- 1. compilation failure (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Wray" <steve.wray@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 18:31:47 +1200
- On Mandrake 8.0 system, got the release 1 thru CVS, configured and tried make dep clean bzImage modules make modules chokes and dies with: make[2]: Nothing to be done for `modules'. make[2]: Leaving
- /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00141.html (9,492 bytes)
- 2. Re: compilation failure (score: 1)
- Author: "Nathan Scott" <nathans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 16:48:33 -0500
- Try compiling with gcc 2.91.66 (or get either the kgcc or egcs-compat rpm, both of which are 2.91.66 I think). If you want to stick with your current compiler, you'll need to use the development cvs
- /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00143.html (11,438 bytes)
- 3. Re: compilation failure (score: 1)
- Author: Chmouel Boudjnah <chmouel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 03 May 2001 09:24:33 +0100
- You compile it with a gcc-2.96 use kgcc from the egcs package.
- /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00147.html (8,603 bytes)
- 4. Re: compilation failure (score: 1)
- Author: Chmouel Boudjnah <chmouel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 03 May 2001 09:29:43 +0100
- Would be possible to make this changes in the FAQ : -- /tmp/faq Thu May 3 09:25:24 2001 +++ /tmp/faq.new Thu May 3 09:29:06 2001 @@ -1,12 +1,15 @@ Q: Are there any known issues about gcc 2.95 for com
- /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00148.html (9,491 bytes)
- 5. RE: compilation failure (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Wray" <steve.wray@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 22:24:49 +1200
- Sorry, I had been under the (obviously mistaken) impression that since I had the latest release of Mandrake, that it would have a (default) C compiler that actually compiled basic things like the ker
- /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00154.html (10,189 bytes)
- 6. Re: compilation failure (score: 1)
- Author: Chmouel Boudjnah <chmouel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 03 May 2001 12:29:41 +0100
- the problem is only when compiler XFS not the kernel himsef. ?????????, it's not a bug but a "Distribution design features <sigh>"
- /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00155.html (8,433 bytes)
- 7. Re: compilation failure (score: 1)
- Author: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 03 May 2001 20:51:53 +1000
- The kernel is notorious as being a bad test case for gcc. There are unusual C and assembler constructs that are ambiguously defined or simply not in the gcc documentation but happen to work. Most peo
- /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00157.html (8,601 bytes)
- 8. compilation failure (score: 1)
- Author: een@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 18:31:47 +1200
- On Mandrake 8.0 system, got the release 1 thru CVS, configured and tried make dep clean bzImage modules make modules chokes and dies with: make[2]: Nothing to be done for `modules'. make[2]: Leaving
- /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01505.html (9,492 bytes)
- 9. Re: compilation failure (score: 1)
- Author: rin@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 16:48:33 -0500
- Try compiling with gcc 2.91.66 (or get either the kgcc or egcs-compat rpm, both of which are 2.91.66 I think). If you want to stick with your current compiler, you'll need to use the development cvs
- /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01507.html (11,438 bytes)
- 10. Re: compilation failure (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 03 May 2001 09:24:33 +0100
- You compile it with a gcc-2.96 use kgcc from the egcs package.
- /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01511.html (8,603 bytes)
- 11. Re: compilation failure (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 03 May 2001 09:29:43 +0100
- Would be possible to make this changes in the FAQ : -- /tmp/faq Thu May 3 09:25:24 2001 +++ /tmp/faq.new Thu May 3 09:29:06 2001 @@ -1,12 +1,15 @@ Q: Are there any known issues about gcc 2.95 for com
- /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01512.html (9,491 bytes)
- 12. RE: compilation failure (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 22:24:49 +1200
- Sorry, I had been under the (obviously mistaken) impression that since I had the latest release of Mandrake, that it would have a (default) C compiler that actually compiled basic things like the ker
- /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01518.html (10,189 bytes)
- 13. Re: compilation failure (score: 1)
- Author: @xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 03 May 2001 12:29:41 +0100
- the problem is only when compiler XFS not the kernel himsef. ?????????, it's not a bug but a "Distribution design features <sigh>"
- /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01519.html (8,433 bytes)
- 14. Re: compilation failure (score: 1)
- Author: @xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 03 May 2001 20:51:53 +1000
- The kernel is notorious as being a bad test case for gcc. There are unusual C and assembler constructs that are ambiguously defined or simply not in the gcc documentation but happen to work. Most peo
- /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01521.html (8,601 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu