Whats wrong with this patch (just a thought, not tested or even compiled)? -- -- devinet.c 2001/09/04 19:18:51 1.1 +++ devinet.c 2001/09/04 19:31:13 @@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ if ((in_dev=__in_dev_get(dev)
Thanks for trying to help, however, that's not going to work this way, sorry. 1. "sin" is cleared a few lines above, so you end up comparing 0.0.0.0 against "ifa->ifa_address". 2. two interfaces can
Andi, Alexey, Whats wrong with this patch (just a thought, not tested or even compiled)? -- -- devinet.c 2001/09/04 19:18:51 1.1 +++ devinet.c 2001/09/04 19:31:13 @@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ if ((in_dev=__in
Thanks for trying to help, however, that's not going to work this way, sorry. 1. "sin" is cleared a few lines above, so you end up comparing 0.0.0.0 against "ifa->ifa_address". 2. two interfaces can