Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ipv4\.o\s+module\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ipv4\.o\s+module\s*$/: 30 ]

Total 30 documents matching your query.

1. ipv4.o module (score: 1): Author: Dominic Duval <dd@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 03:31:25 -0500; Hi everyone, I recently spent some time working on the "modularization" of the ipv4 stack. More precisely, this allows anyone to boot the kernel without any ipv4 support (thus saving about 200k of RA; /archives/netdev/2002-03/msg00047.html (8,679 bytes)
2. Re: ipv4.o module (score: 1): Author: Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 16:41:31 +0200; Excellent. I had plan to do that latter this spring, but like always, there are parallel developments. One of my goals is to rip the TCP and UDP into separate submodules, so that we can in fact load; /archives/netdev/2002-03/msg00048.html (9,799 bytes)
3. Re: ipv4.o module (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 16:06:45 -0500; Matti Aarnio wrote: I recently spent some time working on the "modularization" of the ipv4 stack. More precisely, this allows anyone to boot the kernel without any ipv4 support (thus saving about 200; /archives/netdev/2002-03/msg00054.html (10,159 bytes)
4. Re: ipv4.o module (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 00:00:18 +0100; Dominic Duval <dd@xxxxxxxx> : On a related note, could somebody elaborate on why the EXPORT_SYMBOL are done from net/netsyms.c ? -- Ueimor; /archives/netdev/2002-03/msg00055.html (8,851 bytes)
5. Re: ipv4.o module (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 01:17:31 +0200; Static linkage symbols of net-kind are done from there. It took some care year(s) ago to move ipv4 exports elsewere, when I did previous try at modularizing the IP stack. Some remnants may be visible; /archives/netdev/2002-03/msg00056.html (9,599 bytes)
6. Re: ipv4.o module (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 16:04:34 -0800; Excellent. I had plan to do that latter this spring, but like always, there are parallel developments. There are at least three sets of patches like this floating about (I did this some time ago and; /archives/netdev/2002-03/msg00058.html (9,213 bytes)
7. Re: ipv4.o module (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 02:11:11 +0200; .... A pure IPv6 only system is the goal I had in mind. The IPv6 does happen to need TCP and UDP, which even use shared port number spaces (quite a complicated thing, actually.) /Matti Aarnio; /archives/netdev/2002-03/msg00059.html (9,241 bytes)
8. Re: ipv4.o module (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 16:29:52 -0800; A pure IPv6 only system is the goal I had in mind. The IPv6 does happen to need TCP and UDP, which even use shared port number spaces (quite a complicated thing, actually.) Ah, well then we need ipv4; /archives/netdev/2002-03/msg00060.html (8,970 bytes)
9. Re: ipv4.o module (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 13:06:00 +1100; Historical reasons. The original method of exporting symbols required header and trailer X macros and it was easier to have one file per subsystem that did all the exports. With EXPORT_SYMBOL you can; /archives/netdev/2002-03/msg00061.html (9,338 bytes)
10. Re: ipv4.o module (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 04:26:03 +0200; Something like that. I think there are things like timer management for tcp retransmissions, and such things which fall into "generic-ip" category, but there are also a lot of IPv4/IPv6 specific thin; /archives/netdev/2002-03/msg00063.html (9,854 bytes)
11. Re: ipv4.o module (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 13:12:17 -0500 (EST); Have you thought of the pandora box this opens? Imagine someone running a BSD IP module to replace the Linux one (and of course many proprietary others). The question is more philosophical than tech; /archives/netdev/2002-03/msg00071.html (8,264 bytes)
12. Re: ipv4.o module (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 11:37:24 -0700; Have you thought of the pandora box this opens? Imagine someone running a BSD IP module to replace the Linux one (and of course many proprietary others). The question is more philosophical than techn; /archives/netdev/2002-03/msg00072.html (9,897 bytes)
13. Re: ipv4.o module (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 13:41:11 -0500; jamal> Have you thought of the pandora box this opens? jamal> Imagine someone running a BSD IP module to replace the jamal> Linux one (and of course many proprietary others). Or, running the Linux o; /archives/netdev/2002-03/msg00073.html (9,147 bytes)
14. Re: ipv4.o module (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 20:03:56 +0100; (Cc trimmed, everybody is here) jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> : Isn't it simpler to completely use BSD for proprietary application and avoid any hassle with "derived work" subject to GPL then ? -- Ueimor; /archives/netdev/2002-03/msg00075.html (8,536 bytes)
15. Re: ipv4.o module (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 23:46:15 +0200; Nothing new. You can do that already. You just DON'T define CONFIG_INET, and you will have room for plugging in your own IPv4 stack. /Matti Aarnio; /archives/netdev/2002-03/msg00076.html (8,775 bytes)
16. ipv4.o module (score: 1): Author: Dominic Duval <dd@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 03:31:25 -0500; Hi everyone, I recently spent some time working on the "modularization" of the ipv4 stack. More precisely, this allows anyone to boot the kernel without any ipv4 support (thus saving about 200k of RA; /archives/netdev/2002-03/msg00190.html (8,727 bytes)
17. Re: ipv4.o module (score: 1): Author: Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 16:41:31 +0200; Excellent. I had plan to do that latter this spring, but like always, there are parallel developments. One of my goals is to rip the TCP and UDP into separate submodules, so that we can in fact load; /archives/netdev/2002-03/msg00191.html (9,900 bytes)
18. Re: ipv4.o module (score: 1): Author: Dominic Duval <dd@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 16:06:45 -0500; I recently spent some time working on the "modularization" of the ipv4 stack. More precisely, this allows anyone to boot the kernel without any ipv4 support (thus saving about 200k of RAM) and load a; /archives/netdev/2002-03/msg00197.html (10,224 bytes)
19. Re: ipv4.o module (score: 1): Author: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 00:00:18 +0100; Dominic Duval <dd@xxxxxxxx> : [...] On a related note, could somebody elaborate on why the EXPORT_SYMBOL are done from net/netsyms.c ? -- Ueimor; /archives/netdev/2002-03/msg00198.html (8,990 bytes)
20. Re: ipv4.o module (score: 1): Author: Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 01:17:31 +0200; Static linkage symbols of net-kind are done from there. It took some care year(s) ago to move ipv4 exports elsewere, when I did previous try at modularizing the IP stack. Some remnants may be visible; /archives/netdev/2002-03/msg00199.html (9,791 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]