 2002 14:39:44 -0500
[Please reply only to the mailing list.] Thought so. Unfortunately, I'm still seeing the same problem after installing xfsprogs-1.3.17: [root@malachite rpm]# mkfs.xfs -f /dev/sdb1 meta-data=/dev/sdb1
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00792.html (10,375 bytes)

6. truncate, mmap and holes. (score: 1)
Author: lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 28 Jan 2002 15:23:22 -0500
Using a binary search, I found that the largest size that works is 201318712. It's 72k, so I'll send it to you off list. Disk /dev/sdb: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 116960 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00799.html (8,121 bytes)

7. s on large h/w RAID fails (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 28 Jan 2002 13:46:32 -0600
OK, something is lying about the size of your device, it is coming in at 234870292 4K blocks. The data size check failed means it attempted to read the last block of the device and the read got an er
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00800.html (9,423 bytes)

8. ed file blocking setting. (score: 1)
Author: ith@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 12:07:32 +1100
Basically, what happens here is mkfs.xfs asks the device how big it is (using the BLKGETSIZE ioctl) and before starting to write to the disk, mkfs seeks to 4K from the end of the device and issues a
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00802.html (9,730 bytes)

9. truncate, mmap and holes. (score: 1)
Author: m@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 22:37:27 +0100
Does your kernel log anything? -- Wessel Dankers <wsl@xxxxxxxxxxxx> system has been recalled
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00807.html (7,827 bytes)

10. ng and other strangeness. (score: 1)
Author: hans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 09:00:48 +0100
Dave Sill schrieb: The message says 'data size check failed', can to try to specify data size by hand and maybe other parameters too. I guess the size detection algorythm ran into a problem with your
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00816.html (9,302 bytes)

11. s on large h/w RAID fails (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 19:11:49 -0600 (CST)
Hi Dave - Can you run this through strace, to see where things go wrong? All mkfs.xfs is doing when it failes, is trying to read the last block on the device. Since I don't have 1T laying around, I t
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00817.html (8,982 bytes)

12. on xfs added to filemap.c (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 28 Jan 2002 15:23:22 -0500
Using a binary search, I found that the largest size that works is 201318712. It's 72k, so I'll send it to you off list. Disk /dev/sdb: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 116960 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00822.html (8,377 bytes)

13. RAID fails (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 12:07:32 +1100
Basically, what happens here is mkfs.xfs asks the device how big it is (using the BLKGETSIZE ioctl) and before starting to write to the disk, mkfs seeks to 4K from the end of the device and issues a
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00824.html (9,715 bytes)

14. s on large h/w RAID fails (score: 1)
Author: hans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 22:37:27 +0100
Does your kernel log anything? -- Wessel Dankers <wsl@xxxxxxxxxxxx> system has been recalled
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00825.html (7,810 bytes)

15. truncate, mmap and holes. (score: 1)
Author: lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 28 Jan 2002 17:20:59 -0600
--=-g/TZnHIZn94r4/alyU/k Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Fancy that. :) Well, what Controller are you using? Can you strace the mkfs to see what's happening? ten=
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00838.html (10,019 bytes)

16. on xfs added to filemap.c (score: 1)
Author: lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 19:13:20 +0000 (GMT)
In-Reply-To: <200201291751.g0THp6qB004698@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> References: <200201291751.g0THp6qB004698@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> X-Mailer: Mahogany, 0.60 'Redmond', compiled for Linux 2.2.13 i686 MIME-Version: 1.0
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00843.html (9,563 bytes)

17. h ftruncate, mmap and holes. (score: 1)
Author: ou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 28 Jan 2002 12:02:59 -0500
I've got a terabyte RAID that I'm trying to set up as a single XFS filesystem. mkfs fails with: [root@malachite root]# mkfs.xfs -f /dev/sdb1 meta-data=/dev/sdb1 isize=256 agcount=224, agsize=1048576
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01702.html (9,750 bytes)

18. s xfs/nfs umask problem (score: 1)
Author: and <sikand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 28 Jan 2002 11:27:22 -0600
can you try 2.4.14 or 2.4.17 and also upgrade to the new tools? -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx "It is the part of a good
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01705.html (10,712 bytes)

19. ake 8.1 exhibits xfs/nfs umask problem (score: 1)
Author: ou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 28 Jan 2002 13:00:33 -0500
Do I need the XFS kernel to run mkfs.xfs or can I just install the new tools? -Dave
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01706.html (9,129 bytes)

20. oblem (score: 1)
Author: inux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 28 Jan 2002 12:23:23 -0600
Any old kernel should do. Steve -- Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511 Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software email: lord@xxxxxxx
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01707.html (9,313 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu