Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*failed\s+assertion\s+related\s+to\s+realtime\s+section\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. failed assertion related to realtime section (score: 1)
Author: Roman Kononov <kononov@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:42:43 -0500
Hi, In 2.6.30.x Linux kernel, the XFS_RT configuration option does not say "This feature is unsupported at this time..." any more. Nevertheless, when enabled, the feature crashes the file system in m
/archives/xfs/2009-07/msg00117.html (6,840 bytes)

2. Re: failed assertion related to realtime section (score: 1)
Author: Olaf Weber <olaf@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:23:06 +0200
I don't think a kernel oops is the expected result. Can you provide: - the options used to create the filesystem - the mount options of the filesystem - (a summary of) the commands run -- Olaf Weber
/archives/xfs/2009-07/msg00131.html (8,038 bytes)

3. Re: failed assertion related to realtime section (score: 1)
Author: Roman Kononov <kononov@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:15:05 -0500
- the options used to create the filesystem - the mount options of the filesystem - (a summary of) the commands run The attached bash script (xfs-doit) produces the attached output (out.txt). The ker
/archives/xfs/2009-07/msg00140.html (9,021 bytes)

4. Re: failed assertion related to realtime section (score: 1)
Author: Roman Kononov <kononov@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:04:32 -0500
With which kernel version did you run the test? Figuring out exactly when/where this regressed will take time. I went back to 2.6.23 and the same assfail happened with somewhat different call trace:
/archives/xfs/2009-08/msg00030.html (8,632 bytes)

5. Re: failed assertion related to realtime section (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 22:58:56 -0500
While realtime should probably work and not oops (!) I'm curious what your use-case for realtime is? Thanks, -Eric
/archives/xfs/2009-08/msg00035.html (7,735 bytes)

6. Re: failed assertion related to realtime section (score: 1)
Author: Roman Kononov <kononov@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 18:07:50 -0500
In my setup I need mostly sequential read/write access to a number of huge files (>1GB) as well as small ones. My 16-disk system, providing 1GB/s of sequential access data rate, chokes when file frag
/archives/xfs/2009-08/msg00046.html (8,350 bytes)

7. Re: failed assertion related to realtime section (score: 1)
Author: Roman Kononov <kononov@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 18:21:37 -0500
On 2009-07-16 05:02, Olaf Weber wrote: A quick test on an available system running a (much) older kernel runs to completion, so this appears to be a regression. With which kernel version did you run
/archives/xfs/2009-08/msg00047.html (12,598 bytes)

8. Re: failed assertion related to realtime section (score: 1)
Author: Roman Kononov <kononov@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 19:38:18 -0500
Did you have the XFS_DEBUG option on? Without it, the filesystem with realtime does not die right away, but hangs or crashes later. With which kernel version did you run the test? Heavily-patched 2.6
/archives/xfs/2009-08/msg00048.html (9,990 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu