Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*linux\-2\.6\.9\s+eepro100\s+warning\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*linux\-2\.6\.9\s+eepro100\s+warning\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. Re: linux-2.6.9 eepro100 warning (score: 1): Author: " <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:16:46 -0400; /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg01020.html (8,673 bytes)
2. Re: linux-2.6.9 eepro100 warning (score: 1): Author: zik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:25:38 +1000; /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg01021.html (9,250 bytes)
3. Re: linux-2.6.9 eepro100 warning (score: 1): Author: er" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 15:27:49 +0900 (JST); /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg01022.html (8,849 bytes)
4. Re: linux-2.6.9 eepro100 warning (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:29:14 -0400; /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg01024.html (9,119 bytes)
5. Re: linux-2.6.9 eepro100 warning (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 21:54:38 +0200; /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg01040.html (8,975 bytes)
6. Re: linux-2.6.9 eepro100 warning (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 00:36:15 -0400; /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg01190.html (9,586 bytes)
7. Re: linux-2.6.9 eepro100 warning (score: 1): Author: rbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 00:38:20 -0400; /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg01191.html (9,846 bytes)
8. Re: linux-2.6.9 eepro100 warning (score: 1): Author: x; Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 17:45:37 +0200; /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg01214.html (9,673 bytes)
9. Re: linux-2.6.9 eepro100 warning (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 14:40:28 +0900; /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg01403.html (9,434 bytes)
10. Re: linux-2.6.9 eepro100 warning (score: 1): Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:16:46 -0400; I update linux kernel form 2.6.8.1 to 2.6.9. I found eepro100 warning, then I update 2.6.10-rc1, but same result. It is only warning, I think pro100 may work fine. This should be fixed in the 2.6.9-m; /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg02518.html (8,657 bytes)
11. Re: linux-2.6.9 eepro100 warning (score: 1): Author: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:25:38 +1000; Hi. I update linux kernel form 2.6.8.1 to 2.6.9. I found eepro100 warning, then I update 2.6.10-rc1, but same result. It is only warning, I think pro100 may work fine. This should be fixed in the 2.; /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg02519.html (9,226 bytes)
12. Re: linux-2.6.9 eepro100 warning (score: 1): Author: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 15:27:49 +0900 (JST); I'm afraid that e100 does not work well on some systems (e.g. my ThinkPad T30 on 2.4.x) while eepro100 does. (I also know there're systems which does not work well with eepro100 but e100.) Has all of; /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg02520.html (8,953 bytes)
13. Re: linux-2.6.9 eepro100 warning (score: 1): Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:29:14 -0400; The issues won't get resolved if there is no impetus to fix :) Jeff; /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg02522.html (9,296 bytes)
14. Re: linux-2.6.9 eepro100 warning (score: 1): Author: Terje Kvernes <terjekv@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 21:54:38 +0200; [ ... ] we have several systems where e100 produces netdev watchdog errors, while eepro100 works without problems. I can understand the desire to migrate, but what timeframe are we looking at? roughl; /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg02538.html (9,079 bytes)
15. Re: linux-2.6.9 eepro100 warning (score: 1): Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 00:36:15 -0400; Note that eepro100 driver will be deleted soon. I'm afraid that e100 does not work well on some systems (e.g. my ThinkPad T30 on 2.4.x) while eepro100 does. (I also know there're systems which does; /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg02688.html (9,720 bytes)
16. Re: linux-2.6.9 eepro100 warning (score: 1): Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 00:38:20 -0400; [ ... ] Note that eepro100 driver will be deleted soon. we have several systems where e100 produces netdev watchdog errors, while eepro100 works without problems. I can understand the desire to migra; /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg02689.html (9,875 bytes)
17. Re: linux-2.6.9 eepro100 warning (score: 1): Author: Terje Kvernes <terjekv@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 17:45:37 +0200; [ ... ] I got a very nice mail from Jesse Brandeburg saying pretty much the same thing... so, I've pushed kernels for around 75 boxen over to e100 today, from eepro100. I'm not _quite_ sure when I'll; /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg02712.html (9,835 bytes)
18. Re: linux-2.6.9 eepro100 warning (score: 1): Author: Seiichi Nakashima <nakasima@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 14:40:28 +0900; Thanks. I update a kernel's parameter from eepro100 to PRO/100. linux-2.6.9 work fine. == -- Seiichi Nakashima Email nakasima@xxxxxxxxxxx --; /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg02901.html (9,495 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]