- 1. Re: default acl inheritence bug (score: 1)
- Author: >
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 04:11:11 -0800
- i fiddled around with it for well over an hour trying to stop this behavior, i am quite certain about the above results (which are copy/pasted directly from my tty). in between tests i always complet
- /archives/xfs/2002-04/msg00433.html (17,263 bytes)
- 2. Re: default acl inheritence bug (score: 1)
- Author: >
- Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 19:02:21 -0800
- i assume you used current CVS XFS? im on 2.4.18 split patches, so perhaps this is already fixed, ill check again when 2.4.19 is released. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ Attachment:
- /archives/xfs/2002-04/msg00478.html (11,294 bytes)
- 3. Re: default acl inheritence bug (score: 1)
- Author: >
- Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 13:24:02 +1000
- Yep. Perhaps. (But I've never seen this as a bug before - so there were no intentional fixes AFAIK.) --Tim
- /archives/xfs/2002-04/msg00479.html (10,914 bytes)
- 4. Re: default acl inheritence bug (score: 1)
- Author: >
- Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 20:04:58 -0800
- your test is wrong, thats the problem, if you create a directory with your default acl then user tes won't have execute permission to it: eb@dogbert /home/eb/test$ getfacl . user::rwx group::r-x othe
- /archives/xfs/2002-04/msg00480.html (12,036 bytes)
- 5. Re: default acl inheritence bug (score: 1)
- Author: >
- Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 18:28:46 +1000
- I don't understand your problem then. My example was based on your example for creating a file in the directory. And your example showed the file gaining the execute permission on a user ACE - which
- /archives/xfs/2002-04/msg00483.html (13,406 bytes)
- 6. Re: default acl inheritence bug (score: 1)
- Author: >
- Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 10:50:31 -0400 (EDT)
- I do not see this behavior either (using code from CVS about 4/18) [root@jtsdell xfs_part]# getfacl test_dir user::rwx group::r-x other::r-x default:user::rwx default:user:a100:r-- default:group::r-x
- /archives/xfs/2002-04/msg00493.html (11,412 bytes)
- 7. Re: default acl inheritence bug (score: 1)
- Author: >
- Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 14:33:30 -0800
- ^^^^ and this is not broken? -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ Attachment: pgpN9glqBrXz3.pgp Description: PGP signature
- /archives/xfs/2002-04/msg00498.html (9,635 bytes)
- 8. Re: default acl inheritence bug (score: 1)
- Author: >
- Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 20:34:02 -0400 (EDT)
- Er... um... I don't think so. I had an access and a default acl on the parent directory of user::rwx group::r-x other::r-x default:user::rwx default:user:a100:r-- default:group::r-x default:mask::r-x
- /archives/xfs/2002-04/msg00504.html (10,019 bytes)
- 9. Re: default acl inheritence bug (score: 1)
- Author: >
- Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 22:22:03 -0800
- so please explain how to set a default acl which will grant user a100 r-- for newly created files and r-x for newly created directories. the way i read this #2 should ensure that execute permission i
- /archives/xfs/2002-04/msg00511.html (10,429 bytes)
- 10. Re: default acl inheritence bug (score: 1)
- Author: >
- Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 17:14:28 +1000
- Hi Ethan, You can't. This is not a bug - it is the way it is :) You'd really need separate defaul ACLs for files and dirs as you suggested earlier. And as mentioned previously, this kind of thing is
- /archives/xfs/2002-04/msg00512.html (10,852 bytes)
- 11. Re: default acl inheritence bug (score: 1)
- Author: >
- Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 23:30:29 -0800
- that is broken. which is what should be done then IMO. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ Attachment: pgpTjoolHXTwk.pgp Description: PGP signature
- /archives/xfs/2002-04/msg00513.html (10,245 bytes)
- 12. Re: default acl inheritence bug (score: 1)
- Author: xx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 04:11:11 -0800
- i fiddled around with it for well over an hour trying to stop this behavior, i am quite certain about the above results (which are copy/pasted directly from my tty). in between tests i always complet
- /archives/xfs/2002-04/msg00977.html (17,263 bytes)
- 13. Re: default acl inheritence bug (score: 1)
- Author: xx>
- Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 19:02:21 -0800
- i assume you used current CVS XFS? im on 2.4.18 split patches, so perhaps this is already fixed, ill check again when 2.4.19 is released. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ Attachment:
- /archives/xfs/2002-04/msg01022.html (11,294 bytes)
- 14. Re: default acl inheritence bug (score: 1)
- Author: xx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 13:24:02 +1000
- Yep. Perhaps. (But I've never seen this as a bug before - so there were no intentional fixes AFAIK.) --Tim
- /archives/xfs/2002-04/msg01023.html (10,914 bytes)
- 15. Re: default acl inheritence bug (score: 1)
- Author: xx>
- Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 20:04:58 -0800
- your test is wrong, thats the problem, if you create a directory with your default acl then user tes won't have execute permission to it: eb@dogbert /home/eb/test$ getfacl . user::rwx group::r-x othe
- /archives/xfs/2002-04/msg01024.html (12,036 bytes)
- 16. Re: default acl inheritence bug (score: 1)
- Author: xx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 18:28:46 +1000
- I don't understand your problem then. My example was based on your example for creating a file in the directory. And your example showed the file gaining the execute permission on a user ACE - which
- /archives/xfs/2002-04/msg01027.html (13,406 bytes)
- 17. Re: default acl inheritence bug (score: 1)
- Author: xx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 10:50:31 -0400 (EDT)
- I do not see this behavior either (using code from CVS about 4/18) [root@jtsdell xfs_part]# getfacl test_dir user::rwx group::r-x other::r-x default:user::rwx default:user:a100:r-- default:group::r-x
- /archives/xfs/2002-04/msg01037.html (11,412 bytes)
- 18. Re: default acl inheritence bug (score: 1)
- Author: xx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 14:33:30 -0800
- ^^^^ and this is not broken? -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ Attachment: pgpE6py34oDDs.pgp Description: PGP signature
- /archives/xfs/2002-04/msg01042.html (9,635 bytes)
- 19. Re: default acl inheritence bug (score: 1)
- Author: xx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 20:34:02 -0400 (EDT)
- Er... um... I don't think so. I had an access and a default acl on the parent directory of user::rwx group::r-x other::r-x default:user::rwx default:user:a100:r-- default:group::r-x default:mask::r-x
- /archives/xfs/2002-04/msg01048.html (10,019 bytes)
- 20. Re: default acl inheritence bug (score: 1)
- Author: xx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 22:22:03 -0800
- so please explain how to set a default acl which will grant user a100 r-- for newly created files and r-x for newly created directories. the way i read this #2 should ensure that execute permission i
- /archives/xfs/2002-04/msg01055.html (10,429 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu