Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ipv4\s+ipsec\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. ipv4 ipsec (score: 1)
Author: S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 00:47:17 +0200
Im not sure this is the correct list for ipsec issues, but shouldn't the size check at the bottom of net/ipv4/esp4.c be the other way around (2.6.11)? static int __init esp4_init(void) { struct xfrm
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg01270.html (7,870 bytes)

2. Re: ipv4 ipsec (score: 1)
Author: esias@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 15:56:42 -0700 (PDT)
You are right, good catch. Luckily the size of esp_decap_data is exactly 20 bytes, so the incorrect test happens to be harmless. Please porperly -p1 root your patch so I can apply it, and also please
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg01273.html (8,102 bytes)

3. Re: ipv4 ipsec (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 01:23:40 +0200
mostly harmless.. But for gcc ports that create packed structs per default, it is 19 bytes. oh sorry, I hope I get it right this time :) Best regards -- Programmer Edgar E Iglesias <edgar@xxxxxxxx> 4
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg01277.html (9,466 bytes)

4. Re: ipv4 ipsec (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 16:47:41 -0700 (PDT)
Your email client has mangled the tab characters into spaces in the patch, so the patch still will not apply correctly. Please fix this.
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg01281.html (7,780 bytes)

5. Re: ipv4 ipsec (score: 1)
Author: el@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 02:02:59 +0200
One more try.. sorry Best regards -- Programmer Edgar E Iglesias <edgar@xxxxxxxx> 46.46.272.1946 Signed-off-by: Edgar E Iglesias <edgar@xxxxxxxx> -- -- linux-2.6.11-gentoo-r6/net/ipv4/esp4.c 2005-04-
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg01283.html (8,833 bytes)

6. Re: ipv4 ipsec (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 17:08:05 -0700 (PDT)
Patch applied, thank you.
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg01284.html (7,856 bytes)

7. ipv4 ipsec (score: 1)
Author: Edgar E Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 00:47:17 +0200
Hi, Im not sure this is the correct list for ipsec issues, but shouldn't the size check at the bottom of net/ipv4/esp4.c be the other way around (2.6.11)? static int __init esp4_init(void) { struct x
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg02559.html (7,870 bytes)

8. Re: ipv4 ipsec (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 15:56:42 -0700 (PDT)
You are right, good catch. Luckily the size of esp_decap_data is exactly 20 bytes, so the incorrect test happens to be harmless. Please porperly -p1 root your patch so I can apply it, and also please
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg02562.html (8,160 bytes)

9. Re: ipv4 ipsec (score: 1)
Author: Edgar E Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 01:23:40 +0200
mostly harmless.. But for gcc ports that create packed structs per default, it is 19 bytes. oh sorry, I hope I get it right this time :) Best regards -- Programmer Edgar E Iglesias <edgar@xxxxxxxx> 4
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg02566.html (9,571 bytes)

10. Re: ipv4 ipsec (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 16:47:41 -0700 (PDT)
Your email client has mangled the tab characters into spaces in the patch, so the patch still will not apply correctly. Please fix this.
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg02570.html (7,905 bytes)

11. Re: ipv4 ipsec (score: 1)
Author: Edgar E Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 02:02:59 +0200
One more try.. sorry Best regards -- Programmer Edgar E Iglesias <edgar@xxxxxxxx> 46.46.272.1946 Signed-off-by: Edgar E Iglesias <edgar@xxxxxxxx> -- -- linux-2.6.11-gentoo-r6/net/ipv4/esp4.c 2005-04-
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg02572.html (9,007 bytes)

12. Re: ipv4 ipsec (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 17:08:05 -0700 (PDT)
Patch applied, thank you.
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg02573.html (7,982 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu