Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*dm_handle_to_path\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. dm_handle_to_path (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 13:59:31 -0600
dm_handle_to_path() is listed as a DMAPI function that does not work. Is this because nobody knows how to write it or just because nobody has really needed it yet? If it's the second case, would it b
/archives/xfs/2003-01/msg00157.html (7,489 bytes)

2. Re: dm_handle_to_path (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 20:02:49 +0000
A quick grep over the source tree seems to imply it's implemented.
/archives/xfs/2003-01/msg00158.html (8,073 bytes)

3. Re: dm_handle_to_path (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 14:51:00 -0600
dm_handle_to_path ... James Goodwin....dm_handle_to_path.... Must have been a nightmare. But if Christoph say's it's done, then maybe it wasn't... Dean
/archives/xfs/2003-01/msg00162.html (7,719 bytes)

4. Re: dm_handle_to_path (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 21:01:18 +0000
Hey, _you_ are the dmapi guru, right? :) I just said there is an implementation in libdm, I can't/won't comment on how good it works..
/archives/xfs/2003-01/msg00164.html (8,132 bytes)

5. Re: dm_handle_to_path (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:35:42 -0600
I had forgotten about the Status file--it's out of date. Dean
/archives/xfs/2003-01/msg00183.html (7,578 bytes)

6. Re: dm_handle_to_path (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:18:49 -0600
I remember asking about this call before, but I seem to remember that the implementation only worked under certain circumstances. Is that still the case, or does it really work now? It's still liste
/archives/xfs/2003-01/msg00186.html (9,457 bytes)

7. Re: dm_handle_to_path (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 12:37:29 -0600
So are you saying that dm_handle_to_path works now? That would be excellent news. -James Goodwin Software Engineer IBM Global Services - Federal jagoodwi@xxxxxxxxxx Phone: (281) 336 2578 Fax: (281) 3
/archives/xfs/2003-01/msg00188.html (9,118 bytes)

8. Re: dm_handle_to_path (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 13:11:23 -0600
It was working last May, I believe. Dean
/archives/xfs/2003-01/msg00189.html (7,314 bytes)

9. dm_handle_to_path (score: 1)
Author: xxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 13:59:31 -0600
dm_handle_to_path() is listed as a DMAPI function that does not work. Is this because nobody knows how to write it or just because nobody has really needed it yet? If it's the second case, would it b
/archives/xfs/2003-01/msg00457.html (7,489 bytes)

10. Re: dm_handle_to_path (score: 1)
Author: xxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 20:02:49 +0000
A quick grep over the source tree seems to imply it's implemented.
/archives/xfs/2003-01/msg00458.html (8,073 bytes)

11. Re: dm_handle_to_path (score: 1)
Author: xxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 14:51:00 -0600
dm_handle_to_path ... James Goodwin....dm_handle_to_path.... Must have been a nightmare. But if Christoph say's it's done, then maybe it wasn't... Dean
/archives/xfs/2003-01/msg00462.html (7,719 bytes)

12. Re: dm_handle_to_path (score: 1)
Author: xxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 21:01:18 +0000
Hey, _you_ are the dmapi guru, right? :) I just said there is an implementation in libdm, I can't/won't comment on how good it works..
/archives/xfs/2003-01/msg00464.html (8,132 bytes)

13. Re: dm_handle_to_path (score: 1)
Author: @xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:35:42 -0600
I had forgotten about the Status file--it's out of date. Dean
/archives/xfs/2003-01/msg00483.html (7,578 bytes)

14. Re: dm_handle_to_path (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:18:49 -0600
I remember asking about this call before, but I seem to remember that the implementation only worked under certain circumstances. Is that still the case, or does it really work now? It's still liste
/archives/xfs/2003-01/msg00486.html (9,457 bytes)

15. Re: dm_handle_to_path (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 12:37:29 -0600
So are you saying that dm_handle_to_path works now? That would be excellent news. -James Goodwin Software Engineer IBM Global Services - Federal jagoodwi@xxxxxxxxxx Phone: (281) 336 2578 Fax: (281) 3
/archives/xfs/2003-01/msg00488.html (9,118 bytes)

16. Re: dm_handle_to_path (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 13:11:23 -0600
It was working last May, I believe. Dean
/archives/xfs/2003-01/msg00489.html (7,314 bytes)

17. ion (score: 1)
Author: "James A Goodwin" <jagoodwi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 15:23:20 -0600
I've found another one. The dm_handle_to_path() call gives an EBADF any time you supply the same directory handle for both the directory and target arguments. I've looked at the libdm code and the i
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00308.html (7,188 bytes)

18. ion (score: 1)
Author: Dean Roehrich <roehrich@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 15:55:06 -0600
Sure, here's an old note I have on that. I'm still amazed that handle_to_path exists. Should never have been in the spec, if you ask me :) What are you going to do when someone mounts the filesystem
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00311.html (9,178 bytes)

19. uestion (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 15:23:20 -0600
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00882.html (7,188 bytes)

20. uestion (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 15:55:06 -0600
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00885.html (9,178 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu