Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*memory\s+leak\s+in\s+net\/sched\/ipt\.c\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*memory\s+leak\s+in\s+net\/sched\/ipt\.c\?\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. orrect IPsec MTU in TCPMSS (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 22:30:49 +1100; It seems to be. This patch should free it. Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> BTW, please report networking bugs to netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxx Thanks, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.op; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01307.html (9,647 bytes)
2. Re: [IPSEC] Too many SADs! (score: 1): Author:; Date: 23 Mar 2005 07:40:18 -0500; Thanks for pointing this out - I _know_ its in the kernel list FAQ. I was sitting beside R Gooch when he added "thou shalt post to netdev". And of course i am gonna bitch about it every time someone; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01310.html (9,447 bytes)
3. C] Too many SADs! (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 13:55:16 +0100; * jamal <1111581618.1088.72.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-03-23 07:40 t is either valid or NULL so it's not a problem, unless you want to create janitor work of course. ;->; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01311.html (9,246 bytes)
4. net/sched/ipt.c? (score: 1): Author: sztian <hidden@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 23 Mar 2005 08:11:37 -0500; if t is null you still goto rtattr_failure I have seen people put little comments of "kfree will work if you pass it NULL" - are you saying such assumptions exist all over net/sched? didnt understand; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01312.html (9,608 bytes)
5. net/sched/ipt.c? (score: 1): Author: x>; Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:23:32 +0100; * jamal <1111583497.1089.92.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-03-23 08:11 kfree simply does nothing if it is given a null pointer so that goto rtattr_failure for t == NULL is handled just fine without a c; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01313.html (9,976 bytes)
6. net/sched/ipt.c? (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 23 Mar 2005 08:32:40 -0500; I cant get used to it either; actually i dont think i would be able to stop my fingers ;-> Yes, already Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> has made that point - although he did not post to netd; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01314.html (10,089 bytes)
7. net/sched/ipt.c? (score: 1): Author: Walter <wolfgang.walter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:40:36 +0100 (MET); Not only net/sched. The C standard requires that free(NULL) works. Jan Engelhardt --; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01315.html (8,817 bytes)
8. net/sched/ipt.c? (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: 23 Mar 2005 09:05:50 -0500; Thanks for clarifying this. cheers, jamal; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01316.html (9,319 bytes)
9. net/sched/ipt.c? (score: 1): Author: olfgang.walter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 23 Mar 2005 09:12:48 -0500; Actually its well documented even on the man pages - so should have not even have bothered discussing it;-> Should get new brand of coffee. Apologies for unecessarily abused electrons - which means d; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01317.html (9,870 bytes)
10. o many SADs! (score: 1): Author: gelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:27:32 -0800; Thanks for confirming. Are you guys interested in this kind of leaks? I have a list of about a hundred generated by our tool. -yichen; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01322.html (10,562 bytes)
11. PATCH 2.6.12-rc1-mm1] net/ethernet/eth.c - eth_header (score: 1): Author: son <dcn@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 07:37:10 +1100; Certainly. Please post all the networking leaks to netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxx Thanks, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01347.html (9,348 bytes)
12. Re: memory leak in net/sched/ipt.c? (score: 1): Author: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 22:30:49 +1100; It seems to be. This patch should free it. Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> BTW, please report networking bugs to netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxx Thanks, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.op; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg03230.html (9,760 bytes)
13. Re: memory leak in net/sched/ipt.c? (score: 1): Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 23 Mar 2005 07:40:18 -0500; Thanks for pointing this out - I _know_ its in the kernel list FAQ. I was sitting beside R Gooch when he added "thou shalt post to netdev". And of course i am gonna bitch about it every time someone; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg03233.html (9,497 bytes)
14. Re: memory leak in net/sched/ipt.c? (score: 1): Author: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 13:55:16 +0100; * jamal <1111581618.1088.72.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-03-23 07:40 t is either valid or NULL so it's not a problem, unless you want to create janitor work of course. ;->; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg03234.html (9,335 bytes)
15. Re: memory leak in net/sched/ipt.c? (score: 1): Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 23 Mar 2005 08:11:37 -0500; if t is null you still goto rtattr_failure I have seen people put little comments of "kfree will work if you pass it NULL" - are you saying such assumptions exist all over net/sched? didnt understand; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg03235.html (9,723 bytes)
16. Re: memory leak in net/sched/ipt.c? (score: 1): Author: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:23:32 +0100; * jamal <1111583497.1089.92.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-03-23 08:11 kfree simply does nothing if it is given a null pointer so that goto rtattr_failure for t == NULL is handled just fine without a c; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg03236.html (10,126 bytes)
17. Re: memory leak in net/sched/ipt.c? (score: 1): Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 23 Mar 2005 08:32:40 -0500; I cant get used to it either; actually i dont think i would be able to stop my fingers ;-> Yes, already Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> has made that point - although he did not post to netd; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg03237.html (10,265 bytes)
18. Re: memory leak in net/sched/ipt.c? (score: 1): Author: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:40:36 +0100 (MET); Not only net/sched. The C standard requires that free(NULL) works. Jan Engelhardt --; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg03238.html (8,967 bytes)
19. Re: memory leak in net/sched/ipt.c? (score: 1): Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 23 Mar 2005 09:05:50 -0500; Thanks for clarifying this. cheers, jamal; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg03239.html (9,519 bytes)
20. Re: memory leak in net/sched/ipt.c? (score: 1): Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 23 Mar 2005 09:12:48 -0500; Actually its well documented even on the man pages - so should have not even have bothered discussing it;-> Should get new brand of coffee. Apologies for unecessarily abused electrons - which means d; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg03240.html (10,091 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]