Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*file\s+corruption\s+during\s+emacs\s+build\s+on\s+XFS\s+logical\s+volume\s*$/: 186 ]

Total 186 documents matching your query.

61. ild on XFS logical volume (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 06:55:12 -0600
Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote: I see. Sorry, my fault. Do you have any idea what else I could do to further investigate *my* problem? Thanks, Ralf You are in the 'queue', unfortunately, there are not many h
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00197.html (12,216 bytes)

62. ild on XFS logical volume (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: 08 Jan 2002 08:48:35 -0600
OK, I think I will put the code in and wait to hear back from you on this one. Steve -- Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511 Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software email: lord@xxxxxxx
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00204.html (13,046 bytes)

63. happily (score: 1)
Author: @xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2002 18:16:21 +0000
I'm getting some random file corruption on one of my XFS LVM volumes, leading to things like an emacs binary that is filled with runs of NULs and pieces of deleted files. I've been able to build succ
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00941.html (8,935 bytes)

64. tion during emacs build on XFS logical volume (score: 1)
Author: ums@xxxxxxxx>
Date: 02 Jan 2002 12:18:25 -0600
How much memory do you have on this machine, and how many cpus? And can you tell if the build is doing things in parallel or is just single threaded? I don't think there is much point going back to e
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00942.html (9,950 bytes)

65. ogical volume (score: 1)
Author: n@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2002 19:30:46 +0000
begin Steve Lord quotation: 256M: two 128M DIMMs. I ran two passes of memtest a couple days ago with no errors. I have one CPU, a PII-450. The kernel is a UP build, with Robert Love's preempt patch a
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00944.html (11,306 bytes)

66. : XFS support to the -mjc 2.4.17 branch (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: ie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2002 22:22:47 +0000
begin Sean Neakums quotation: I'm now running a fresh build of 2.4.17, without the preempt patch. emacs reliably fails to build on the XFS volume, and builds successfully on the ext2 volume. -- /////
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00950.html (10,340 bytes)

67. tion during emacs build on XFS logical volume (score: 1)
Author: ums@xxxxxxxx>
Date: 02 Jan 2002 17:10:19 -0600
Doing a non lvm build here, lets see if the that works. I have my suspicions that lvm is going to be the magic factor here. Steve -- Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511 Principal Engineer, Filesystem S
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00951.html (10,593 bytes)

68. tion during emacs build on XFS logical volume (score: 1)
Author: lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2002 23:22:24 +0000
begin Steve Lord quotation: I'm using the LVM as shipped in SGI's CVS tree, which claims to be "1.0.1-rc4(ish)". As I recall, that's the version being shippedin stock 2.4.17. Is there a newer version
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00952.html (11,560 bytes)

69. tion during emacs build on XFS logical volume (score: 1)
Author: ums@xxxxxxxx>
Date: 02 Jan 2002 17:26:37 -0600
No, I was refering to XFS on top of lvm being a possible culprit, independent of lvm version. I completed an emacs build - surprisingly quickly, but I want to try a different version, I am building r
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00953.html (11,191 bytes)

70. logical volume (score: 1)
Author: lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2002 23:55:14 +0000
begin Steve Lord quotation: I've just realised that my swap is divided between two partitions. I've taken one and created an XFS filesystem on it. Building emacs now. -- ///////////////// | | The spa
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00955.html (11,404 bytes)

71. tion during emacs build on XFS logical volume (score: 1)
Author: ums@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 00:20:33 +0000
begin Sean Neakums quotation: Weird, it failed the with the same errors I was getting using the XFS LVM volume: make[2]: ** No rule to make target `/datacomp/emacs21-21.1/src/../lisp/register.elc', n
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00956.html (12,775 bytes)

72. tion during emacs build on XFS logical volume (score: 1)
Author: ums@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2002 18:10:25 -0700
FYI, file compression is extremely sensitive to marginal ram. If unpacking has anything to do with it at all, and not the source of the unpack or destination, you should double-check ram with memtest
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00957.html (13,365 bytes)

73. ly (score: 1)
Author: @xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 09:03:20 +0000
begin D. Stimits quotation: I ran two passes of memtest-86 a few days ago, after I had that XFS filesystem shutdown. I'm not getting any errors at the unpack stage. I mentioned that I was unpacking f
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00966.html (12,383 bytes)

74. S logical volume (score: 1)
Author: n@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 03 Jan 2002 08:49:37 -0600
Since I am building on a redhat based box, I am doing rpm builds not debian package builds, and the rpm version which appears friendly to this box is emacs-20 not emacs-21. Having said that, emacs is
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00968.html (13,270 bytes)

75. tion during emacs build on XFS logical volume (score: 1)
Author: lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 01:38:06 +1000
This is probabily unrelated & OT but just straight XFS on LVM seems OK in the fact that I have not seen any problems with it as yet (but then again I have not been looking for problems like file corr
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00969.html (11,201 bytes)

76. tion during emacs build on XFS logical volume (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 15:45:16 +0000
begin Steve Lord quotation: I don't even get as far as generating packages when I build on XFS; the part I mentioned about temacs re-appearing mysteriously happens during the actual emacs21 build. I
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00970.html (13,409 bytes)

77. tion during emacs build on XFS logical volume (score: 1)
Author: ums@xxxxxxxx>
Date: 03 Jan 2002 09:39:42 -0600
Following up to myself, dropping the system memory to 128M seems to have triggered the problem here, so yes there does seem to be an XFS bug here. Steve -- Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511 Principal
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00971.html (12,446 bytes)

78. tion during emacs build on XFS logical volume (score: 1)
Author: lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 03 Jan 2002 09:41:37 -0600
Yes, I have seen the thread, I have just not had the time to look into it yet. Your last message said that the xfs snapshot creation was failing, but with an ext3 stack trace..... You also mention ou
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00972.html (12,582 bytes)

79. tion during emacs build on XFS logical volume (score: 1)
Author: lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 15:56:02 +0000
begin Steve Lord quotation: Excellent. I was beginning to think that it was something specific to my setup. -- ///////////////// | | The spark of a pin <sneakums@xxxxxxxx> | (require 'gnu) | dropping
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00973.html (12,999 bytes)

80. tion during emacs build on XFS logical volume (score: 1)
Author: ums@xxxxxxxx>
Date: 03 Jan 2002 10:30:04 -0600
It gets even better, the other difference was that emacs was already installed on the box were it worked, if I remove emacs it fails to find it and fails in the same manner. So scratch memory size as
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00974.html (13,478 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu