Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*best\s+kernel\s+version\s+to\s+use\s+with\s+XFS\+LVM\+MD\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. les (score: 1)
Author: "mai99bxd" <mai99bxd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 17:52:12 +0100
Hi all, I'm going to plan a fileserver with 2 45Gb IDE disks in soft RAID1 and 4 100GB IDE disks in soft RAID5. I would take the RAID1 for system and the RAID5 for storage. The 300GB RADI5 space shou
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00198.html (8,438 bytes)

2. ufs (score: 1)
Author: "Bernhard R. Erdmann" <be@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 20:26:31 +0100
I'm using here 2.4.14, LVM (1.0.1rc4), MD and XFS. 4*17 GB in RAID5. No problems yet. Just one: since I tried to build a second raid array (2*1 GB RAID1 for XFS log volumes) and use it for a second
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00204.html (9,173 bytes)

3. 5.x (score: 1)
Author: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 11 Feb 2002 14:15:48 -0600
This is something that was seen on the LVM list as well. I don't remember what the fix was, if there was one, but a pvmove was working there as well. -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetr
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00207.html (10,045 bytes)

4. re9 (score: 1)
Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 23:00:41 +0100
At 17:52 11-2-2002 +0100, mai99bxd wrote: Hi all, I'm going to plan a fileserver with 2 45Gb IDE disks in soft RAID1 and 4 100GB IDE disks in soft RAID5. I would take the RAID1 for system and the RAI
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00219.html (10,128 bytes)

5. re9 (score: 1)
Author: "Bernhard R. Erdmann" <be@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 23:16:43 +0100
These contributed kernels are just RedHat + XFS. No LVM. I should have known this before I upgraded our department server heavily using LVM and rebooted at 9:15h am. :-(
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00222.html (8,864 bytes)

6. b files (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 17:52:12 +0100
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00772.html (8,438 bytes)

7. agebufs (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 20:26:31 +0100
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00778.html (9,173 bytes)

8. f 2.5.x (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: 11 Feb 2002 14:15:48 -0600
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00781.html (10,045 bytes)

9. 18-pre9 (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 23:00:41 +0100
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00793.html (10,128 bytes)

10. 18-pre9 (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 23:16:43 +0100
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00796.html (8,864 bytes)

11. best kernel version to use with XFS+LVM+MD (score: 1)
Author: "mai99bxd" <mai99bxd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 17:52:12 +0100
Hi all, I'm going to plan a fileserver with 2 45Gb IDE disks in soft RAID1 and 4 100GB IDE disks in soft RAID5. I would take the RAID1 for system and the RAID5 for storage. The 300GB RADI5 space shou
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01346.html (8,468 bytes)

12. Re: best kernel version to use with XFS+LVM+MD (score: 1)
Author: "Bernhard R. Erdmann" <be@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 20:26:31 +0100
I'm using here 2.4.14, LVM (1.0.1rc4), MD and XFS. 4*17 GB in RAID5. No problems yet. Just one: since I tried to build a second raid array (2*1 GB RAID1 for XFS log volumes) and use it for a second
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01352.html (9,243 bytes)

13. Re: best kernel version to use with XFS+LVM+MD (score: 1)
Author: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 11 Feb 2002 14:15:48 -0600
This is something that was seen on the LVM list as well. I don't remember what the fix was, if there was one, but a pvmove was working there as well. -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetr
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01355.html (10,095 bytes)

14. Re: best kernel version to use with XFS+LVM+MD (score: 1)
Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 23:00:41 +0100
I'm going to plan a fileserver with 2 45Gb IDE disks in soft RAID1 and 4 100GB IDE disks in soft RAID5. I would take the RAID1 for system and the RAID5 for storage. The 300GB RADI5 space should be di
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01367.html (10,391 bytes)

15. Re: best kernel version to use with XFS+LVM+MD (score: 1)
Author: "Bernhard R. Erdmann" <be@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 23:16:43 +0100
These contributed kernels are just RedHat + XFS. No LVM. I should have known this before I upgraded our department server heavily using LVM and rebooted at 9:15h am. :-(
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01370.html (8,920 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu