Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*best\s+kernel\s+version\s+to\s+use\s+with\s+XFS\+LVM\+MD\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*best\s+kernel\s+version\s+to\s+use\s+with\s+XFS\+LVM\+MD\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. les (score: 1): Author: "mai99bxd" <mai99bxd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 17:52:12 +0100; Hi all, I'm going to plan a fileserver with 2 45Gb IDE disks in soft RAID1 and 4 100GB IDE disks in soft RAID5. I would take the RAID1 for system and the RAID5 for storage. The 300GB RADI5 space shou; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00198.html (8,438 bytes)
2. ufs (score: 1): Author: "Bernhard R. Erdmann" <be@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 20:26:31 +0100; I'm using here 2.4.14, LVM (1.0.1rc4), MD and XFS. 4*17 GB in RAID5. No problems yet. Just one: since I tried to build a second raid array (2*1 GB RAID1 for XFS log volumes) and use it for a second; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00204.html (9,173 bytes)
3. 5.x (score: 1): Author: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 11 Feb 2002 14:15:48 -0600; This is something that was seen on the LVM list as well. I don't remember what the fix was, if there was one, but a pvmove was working there as well. -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetr; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00207.html (10,045 bytes)
4. re9 (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 23:00:41 +0100; At 17:52 11-2-2002 +0100, mai99bxd wrote: Hi all, I'm going to plan a fileserver with 2 45Gb IDE disks in soft RAID1 and 4 100GB IDE disks in soft RAID5. I would take the RAID1 for system and the RAI; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00219.html (10,128 bytes)
5. re9 (score: 1): Author: "Bernhard R. Erdmann" <be@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 23:16:43 +0100; These contributed kernels are just RedHat + XFS. No LVM. I should have known this before I upgraded our department server heavily using LVM and rebooted at 9:15h am. :-(; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00222.html (8,864 bytes)
6. b files (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 17:52:12 +0100; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00772.html (8,438 bytes)
7. agebufs (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 20:26:31 +0100; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00778.html (9,173 bytes)
8. f 2.5.x (score: 1): Author: >; Date: 11 Feb 2002 14:15:48 -0600; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00781.html (10,045 bytes)
9. 18-pre9 (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 23:00:41 +0100; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00793.html (10,128 bytes)
10. 18-pre9 (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 23:16:43 +0100; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00796.html (8,864 bytes)
11. best kernel version to use with XFS+LVM+MD (score: 1): Author: "mai99bxd" <mai99bxd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 17:52:12 +0100; Hi all, I'm going to plan a fileserver with 2 45Gb IDE disks in soft RAID1 and 4 100GB IDE disks in soft RAID5. I would take the RAID1 for system and the RAID5 for storage. The 300GB RADI5 space shou; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01346.html (8,468 bytes)
12. Re: best kernel version to use with XFS+LVM+MD (score: 1): Author: "Bernhard R. Erdmann" <be@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 20:26:31 +0100; I'm using here 2.4.14, LVM (1.0.1rc4), MD and XFS. 4*17 GB in RAID5. No problems yet. Just one: since I tried to build a second raid array (2*1 GB RAID1 for XFS log volumes) and use it for a second; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01352.html (9,243 bytes)
13. Re: best kernel version to use with XFS+LVM+MD (score: 1): Author: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 11 Feb 2002 14:15:48 -0600; This is something that was seen on the LVM list as well. I don't remember what the fix was, if there was one, but a pvmove was working there as well. -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetr; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01355.html (10,095 bytes)
14. Re: best kernel version to use with XFS+LVM+MD (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 23:00:41 +0100; I'm going to plan a fileserver with 2 45Gb IDE disks in soft RAID1 and 4 100GB IDE disks in soft RAID5. I would take the RAID1 for system and the RAID5 for storage. The 300GB RADI5 space should be di; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01367.html (10,391 bytes)
15. Re: best kernel version to use with XFS+LVM+MD (score: 1): Author: "Bernhard R. Erdmann" <be@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 23:16:43 +0100; These contributed kernels are just RedHat + XFS. No LVM. I should have known this before I upgraded our department server heavily using LVM and rebooted at 9:15h am. :-(; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01370.html (8,920 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]