Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*dst\s+cache\s+overflow\s+on\s+2\.2\.16\s+kernel\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*dst\s+cache\s+overflow\s+on\s+2\.2\.16\s+kernel\.\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. dst cache overflow on 2.2.16 kernel. (score: 1): Author: aos@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 13:59:56 +0200; Hello. We have a firewall here (Checkpoint FW 1), installed on a RH 6.2 Every week or so, the FW logs this error : dst cache overflow and the routing stops. Is changing the value of /proc/sys/net/ipv; /archives/netdev/2001-07/msg00032.html (8,427 bytes)
2. Re: dst cache overflow on 2.2.16 kernel. (score: 1): Author: d <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 01:35:26 +1200; Every week or so, the FW logs this error : dst cache overflow and the routing stops. is lo down? --cw; /archives/netdev/2001-07/msg00036.html (8,180 bytes)
3. Re: dst cache overflow on 2.2.16 kernel. (score: 1): Author: d <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 16:13:31 +0200; lo is up and running.... Now, I don't know if some rules by default of fw-1 make it looks like lo is down ... Yann Dupont. -- On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 01:59:56PM +0200, Yann Dupont wrote: Every week; /archives/netdev/2001-07/msg00037.html (8,565 bytes)
4. Re: dst cache overflow on 2.2.16 kernel. (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 02:19:25 +1200; lo is up and running.... so ping 127.0.0.1 works? Now, I don't know if some rules by default of fw-1 make it looks like lo is down ... I'm not sure I follow here, are you saying fw-1 makes it look li; /archives/netdev/2001-07/msg00038.html (8,362 bytes)
5. Re: dst cache overflow on 2.2.16 kernel. (score: 1): Author: d <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 16:37:47 +0200; yes. Sorry for my poor english ... fw-1 is a module that sits beetwen the IP layer & the interface (Well. I think it perform like this. Mayne I'm totally wrong here) So even if I can ping 127.0.0.1,; /archives/netdev/2001-07/msg00039.html (9,060 bytes)
6. Re: dst cache overflow on 2.2.16 kernel. (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 02:52:51 +1200; Sorry for my poor english ... Mine is probably worse. fw-1 is a module that sits beetwen the IP layer & the interface (Well. I think it perform like this. Mayne I'm totally wrong here) I assume it wo; /archives/netdev/2001-07/msg00040.html (8,762 bytes)
7. Re: dst cache overflow on 2.2.16 kernel. (score: 1): Author: kas@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 17:30:05 +0200; You can increase the /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_thresh sysctl trying to work around it, but likely it's a bug in the FW-1 kernel module. I would talk to Checkpoint. -Andi; /archives/netdev/2001-07/msg00048.html (8,777 bytes)
8. Re: dst cache overflow on 2.2.16 kernel. (score: 1): Author: ewm@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 07:26:08 -0400 (EDT); He might be having problems with route table not getting enough nh entries because of small neigh tables. obviously FW1 is doing something weird: Yann, try to increment the sizes of the arp tables, e; /archives/netdev/2001-07/msg00065.html (9,223 bytes)
9. Re: dst cache overflow on 2.2.16 kernel. (score: 1): Author: sov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: 24 Jul 2001 10:46:23 +0200; Thanks to all for all the advices. I'd like to understand the meaning of gc_thresh1,2,3 ... gc_thresh is something like garbage collection threshold ? So what's the meaning of 1,2,3 ? For the moment,; /archives/netdev/2001-07/msg00074.html (10,242 bytes)
10. dst cache overflow on 2.2.16 kernel. (score: 1): Author: Yann Dupont <Yann.Dupont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 13:59:56 +0200; Hello. We have a firewall here (Checkpoint FW 1), installed on a RH 6.2 Every week or so, the FW logs this error : dst cache overflow and the routing stops. Is changing the value of /proc/sys/net/ipv; /archives/netdev/2001-07/msg00209.html (8,431 bytes)
11. Re: dst cache overflow on 2.2.16 kernel. (score: 1): Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 01:35:26 +1200; Every week or so, the FW logs this error : dst cache overflow and the routing stops. is lo down? --cw; /archives/netdev/2001-07/msg00213.html (8,228 bytes)
12. Re: dst cache overflow on 2.2.16 kernel. (score: 1): Author: Yann Dupont <Yann.Dupont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 16:13:31 +0200; Hello... lo is up and running.... Now, I don't know if some rules by default of fw-1 make it looks like lo is down ... Yann Dupont. -- On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 01:59:56PM +0200, Yann Dupont wrote: Eve; /archives/netdev/2001-07/msg00214.html (8,315 bytes)
13. Re: dst cache overflow on 2.2.16 kernel. (score: 1): Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 02:19:25 +1200; lo is up and running.... so ping 127.0.0.1 works? Now, I don't know if some rules by default of fw-1 make it looks like lo is down ... I'm not sure I follow here, are you saying fw-1 makes it look li; /archives/netdev/2001-07/msg00215.html (8,410 bytes)
14. Re: dst cache overflow on 2.2.16 kernel. (score: 1): Author: Yann Dupont <Yann.Dupont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 16:37:47 +0200; yes. Sorry for my poor english ... fw-1 is a module that sits beetwen the IP layer & the interface (Well. I think it perform like this. Mayne I'm totally wrong here) So even if I can ping 127.0.0.1,; /archives/netdev/2001-07/msg00216.html (8,996 bytes)
15. Re: dst cache overflow on 2.2.16 kernel. (score: 1): Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 02:52:51 +1200; Sorry for my poor english ... Mine is probably worse. fw-1 is a module that sits beetwen the IP layer & the interface (Well. I think it perform like this. Mayne I'm totally wrong here) I assume it wo; /archives/netdev/2001-07/msg00217.html (8,810 bytes)
16. Re: dst cache overflow on 2.2.16 kernel. (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 17:30:05 +0200; You can increase the /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_thresh sysctl trying to work around it, but likely it's a bug in the FW-1 kernel module. I would talk to Checkpoint. -Andi; /archives/netdev/2001-07/msg00225.html (8,872 bytes)
17. Re: dst cache overflow on 2.2.16 kernel. (score: 1): Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 07:26:08 -0400 (EDT); He might be having problems with route table not getting enough nh entries because of small neigh tables. obviously FW1 is doing something weird: Yann, try to increment the sizes of the arp tables, e; /archives/netdev/2001-07/msg00242.html (9,252 bytes)
18. Re: dst cache overflow on 2.2.16 kernel. (score: 1): Author: Yann Dupont <Yann.Dupont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 24 Jul 2001 10:46:23 +0200; Thanks to all for all the advices. I'd like to understand the meaning of gc_thresh1,2,3 ... gc_thresh is something like garbage collection threshold ? So what's the meaning of 1,2,3 ? For the moment,; /archives/netdev/2001-07/msg00251.html (10,351 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]