Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*immutable\s+bits\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. immutable bits (score: 1)
Author: Greg Whynott <greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 12:17:05 -0500
We converted all our file systems to XFS. On the ext3 file systems we would set the immutable bit on some dirs. Is there something similar I can set on a directory within an XFS filesystem? We don't
/archives/xfs/2003-11/msg00166.html (7,174 bytes)

2. Re: immutable bits (score: 1)
Author: Net Llama! <netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 12:36:14 -0500 (EST)
Would chattr work? -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Lonni J Friedman netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com
/archives/xfs/2003-11/msg00167.html (8,012 bytes)

3. Re: immutable bits (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: 20 Nov 2003 11:46:03 -0600
Yes, the latest snapshot code (but not XFS 1.3.1) has this code, courtesy of Ethan Benson. A scan of the archives should turn up more info. -Eric -- Eric Sandeen [C]XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/p
/archives/xfs/2003-11/msg00168.html (8,233 bytes)

4. Re: immutable bits (score: 1)
Author: Greg Whynott <greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 12:54:58 -0500
thanks for the reply. chattr works wonders on an ext file system, it is what i spoke of actually. issuing "chattr +i foo" would cause foo to be 'unlinkable' until you issued a "chattr -i foo". i beli
/archives/xfs/2003-11/msg00169.html (9,074 bytes)

5. Re: immutable bits (score: 1)
Author: Christian Guggenberger <christian.guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 20:08:36 +0100
this should definitly work on a xfs filesystem, too - at least it does so here on my system... christian
/archives/xfs/2003-11/msg00170.html (8,590 bytes)

6. Re: immutable bits (score: 1)
Author: Christian Guggenberger <christian.guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 20:25:10 +0100
oops, sorry. Eric is of course right - recent xfs code is needed - , I have had tested this on 2.6 and 2.4.23rc only... Christian
/archives/xfs/2003-11/msg00171.html (9,000 bytes)

7. immutable bits (score: 1)
Author: Greg Whynott <greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 12:17:05 -0500
We converted all our file systems to XFS. On the ext3 file systems we would set the immutable bit on some dirs. Is there something similar I can set on a directory within an XFS filesystem? We don't
/archives/xfs/2003-11/msg00427.html (7,174 bytes)

8. Re: immutable bits (score: 1)
Author: Net Llama! <netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 12:36:14 -0500 (EST)
Would chattr work? -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Lonni J Friedman netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com
/archives/xfs/2003-11/msg00428.html (8,012 bytes)

9. Re: immutable bits (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: 20 Nov 2003 11:46:03 -0600
Yes, the latest snapshot code (but not XFS 1.3.1) has this code, courtesy of Ethan Benson. A scan of the archives should turn up more info. -Eric -- Eric Sandeen [C]XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/p
/archives/xfs/2003-11/msg00429.html (8,233 bytes)

10. Re: immutable bits (score: 1)
Author: Greg Whynott <greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 12:54:58 -0500
thanks for the reply. chattr works wonders on an ext file system, it is what i spoke of actually. issuing "chattr +i foo" would cause foo to be 'unlinkable' until you issued a "chattr -i foo". i beli
/archives/xfs/2003-11/msg00430.html (9,074 bytes)

11. Re: immutable bits (score: 1)
Author: Christian Guggenberger <christian.guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 20:08:36 +0100
this should definitly work on a xfs filesystem, too - at least it does so here on my system... christian
/archives/xfs/2003-11/msg00431.html (8,590 bytes)

12. Re: immutable bits (score: 1)
Author: Christian Guggenberger <christian.guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 20:25:10 +0100
oops, sorry. Eric is of course right - recent xfs code is needed - , I have had tested this on 2.6 and 2.4.23rc only... Christian
/archives/xfs/2003-11/msg00432.html (9,000 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu