Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*file\s+corruption\s+during\s+emacs\s+build\s+on\s+XFS\s+logical\s+volume\s*$/: 186 ]

Total 186 documents matching your query.

101. tion during emacs build on XFS logical volume (score: 1)
Author: lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2002 18:39:28 +0000
begin Sean Neakums quotation: I think I can finally reproduce the bogus dumps. I just did it here, three times. What I did was: run the io-test program above on two different files for approx three m
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01014.html (14,076 bytes)

102. tion during emacs build on XFS logical volume (score: 1)
Author: ums@xxxxxxxx>
Date: 04 Jan 2002 12:42:10 -0600
Can you expand on the 'dumps' I am not really familiar with the emacs build process, so I don't know which part of the process you are refering to here. Steve -- Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511 Pri
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01015.html (12,166 bytes)

103. on XFS logical volume (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2002 18:49:09 +0000
begin Steve Lord quotation: Of course, my bad. An Emacs binary contains a bunch of C code making up the Lisp interpeter and primitive functions (subrs) and a .data section that contains pre-loaded Li
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01017.html (12,838 bytes)

104. tion during emacs build on XFS logical volume (score: 1)
Author: ums@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2002 18:54:30 +0000
begin Sean Neakums quotation: Yep, I just got me a dumped emacs binary full of NULs with the original GNU source. -- ///////////////// | | The spark of a pin <sneakums@xxxxxxxx> | (require 'gnu) | dr
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01018.html (11,300 bytes)

105. XFS, ext3, reiserfs & LVM to coexist happily (score: 1)
Author: deen@xxxxxxx>
Date: 04 Jan 2002 14:07:51 -0600
OK, bingo, I can replicate this now, I too have a bad binary, it looks like the memory is getting reclaimed without getting flushed out to disk - which is not good at all. This actually gives me some
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01020.html (11,559 bytes)

106. tion during emacs build on XFS logical volume (score: 1)
Author: lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2002 21:26:06 +0100
OK, bingo, I can replicate this now, I too have a bad binary, it looks like the memory is getting reclaimed without getting flushed out to disk - which is not good at all. This actually gives me some
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01021.html (12,229 bytes)

107. tion during emacs build on XFS logical volume (score: 1)
Author: ie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 04 Jan 2002 14:29:53 -0600
What is the affected version with this? 2.4.17 or all? -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx "It is the part of a good shepherd
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01022.html (11,970 bytes)

108. tion during emacs build on XFS logical volume (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2002 20:34:02 +0000
begin Austin Gonyou quotation: I had the Emacs build failures on my 2.4.16 CVS pull, too. I haven't tried to reproduce on 2.4.16 with io-test.c and the manual Emacs dump. I haven't had the Emacs buil
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01023.html (10,994 bytes)

109. tion during emacs build on XFS logical volume (score: 1)
Author: ums@xxxxxxxx>
Date: 04 Jan 2002 14:33:13 -0600
Well I hit it in 2.5.2-pre7, but I suspect it goes back into 2.4.16 at least. I may have made a mistake in the changes which went in to fix various things during 2.4.16. Steve -- Steve Lord voice: +1
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01024.html (12,397 bytes)

110. ogical volume (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 04 Jan 2002 14:34:03 -0600
Sean said that 2.4.14 did not seem to be affected; it may be that a bug got pushed somewhere since then and popped out somewhere else. :) -Eric -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/projec
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01026.html (10,228 bytes)

111. al volume (score: 1)
Author: deen@xxxxxxx>
Date: 04 Jan 2002 15:28:20 -0600
It looks like the problem was introduced sometime after the original split patches for 2.4.16 were put out on Dec 3rd. So it is either related to something in the fixes for dbench on low memory syste
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01028.html (11,297 bytes)

112. XFS, ext3, reiserfs & LVM to coexist happily (score: 1)
Author: deen@xxxxxxx>
Date: 04 Jan 2002 17:36:11 -0600
I started with the initial 2.4.16 patches and kept applying fixes to them - so far I have not managed to reproduce the problem, so I am going to try a kernel from just before the 2.4.17 merge went in
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01035.html (12,280 bytes)

113. AKE - Sync kdb v2.0-2.4.17 i386 code with xfs (score: 1)
Author: lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2002 23:55:16 +0000
begin Steve Lord quotation: Sure thing, I'll get that built and tested. The 2.4.16 that's failing for me was built on the 18th December. The cvs update probably didn't happen very long before that. I
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01038.html (11,767 bytes)

114. tion during emacs build on XFS logical volume (score: 1)
Author: ums@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2002 01:53:14 +0000
begin Sean Neakums quotation: I built a Linus 2.4.16, patched for XFS with the patch from the above location, and I'm certain that the bug was not present in XFS when that patch was generated. I succ
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01039.html (13,266 bytes)

115. et financie (score: 1)
Author: icius@xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2002 13:16:47 -0600
Sean Neakums wrote: begin Sean Neakums quotation: begin Steve Lord quotation: Sean, if you could apply the xfs patches for 2.4.16 (on oss.sgi.com in the projects/xfs/download/patches/2.4.16 directory
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01050.html (13,665 bytes)

116. messes up file attributes (score: 1)
Author: ums@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2002 20:25:37 +0000
begin Stephen Lord quotation: I just found a kernel from December 8 (I had removed it from lilo.conf, but forgotten to delete the kernel itself and the modules) and I cannot recreate on that. -- ////
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01053.html (12,042 bytes)

117. ? (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 07 Jan 2002 12:51:53 -0600
Sean, can you see if the attached patch against the current cvs tree fixes the problem for you? So far I have not been able to reproduce with this change. Steve -- Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511 P
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01095.html (12,536 bytes)

118. XFS, ext3, reiserfs & LVM to coexist happily (score: 1)
Author: kaos@xxxxxxx>
Date: 07 Jan 2002 14:35:24 -0600
And here is a patch I prefer you test - since I think this is more like a real fix instead of a go back and mask the original problem again Steve -- Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511 Principal Engine
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01106.html (13,091 bytes)

119. XFS?) (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 09:08:34 +0100
[...] Steve, I tried the first fix (to the "Emacs" problem) you issued to see whether it helps with my problem, but it doesn't. I copied the old RAID over to the new one, got NO "filesystem shutdown"
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01116.html (11,766 bytes)

120. tion during emacs build on XFS logical volume (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 08:31:11 +0000
begin Steve Lord quotation: Steve, I'm afraid I've had to travel unexpectedly this week -- I won't be back at my XFS box until Friday. I'll test the patch as soon as I get back Friday. Sean -- //////
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01117.html (13,078 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu