Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*fam\s+exploit\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*fam\s+exploit\?\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. fam exploit? (score: 1): Author: Me <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 15:39:45 -0500; What do you think of this: Dec 6 16:08:07 plaguesplace fam[3044]: fd 5 message length 67181060 bytes exceeds max of 4136. Dec 6 16:08:07 plaguesplace fam[3044]: fd 6 message length 1129270862 bytes e; /archives/fam/2003-12/msg00003.html (8,020 bytes)
2. Re: fam exploit? (score: 1): Author: Alexander Larsson <alexl@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 10 Dec 2003 08:52:04 +0100; The redhat fam has: bind = 127.0.0.1 in the xinetd config. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Alexander Larsson Red Hat, Inc alexl@xxxxxxxxxx alla@xxxxxxxxxxx; /archives/fam/2003-12/msg00004.html (7,563 bytes)
3. Re: fam exploit? (score: 1): Author: Michael Raymond <mraymond@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 12:58:59 -0600; Sorry for the late reply, I've been really busy with other things. Would it make sense to change the FAM INSTALL file to include the xinetd bind option you mention? Thanks, Michael -- Michael A. Raym; /archives/fam/2003-12/msg00012.html (8,693 bytes)
4. fam exploit? (score: 1): Author: Me <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 15:39:45 -0500; What do you think of this: Dec 6 16:08:07 plaguesplace fam[3044]: fd 5 message length 67181060 bytes exceeds max of 4136. Dec 6 16:08:07 plaguesplace fam[3044]: fd 6 message length 1129270862 bytes e; /archives/fam/2003-12/msg00017.html (8,020 bytes)
5. Re: fam exploit? (score: 1): Author: Alexander Larsson <alexl@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 10 Dec 2003 08:52:04 +0100; The redhat fam has: bind = 127.0.0.1 in the xinetd config. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Alexander Larsson Red Hat, Inc alexl@xxxxxxxxxx alla@xxxxxxxxxxx; /archives/fam/2003-12/msg00018.html (7,621 bytes)
6. Re: fam exploit? (score: 1): Author: Michael Raymond <mraymond@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 12:58:59 -0600; Sorry for the late reply, I've been really busy with other things. Would it make sense to change the FAM INSTALL file to include the xinetd bind option you mention? Thanks, Michael -- Michael A. Raym; /archives/fam/2003-12/msg00026.html (8,827 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]