Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*e1000\s+driver\s+problem\s+with\s+Intel\s+Pro\/1000\s+MT\s+adapter\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. ssion limit (score: 1)
Author: Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2004 00:25:39 +0100
- An 82541 at PCI 32/66. - An 82546 at PCI-X 64/100, N
/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00051.html (9,048 bytes)

2. MT adapter (score: 1)
Author: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 01:59:46 +0100
the e1000 driver (I tried both the version supplied by
/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00052.html (9,019 bytes)

3. MT adapter (score: 1)
Author: Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 02:14:44 +0100
1000_open -> request_irq That + (2) + SMP suggests an i
/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00053.html (9,455 bytes)

4. ssion limit (score: 1)
Author: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 13:03:28 +0100
rs: case overhead phi-32-33-82540-2.6.9 1.86 us phi-32-
/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00056.html (9,195 bytes)

5. MT adapter (score: 1)
Author: Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 18:20:13 +0100
nt 2.6.x will provide a different datapoint and a wider
/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00057.html (9,880 bytes)

6. mory access (score: 1)
Author: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2004 16:00:01 -0800
or the user space, but both kernel module and user prog
/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00059.html (8,998 bytes)

7. ward_alloc) (score: 1)
Author: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 00:37:19 -0800
. Without the patch we need to find two expensive machi
/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00063.html (10,474 bytes)

8. omisation (revised) (score: 1)
Author: Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 10:42:39 +0100
loopback address I agree with Stephen' conclusion, that the cost of the MD4 gets lost in the noise. I did not measure the variance, since this probably descri
/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00103.html (9,198 bytes)

9. ress family problem (score: 1)
Author: Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 12:51:51 +0100
it fixes. You need to do a lot more testing to verify it doesnt. Actually you should probably fix whats being invoked for the ifa messages when PF_UNSPEC is se
/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00108.html (9,299 bytes)

10. e1000 driver problem with Intel Pro/1000 MT adapter (score: 1)
Author: Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2004 00:25:39 +0100
Hello, I have a problem with an Intel Pro/1000 MT 4-port card in a Supermicro (non-HT) Pentium 4 system using RHEL3 (2.4.21 kernel "the RH way") with the e1000 driver (I tried both the version suppli
/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg01002.html (9,048 bytes)

11. Re: e1000 driver problem with Intel Pro/1000 MT adapter (score: 1)
Author: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 01:59:46 +0100
Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx> : [misbehaving multi port e1000] <I am not the e1000 maintainer> The error code for the ioctl most probably comes through e1000_open -> request_irq That + (2) + SMP suggests an i
/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg01003.html (9,115 bytes)

12. Re: e1000 driver problem with Intel Pro/1000 MT adapter (score: 1)
Author: Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 02:14:44 +0100
IIRC ACPI is disabled in the BIOS (not sure), but I'm using a RHEL3 2.4.21 kernel that does not support ACPI at all (due to the RH patches rebuilding the kernel with ACPI enbabled does not work anymo
/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg01004.html (9,620 bytes)

13. Re: e1000 driver problem with Intel Pro/1000 MT adapter (score: 1)
Author: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 13:03:28 +0100
Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx> : [...] 1 - Imho people at RedHat/wherever need more details (chipset, mobo, dmesg, lspci -vx, 2.4.21 savor ?). 2 - Testing recent 2.6.x will provide a different datapoint and a
/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg01007.html (9,314 bytes)

14. Re: e1000 driver problem with Intel Pro/1000 MT adapter (score: 1)
Author: Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 18:20:13 +0100
Mainboard: Supermicro P4SCT+ Output of lspci -vx: attached Red Hat kernel: 2.4.21-20.EL Yes, ok, I might install RHEL4 beta or Fedora Core 3 on it next week and see how that works. -- -- Jos Vos <jos
/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg01008.html (10,071 bytes)

15. Re: e1000 driver problem with Intel Pro/1000 MT adapter (score: 1)
Author: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2004 16:00:01 -0800
The 4-port card has two 82546 dual-port controllers behind a PCI-X bridge. Your symptoms suggest interrupt routing didn't get setup correctly for the controllers behind the bridge. I've seen more tha
/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg01010.html (9,064 bytes)

16. Re: e1000 driver problem with Intel Pro/1000 MT adapter (score: 1)
Author: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 00:37:19 -0800
I have a problem with an Intel Pro/1000 MT 4-port card in a Supermicro (non-HT) Pentium 4 system using RHEL3 (2.4.21 kernel "the RH way") with the e1000 driver (I tried both the version supplied by
/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg01014.html (10,481 bytes)

17. Re: e1000 driver problem with Intel Pro/1000 MT adapter (score: 1)
Author: Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 10:42:39 +0100
Unfortunately, the latest BIOS for the MB is already installed :-(. -- -- Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx> -- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364 -- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6
/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg01054.html (9,338 bytes)

18. Re: e1000 driver problem with Intel Pro/1000 MT adapter (score: 1)
Author: Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 12:51:51 +0100
I just a prerelease of their next BIOS from Supermicro and that seems to solve the problem! I still have to boot the SMP kernel to get APIC working, in UP mode incoming packets are not seen, but I ca
/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg01059.html (9,439 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu