Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*changing\s+MTU\s+on\s+b44\s+breaks\s+eth0\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. Re: changing MTU on b44 breaks eth0 (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 22:53:35 +0200
Heh Thanks for the report. Looking at the code and previous bugs in it, I can safely say I found the problem and a few similar ones that could be triggered when using ethtool :-) Anyway, here's a (un
/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00025.html (11,259 bytes)

2. Re: changing MTU on b44 breaks eth0 (score: 1)
Author: vem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 15:16:18 -0800
I think Jeff should merge this upstrea, but I really disagree with the CONFIG_PM ifdefs for the power-management support.
/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00029.html (8,376 bytes)

3. Re: changing MTU on b44 breaks eth0 (score: 1)
Author: vem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 13:15:55 +0200
Fine with me (patch with CONFIG_PM removed included) Oh btw., when trying out whether the new code even compiles/loads I got the following in rmmod, does it look like something caused by generic code
/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00030.html (14,118 bytes)

4. Re: changing MTU on b44 breaks eth0 (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 09:13:55 -0800
free_netdev() is being invoked before the device registration state advanced to NETREG_UNREGISTERED, likely unregister_netdev() has not been called first or a bogus pointer was passed into the routin
/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00037.html (8,824 bytes)

5. Re: changing MTU on b44 breaks eth0 (score: 1)
Author: vem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 23:19:37 +0200
Ah, like a missing SET_NETDEV_DEV? :-) I still got reliable rtnetlink_fill_ifinfo oopses (quick debugging showed strlen(dev->qdisc_sleeping->ops->id); to be the location of the oops), which went away
/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00039.html (12,069 bytes)

6. Re: changing MTU on b44 breaks eth0 (score: 1)
Author: <pp@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 13:20:17 -0800
Wonderful, Jeff please integrate this b44 patch from Pekka.
/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00040.html (9,133 bytes)

7. Re: changing MTU on b44 breaks eth0 (score: 1)
Author: ler" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 16:36:40 -0500
David S. Miller wrote: On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 23:19:37 +0200 Pekka Pietikainen <pp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 09:13:55AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: free_netdev() is being invoked befor
/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00068.html (10,193 bytes)

8. Re: changing MTU on b44 breaks eth0 (score: 1)
Author: zik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 13:35:16 -0800
The most recent one did, I'll forward to you under seperate cover.
/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00069.html (9,194 bytes)

9. Re: changing MTU on b44 breaks eth0 (score: 1)
Author: ler" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 23:02:44 +0100
Hi all, sorry for the late answer. I tried to apply the patch mentionned below, and it reject at Hunk #1. I run linux 2.4.22, my b44.c carry version 0.9. Can you please send me the full b44.c file so
/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00097.html (16,934 bytes)

10. Re: changing MTU on b44 breaks eth0 (score: 1)
Author: Pekka Pietikainen <pp@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 22:53:35 +0200
Heh Thanks for the report. Looking at the code and previous bugs in it, I can safely say I found the problem and a few similar ones that could be triggered when using ethtool :-) Anyway, here's a (un
/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00638.html (11,379 bytes)

11. Re: changing MTU on b44 breaks eth0 (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 15:16:18 -0800
I think Jeff should merge this upstrea, but I really disagree with the CONFIG_PM ifdefs for the power-management support.
/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00642.html (8,494 bytes)

12. Re: changing MTU on b44 breaks eth0 (score: 1)
Author: Pekka Pietikainen <pp@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 13:15:55 +0200
Fine with me (patch with CONFIG_PM removed included) Oh btw., when trying out whether the new code even compiles/loads I got the following in rmmod, does it look like something caused by generic code
/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00643.html (14,281 bytes)

13. Re: changing MTU on b44 breaks eth0 (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 09:13:55 -0800
free_netdev() is being invoked before the device registration state advanced to NETREG_UNREGISTERED, likely unregister_netdev() has not been called first or a bogus pointer was passed into the routin
/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00650.html (9,010 bytes)

14. Re: changing MTU on b44 breaks eth0 (score: 1)
Author: Pekka Pietikainen <pp@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 23:19:37 +0200
Ah, like a missing SET_NETDEV_DEV? :-) I still got reliable rtnetlink_fill_ifinfo oopses (quick debugging showed strlen(dev->qdisc_sleeping->ops->id); to be the location of the oops), which went away
/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00652.html (12,299 bytes)

15. Re: changing MTU on b44 breaks eth0 (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 13:20:17 -0800
Wonderful, Jeff please integrate this b44 patch from Pekka.
/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00653.html (9,384 bytes)

16. Re: changing MTU on b44 breaks eth0 (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 16:36:40 -0500
free_netdev() is being invoked before the device registration state advanced to NETREG_UNREGISTERED, likely unregister_netdev() has not been called first or a bogus pointer was passed into the routi
/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00681.html (10,427 bytes)

17. Re: changing MTU on b44 breaks eth0 (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 13:35:16 -0800
The most recent one did, I'll forward to you under seperate cover.
/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00682.html (9,501 bytes)

18. Re: changing MTU on b44 breaks eth0 (score: 1)
Author: Charles Bueche <charles@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 23:02:44 +0100
Hi all, sorry for the late answer. I tried to apply the patch mentionned below, and it reject at Hunk #1. I run linux 2.4.22, my b44.c carry version 0.9. Can you please send me the full b44.c file so
/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00710.html (17,120 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu