Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*is\s+UDP

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*is\s+UDP_CORK\s+\"real\"\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. is UDP_CORK "real" (score: 1): Author: ber@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 16:14:56 -0700; ey: htt; /archives/netdev/2005-04/msg00718.html (9,201 bytes)
2. Re: is UDP_CORK "real" (score: 1): Author: <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 16:25:05 -0700; already; /archives/netdev/2005-04/msg00721.html (8,070 bytes)
3. Re: is UDP_CORK "real" (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 16:53:44 -0700; l->id.s; /archives/netdev/2005-04/msg00730.html (9,059 bytes)
4. Re: is UDP_CORK "real" (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 15:40:22 +0200; is case; /archives/netdev/2005-04/msg00849.html (8,836 bytes)
5. Re: is UDP_CORK "real" (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 10:20:28 +0200 (MEST); utive s; /archives/netdev/2005-04/msg00864.html (9,500 bytes)
6. is UDP_CORK "real" (score: 1): Author: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 16:14:56 -0700; I've been messing about with the latest netperf, and by accident specified -D for TCP_NODELAY on a UDP_RR test. In the past, and even today on HP-UX at least, that results in an error on the setsocko; /archives/netdev/2005-04/msg01854.html (9,418 bytes)
7. Re: is UDP_CORK "real" (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 16:25:05 -0700; Yes, it's there and it's real. If netperf is passing a TCP socket option number in for a setsockopt() on a UDP socket, how in the world is that the kernel's problem?; /archives/netdev/2005-04/msg01857.html (8,118 bytes)
8. Re: is UDP_CORK "real" (score: 1): Author: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 16:53:44 -0700; Is UDP_CORK going to be an ongoing feature? Yes, it's there and it's real. If netperf is passing a TCP socket option number in for a setsockopt() on a UDP socket, how in the world is that the kernel; /archives/netdev/2005-04/msg01866.html (9,155 bytes)
9. Re: is UDP_CORK "real" (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 15:40:22 +0200; AFAIK nobody has been updating the protocol manpages since I stopped doing so several years ago when they were included into the standard manpages. There are lots of missing features etc. that could; /archives/netdev/2005-04/msg01985.html (8,884 bytes)
10. Re: is UDP_CORK "real" (score: 1): Author: "Michael Kerrisk" <mtk-lkml@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 10:20:28 +0200 (MEST); I make ocassional changes, as far as my knowledge permits. But there's lots that I don't know... Yes, unfortunately. I welcome all such patches, which will go into the standard man-pages set (get th; /archives/netdev/2005-04/msg02000.html (9,552 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]