Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*how\s+cant\s+I\s+rebuild\s+the\s+superblock\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*how\s+cant\s+I\s+rebuild\s+the\s+superblock\s*$/: 70 ]

Total 70 documents matching your query.

1. s on softwareraid crash (score: 1): Author: ven@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 15:00:16 +0200 (CEST); is there a option available to rebuld the superblock? with reiserfs i an option exist --rebuild-sb. with best regards sven [[HTML alternate version deleted]]; /archives/xfs/2005-03/msg00143.html (7,942 bytes)
2. rebuild the superblock (score: 1): Author: ven@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 07:36:40 -0600; is there a option available to rebuld the superblock? with reiserfs i an option exist --rebuild-sb. with best regards sven You could make a sparse file the same size as the partition, do a mkfs on th; /archives/xfs/2005-03/msg00144.html (9,124 bytes)
3. ild the superblock (score: 1): Author: ven@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 17:07:42 +0200 (CEST); Am Mi 30.03.2005 15:36 schrieb Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>: Hallo, Can you tell me how to creat a sparse file? The partition-tool from suse show me the /dev/md0 with 135,6GB. Is this the size where I n; /archives/xfs/2005-03/msg00146.html (8,979 bytes)
4. rebuild the superblock (score: 1): Author: ven@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 09:36:44 -0600; Sven Gehr wrote: Am Mi 30.03.2005 15:36 schrieb Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>: Hallo, You could make a sparse file the same size as the partition, do a mkfs on the file, then dd the first 512 bytes out t; /archives/xfs/2005-03/msg00147.html (11,342 bytes)
5. rebuild the superblock (score: 1): Author: ord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 17:58:52 +0200 (CEST); Am Mi 30.03.2005 17:36 schrieb Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>: Hallo, [...] ok, I have the sparse file generate. I have the orginal xfs on the suse 9.1 machine with yast without modify the parameter. [...; /archives/xfs/2005-03/msg00148.html (10,711 bytes)
6. rebuild the superblock (score: 1): Author: ven@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:11:40 -0600; Sven Gehr wrote: Am Mi 30.03.2005 17:36 schrieb Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>: [...] do dd if=/dev/md0 of=/tmp/block bs=16k count=1 then do od -xa on this file and send the output to the list, it will be; /archives/xfs/2005-03/msg00149.html (10,385 bytes)
7. rebuild the superblock (score: 1): Author: ord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 18:26:07 +0200 (CEST); Am Mi 30.03.2005 18:11 schrieb Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>: [...] No, I can't remember the orginal order :-( I must make: dd if=/dev/sdax of=/tmp/block bs=16k count=1 for all raid devices (sda2, sdb2 a; /archives/xfs/2005-03/msg00150.html (10,139 bytes)
8. rebuild the superblock (score: 1): Author: ven@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 19:08:17 +0200 (CEST); Am Mi 30.03.2005 18:11 schrieb Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>: [...] Ok. I have do: dd if=/dev/sdX2 of=sdX2_header bs=16k count=1 for alle (sda2, sdb2, sdc2) devices. Next time I have od -xa with alle fil; /archives/xfs/2005-03/msg00151.html (10,919 bytes)
9. rebuild the superblock (score: 1): Author: ven@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 09:41:41 -0800; mkfs.xfs will get some values from the underlying device if it's softraid and you will have to know those.; /archives/xfs/2005-03/msg00152.html (8,580 bytes)
10. rebuild the superblock (score: 1): Author: wood <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 09:42:59 -0800; You need to sort that out before anything else.; /archives/xfs/2005-03/msg00153.html (9,646 bytes)
11. rebuild the superblock (score: 1): Author: wood <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:20:33 -0600; Sven Gehr wrote: Ok. I have do: dd if=/dev/sdX2 of=sdX2_header bs=16k count=1 for alle (sda2, sdb2, sdc2) devices. Next time I have od -xa with alle files. The output is in the attachment. I can't fi; /archives/xfs/2005-03/msg00154.html (9,975 bytes)
12. rebuild the superblock (score: 1): Author: ord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 20:49:29 +0200 (CEST); Am Mi 30.03.2005 19:42 schrieb Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>: I can' reconstruct the orignal sort. I can test all combinations. Is there a facility to test but I can see when I have the right sort?; /archives/xfs/2005-03/msg00155.html (10,331 bytes)
13. rebuild the superblock (score: 1): Author: ven@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 20:51:36 +0200 (CEST); Am Mi 30.03.2005 20:20 schrieb Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>: I have generate the file new for sda2 and sdb2. It is in the attachment. Attachment: sda2_header_ascii Description: Binary data Attachment: s; /archives/xfs/2005-03/msg00156.html (10,492 bytes)
14. rebuild the superblock (score: 1): Author: ven@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:53:24 -0800; make a script iterrating over all combinations and run xfs_check. assuming you didn't stomp on anything that should work.; /archives/xfs/2005-03/msg00157.html (10,378 bytes)
15. rebuild the superblock (score: 1): Author: wood <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:54:34 -0800; Is this soft-raid w/o superblocks? Usually with softraid it puts the raid superblock at the end of the disk (I think) and it has details on the volume and disks.; /archives/xfs/2005-03/msg00158.html (10,372 bytes)
16. rebuild the superblock (score: 1): Author: wood <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 20:59:28 +0200 (CEST); Am Mi 30.03.2005 20:53 schrieb Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>: I can do that manuell with change the SCSI-ID. Is this ok?; /archives/xfs/2005-03/msg00159.html (10,987 bytes)
17. rebuild the superblock (score: 1): Author: ven@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 21:01:08 +0200 (CEST); Am Mi 30.03.2005 20:54 schrieb Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>: What is w/o superblocks?; /archives/xfs/2005-03/msg00160.html (10,732 bytes)
18. rebuild the superblock (score: 1): Author: ven@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 11:01:18 -0800; umm? sorry if i missed this, is this soft-raid with or without superblocks? either way you shouldn't have to mess with the scsi-id's; /archives/xfs/2005-03/msg00161.html (10,820 bytes)
19. rebuild the superblock (score: 1): Author: wood <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 11:05:20 -0800; the kernel raid subsystem can (and usually does by default) mark each disk in a raid group do you don't have to worry about the order. i think they call it persusten superblocks or something. if you; /archives/xfs/2005-03/msg00162.html (10,611 bytes)
20. rebuild the superblock (score: 1): Author: wood <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 13:05:57 -0600; Sven Gehr wrote: Am Mi 30.03.2005 20:20 schrieb Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>: Sven Gehr wrote: Ok. I have do: dd if=/dev/sdX2 of=sdX2_header bs=16k count=1 for alle (sda2, sdb2, sdc2) devices. Next time; /archives/xfs/2005-03/msg00163.html (10,793 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]