Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*is\s+there\s+any\s+plan\s+to\s+support\s+BSD\s+accept\s+filter\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*is\s+there\s+any\s+plan\s+to\s+support\s+BSD\s+accept\s+filter\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. DEBUG]: sk_forward_alloc assertion failures (score: 1): Author: ve Peterson <dsp@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:51:08 -0500; (netif_queue_stopped(odev) || need_; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00602.html (7,441 bytes)
2. ailures (score: 1): Author: erbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:05:40 -0800; o do the same check as is done in sk_stream_alloc_pskb and sk_stream_alloc_page; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00612.html (7,753 bytes)
3. lloc assertion failures (score: 1): Author: rbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 21:22:53 -0500; uld be rare to have a 10 byte packet; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00619.html (8,751 bytes)
4. rnative version of S/390 shared NIC support (score: 1): Author: <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 16 Jan 2005 09:43:21 -0500; 2.6 kernel compare to 2.4. Theres is; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00657.html (9,556 bytes)
5. is there any plan to support BSD accept filter? (score: 1): Author: KyoungSoo Park <kyoungso@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:51:08 -0500; Hi, I just want to ask a quick question. Is there any plan to support FreeBSD-like accept filter (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=accf_http) for linux? If not, is there any glaring reason wh; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02092.html (7,380 bytes)
6. Re: is there any plan to support BSD accept filter? (score: 1): Author: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:05:40 -0800; If you want to do these kind of stateful hacks, why not build a netfilter module to do it? -- Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02102.html (7,801 bytes)
7. Re: is there any plan to support BSD accept filter? (score: 1): Author: KyoungSoo Park <kyoungso@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 21:22:53 -0500; yes. I agree that maybe an ugly hack to put that in the kernel. What I want to do is to support such feature leaving as little footprint as possible in the kernel, but specify whatever flexible polic; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02109.html (8,775 bytes)
8. Re: is there any plan to support BSD accept filter? (score: 1): Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 16 Jan 2005 09:43:21 -0500; Seems easy to do if you can muck with the security hooks. The selinux folkk already have a monopoly on all those hooks. Look at selinux and security_socket_accept() and how you can hook up to it. You; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02147.html (9,659 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]