this morning I woke up to a system without /home, the reason being: piper:~# mount /dev/mapper/vg0-home [308] mount: Unknown error 990 piper:~# dmesg | tail -20 [32,309] Starting XFS recovery on fil
FYI, here is how I fixed it, using LVM snapshots to ensure that xfs_repair -L would produce acceptable results: http://blog.madduck.net/geek/2006.08.30-lvm-for-filesystem-recovery I'd still be intere
Hi Martin, In this particular case, the log written is corrupted. That's why, forcing to make the inode going corrupt would not help. The real issue is why log content is not valid. By any chance, di
also sprach Shailendra Tripathi <stripathi@xxxxxxxxx> [2006.08.30.1551 +0200]: No, definitely not. Thanks for the info. I managed to restore the filesystem with xfs_repair -L in the mean time (see fo
martin f krafft wrote: Btw: there's the xfs and linux-xfs mailing list, and I am confused about whether they're separate or merged, and which one I should be using. If you have any input, I'd love to
this morning I woke up to a system without /home, the reason being: piper:~# mount /dev/mapper/vg0-home [308] mount: Unknown error 990 piper:~# dmesg | tail -20 [32,309] Starting XFS recovery on fil
FYI, here is how I fixed it, using LVM snapshots to ensure that xfs_repair -L would produce acceptable results: http://blog.madduck.net/geek/2006.08.30-lvm-for-filesystem-recovery I'd still be intere
Hi Martin, In this particular case, the log written is corrupted. That's why, forcing to make the inode going corrupt would not help. The real issue is why log content is not valid. By any chance, di
also sprach Shailendra Tripathi <stripathi@xxxxxxxxx> [2006.08.30.1551 +0200]: No, definitely not. Thanks for the info. I managed to restore the filesystem with xfs_repair -L in the mean time (see fo
martin f krafft wrote: Btw: there's the xfs and linux-xfs mailing list, and I am confused about whether they're separate or merged, and which one I should be using. If you have any input, I'd love to