Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*kgcc\s+now\s+required\s+\?\?\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. kgcc now required ?? (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Hengesbach <jeffh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 20:44:25 -0500
I have just updated from cvs as I went to "make bzImage" I received: "make: kgcc: Command not found" Is kgcc now required? If so what version. I'm running RH6.2 TIA, Jeff H
/archives/xfs/2001-02/msg00115.html (7,025 bytes)

2. Re: kgcc now required ?? (score: 1)
Author: sooo lame <kszysiu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 02:48:40 +0100
it's not required, but guys at SGI switched to RH7 and it's kgcc and think that others also did ;-) just edit Makefile in linux/ comment line with kgcc out and uncomment line with gcc -V 2.91.66 Rega
/archives/xfs/2001-02/msg00116.html (8,003 bytes)

3. Re: kgcc now required ?? (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 09:03:47 -0600
I suspect I did this in the 2.4.1 merge, I am doing my development on a redhat 7 platform. kgcc is no longer a redhat specific thing though, I think Mandrake is using it now too. If you were success
/archives/xfs/2001-02/msg00119.html (8,294 bytes)

4. Re: kgcc now required ?? (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 18:02:14 +0100
But can we at least get a decent work-around, that doesn't barf if kgcc isn't available? It seems rather silly to assume gcc is borken. -- Jens Axboe
/archives/xfs/2001-02/msg00123.html (8,829 bytes)

5. Re: kgcc now required ?? (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 11:21:00 -0600
As of 2.4.0, the official Makefile uses: CC :=$(shell if which $(CROSS_COMPILE)kgcc > /dev/null 2>&1; then echo $(CROSS_COMPILE)kgcc; else echo $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc; fi) -D__KERNEL__ -I$(HPATH) We sho
/archives/xfs/2001-02/msg00125.html (7,742 bytes)

6. Re: kgcc now required ?? (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 18:37:19 +0100
No - you seem to use some patched (-ac?) tree. Christoph -- Of course it doesn't work. We've performed a software upgrade.
/archives/xfs/2001-02/msg00126.html (8,549 bytes)

7. Re: kgcc now required ?? (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 13:00:40 -0600
There has been some debate as to the best way to do this. The extra shell invocation for every file compiled could be a bit expensive. I think most people brave enough to compile their own kernel sho
/archives/xfs/2001-02/msg00128.html (8,914 bytes)

8. Re: kgcc now required ?? (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: 12 Feb 2001 14:50:59 -0800
I think the best way is to: - copy the CC= line from the Makefile from vanilla 2.2.18 and put it instead of your CC= line in your kernel's Makefile - then copy /usr/src/linux-*/scripts/kwhich from 2.
/archives/xfs/2001-02/msg00148.html (8,608 bytes)

9. kgcc now required ?? (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 20:44:25 -0500
I have just updated from cvs as I went to "make bzImage" I received: "make: kgcc: Command not found" Is kgcc now required? If so what version. I'm running RH6.2 TIA, Jeff H
/archives/xfs/2001-02/msg00574.html (7,025 bytes)

10. Re: kgcc now required ?? (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 02:48:40 +0100
it's not required, but guys at SGI switched to RH7 and it's kgcc and think that others also did ;-) just edit Makefile in linux/ comment line with kgcc out and uncomment line with gcc -V 2.91.66 Rega
/archives/xfs/2001-02/msg00575.html (8,003 bytes)

11. Re: kgcc now required ?? (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 09:03:47 -0600
I suspect I did this in the 2.4.1 merge, I am doing my development on a redhat 7 platform. kgcc is no longer a redhat specific thing though, I think Mandrake is using it now too. If you were success
/archives/xfs/2001-02/msg00578.html (8,294 bytes)

12. Re: kgcc now required ?? (score: 1)
Author: rd@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 18:02:14 +0100
But can we at least get a decent work-around, that doesn't barf if kgcc isn't available? It seems rather silly to assume gcc is borken. -- Jens Axboe
/archives/xfs/2001-02/msg00582.html (8,829 bytes)

13. Re: kgcc now required ?? (score: 1)
Author: rd@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 11:21:00 -0600
As of 2.4.0, the official Makefile uses: CC :=$(shell if which $(CROSS_COMPILE)kgcc > /dev/null 2>&1; then echo $(CROSS_COMPILE)kgcc; else echo $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc; fi) -D__KERNEL__ -I$(HPATH) We sho
/archives/xfs/2001-02/msg00584.html (7,742 bytes)

14. Re: kgcc now required ?? (score: 1)
Author: en@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 18:37:19 +0100
No - you seem to use some patched (-ac?) tree. Christoph -- Of course it doesn't work. We've performed a software upgrade.
/archives/xfs/2001-02/msg00585.html (8,549 bytes)

15. Re: kgcc now required ?? (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 13:00:40 -0600
There has been some debate as to the best way to do this. The extra shell invocation for every file compiled could be a bit expensive. I think most people brave enough to compile their own kernel sho
/archives/xfs/2001-02/msg00587.html (8,914 bytes)

16. Re: kgcc now required ?? (score: 1)
Author: rd@xxxxxxx>
Date: 12 Feb 2001 14:50:59 -0800
I think the best way is to: - copy the CC= line from the Makefile from vanilla 2.2.18 and put it instead of your CC= line in your kernel's Makefile - then copy /usr/src/linux-*/scripts/kwhich from 2.
/archives/xfs/2001-02/msg00607.html (8,608 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu