There's a lot to clean up in header file, too... And this time it actually works. Now, I'd like to clean it a bit more and then submit it to akpm for -mm series. Will someone hate me for doing that?
Initial look over the patch looks reasonable; no functionality changes, just code reduction. That said, I would like to pass it through a quick validation cycle before its picked up. We submitted ipw
Any chance of making those regression tests public so we can all do this kind of testing on any future changes that might be made to the driver? Remember, once it hits mainline, lots of different peo
I believe all of our test plans are available publically. We just put up test runner on our bugzilla server so that we can better track which tests have been run by users, etc. Some tests are automat
The only wait to make that works is to opensource the testsuites and allow the distros to run the QA test themselves. Except for maybe SuSE no one will pick up a driver version just because you say s
Since you apparently have this hardware, I'm going to hijack your attention for a second for the benefit of wireless crowd. How good it it? Signal strength/sensitivity? Does driver/fw/hw survive prol
No idea, flat I live in is so small I can get away with connecting using bluetooth. I'm not sure if ipw2100 supports 802.11g.... Pavel -- Boycott Kodak -- for their patent abuse against Java.
ipw2200 supports g, and is in a different project at http://ipw2200.sf.net. ipw2100 is only b. -- John M Flinchbaugh john@xxxxxxxxxx Attachment: signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Nice, thanks for the pointers. Of course. Good luck testing every kernel release :) Perhaps you might want to automate this with a test against the kernel-of-the-day once the driver makes it into mai
Hi! There's a lot to clean up in header file, too... And this time it actually works. Now, I'd like to clean it a bit more and then submit it to akpm for -mm series. Will someone hate me for doing th
Initial look over the patch looks reasonable; no functionality changes, just code reduction. That said, I would like to pass it through a quick validation cycle before its picked up. We submitted ipw
Any chance of making those regression tests public so we can all do this kind of testing on any future changes that might be made to the driver? Remember, once it hits mainline, lots of different peo
I believe all of our test plans are available publically. We just put up test runner on our bugzilla server so that we can better track which tests have been run by users, etc. Some tests are automat
The only wait to make that works is to opensource the testsuites and allow the distros to run the QA test themselves. Except for maybe SuSE no one will pick up a driver version just because you say s
Since you apparently have this hardware, I'm going to hijack your attention for a second for the benefit of wireless crowd. How good it it? Signal strength/sensitivity? Does driver/fw/hw survive prol
Hi! No idea, flat I live in is so small I can get away with connecting using bluetooth. I'm not sure if ipw2100 supports 802.11g.... Pavel -- Boycott Kodak -- for their patent abuse against Java.
ipw2200 supports g, and is in a different project at http://ipw2200.sf.net. ipw2100 is only b. -- John M Flinchbaugh john@xxxxxxxxxx Attachment: signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Nice, thanks for the pointers. Of course. Good luck testing every kernel release :) Perhaps you might want to automate this with a test against the kernel-of-the-day once the driver makes it into mai