Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*loopback\s+devices\s+\(is\s+the\s+FAQ\s+entry\s+out\s+of\s+date\?\)\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. loopback devices (is the FAQ entry out of date?) (score: 1)
Author: Aaron Smith <aaron-xfs@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 16:26:14 -0700
The XFS FAQ says 2.4.2 needs a patch by Jens Axboes for loopback block devices to work under XFS. Is this still true as of 2.4.4? Thanks, Aaron
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00297.html (6,898 bytes)

2. Re: loopback devices (is the FAQ entry out of date?) (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2001 18:30:32 -0500
I'm fairly certain that loopback is working again under 2.4.4 - the 2.4.3 and 2.4.4 changelogs both reference loopback fixes. Maybe Jens will chime in with a definitive answer... :) -Eric -- Eric San
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00298.html (7,567 bytes)

3. Re: loopback devices (is the FAQ entry out of date?) (score: 1)
Author: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 12:08:35 +0200
2.4.4 should be fine, there are some minor buglets in there but nothing that will prevent it from working. -- Jens Axboe
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00301.html (8,018 bytes)

4. loopback devices (is the FAQ entry out of date?) (score: 1)
Author: een@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 16:26:14 -0700
The XFS FAQ says 2.4.2 needs a patch by Jens Axboes for loopback block devices to work under XFS. Is this still true as of 2.4.4? Thanks, Aaron
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01661.html (6,898 bytes)

5. Re: loopback devices (is the FAQ entry out of date?) (score: 1)
Author: s@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2001 18:30:32 -0500
I'm fairly certain that loopback is working again under 2.4.4 - the 2.4.3 and 2.4.4 changelogs both reference loopback fixes. Maybe Jens will chime in with a definitive answer... :) -Eric -- Eric San
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01662.html (7,567 bytes)

6. Re: loopback devices (is the FAQ entry out of date?) (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 12:08:35 +0200
2.4.4 should be fine, there are some minor buglets in there but nothing that will prevent it from working. -- Jens Axboe
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01665.html (8,018 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu