Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*benchmark\s+results\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*benchmark\s+results\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. benchmark results (score: 1): Author: Christian Kujau <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 02:31:10 -0800 (PST); I've had the chance to use a testsystem here and couldn't resist running a few benchmark programs on them: bonnie++, tiobench, dbench and a few generic ones (cp/rm/tar/etc...) on ext{234}, btrfs, jfs; /archives/xfs/2009-12/msg00236.html (8,126 bytes)
2. Re: benchmark results (score: 1): Author: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 21:06:45 +0900 (JST); I looked at the log but couldn't identify the error. Is that a disk full? Thanks, Ryusuke Konishi; /archives/xfs/2009-12/msg00237.html (8,974 bytes)
3. Re: benchmark results (score: 1): Author: Teran McKinney <sega01@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 12:59:20 +0000; Which I/O scheduler are you using? Pretty sure that ReiserFS is a little less deadlocky with CFQ or another over deadline, but that deadline usually gives the best results for me (especially for JFS); /archives/xfs/2009-12/msg00238.html (10,931 bytes)
4. Re: benchmark results (score: 1): Author: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 12:27:44 +0100; Le Thu, 24 Dec 2009 02:31:10 -0800 (PST) vous écriviez: xfs is slow at file creation/deletion if you mount it with barriers on standard disk drives (not so with hardware RAID controllers). -- -- Emma; /archives/xfs/2009-12/msg00266.html (9,042 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]