Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*getfacl\s+misleading\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. getfacl misleading (score: 1)
Author: Wiktor Wodecki <wiktor.wodecki@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 16:02:52 +0200
SGI, Inc. 651-
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00163.html (8,247 bytes)

2. Re: getfacl misleading (score: 1)
Author: Wiktor Wodecki <wiktor.wodecki@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 16:07:04 +0200
-m g:group2:rwx
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00164.html (6,544 bytes)

3. Log corruption? (score: 1)
Author: ndeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 16:02:52 +0200
ly have old filesystems which mount without issues. I suspect you have a kernel configuration issue and the message you are getting is not from XFS. If XFS fails to recognize the super bloc
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00942.html (8,247 bytes)

4. can see in linux an IRIX disk or linux disk in IRIX? (score: 1)
Author: iktor.wodecki@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 16:07:04 +0200
, a change just went into the cvs tree this weekend which might be related to this, there is some zeroing of part of the log which is always supposed to happen during mount. For a readonly mo
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00943.html (6,544 bytes)

5. getfacl misleading (score: 1)
Author: Wiktor Wodecki <wiktor.wodecki@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 16:02:52 +0200
Hello, it seems that getfacl is missing default access *sometimes*. What I did: [root@file1 Controlling]# getfacl _netm/ user::rwx group::r-x other::-- [root@file1 Controlling]# setfacl -d -m g:group
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01721.html (8,247 bytes)

6. Re: getfacl misleading (score: 1)
Author: Wiktor Wodecki <wiktor.wodecki@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 16:07:04 +0200
oh please ignore my previous post, my acl utils were really old, I upgraded them to 2.0.18 and now it's working as expected :-) -- Regards, Wiktor Wodecki
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01722.html (6,544 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu