Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*bad\s+TSO\s+performance\s+in\s+2\.6\.9\-rc2\-BK\s*$/: 194 ]

Total 194 documents matching your query.

1. Re: bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK (score: 1)
Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 12:23:06 +0200
I increased the receive buffers on the target and the difference between TSO and non TSO is much less now (only 5MB/s instead of 20MB/s) Your theory seems to make some sense. -Andi
/archives/netdev/2004-10/msg00004.html (8,510 bytes)

2. Re: bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK (score: 1)
Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 12:35:54 +0200
Still slower, like previously reported. But I tried tweaking the sysctl now. Result is that 2 is pretty good (only 3MB/s) slower and >20 is also pretty good (2MB/s slower). Everything inbetween is a
/archives/netdev/2004-10/msg00005.html (8,892 bytes)

3. Re: bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK (score: 1)
Author: John Heffner <jheffner@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 21:32:25 -0400 (EDT)
Here's what I've observed now: on one machine I have interface hangs after a non-deterministic amount of time (usually within a few seconds) with TSO on if I'm sending at a reasonably high rate with
/archives/netdev/2004-10/msg00033.html (8,164 bytes)

4. Re: bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK (score: 1)
Author: adi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 13:07:56 -0700
Time to consult the e1000 driver maintainers probably. There are threee folks mentioned in linux/MAINTAINERS as contacts.
/archives/netdev/2004-10/msg00125.html (8,079 bytes)

5. bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK (score: 1)
Author: S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 16:30:13 +1000
ill hel
/archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00826.html (12,426 bytes)

6. Re: bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK (score: 1)
Author: mieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 08:54:18 -0700
s, sing
/archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00836.html (9,099 bytes)

7. Re: bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK (score: 1)
Author: jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 22:30:21 +0200
wicz PLD/
/archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00868.html (8,924 bytes)

8. Re: bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK (score: 1)
Author: eaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 01:55:16 +1000
-yoshfuji
/archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00920.html (9,024 bytes)

9. Re: bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 15:58:35 -0700
cache ove
/archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00942.html (11,136 bytes)

10. Re: bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 16:00:00 +0200
rs, jamal
/archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00988.html (10,421 bytes)

11. Re: bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK (score: 1)
Author: minger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:12:09 -0700
ory if an
/archives/netdev/2004-09/msg01000.html (9,961 bytes)

12. Re: bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK (score: 1)
Author: avid S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 21:55:15 +0200
ev-2.6/dr
/archives/netdev/2004-09/msg01007.html (10,677 bytes)

13. Re: bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK (score: 1)
Author: S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:07:08 -0700
xxxxxxxx>
/archives/netdev/2004-09/msg01010.html (10,938 bytes)

14. Re: bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:12:47 -0700
be bring
/archives/netdev/2004-09/msg01011.html (11,088 bytes)

15. Re: bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK (score: 1)
Author: esse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:28:16 -0700
-- Ueimor
/archives/netdev/2004-09/msg01014.html (9,599 bytes)

16. Re: bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK (score: 1)
Author: xxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:30:11 -0700
our syste
/archives/netdev/2004-09/msg01015.html (11,096 bytes)

17. Re: bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK (score: 1)
Author: n Blake <slblake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:39:06 -0700
roundtrip
/archives/netdev/2004-09/msg01017.html (12,369 bytes)

18. Re: bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK (score: 1)
Author: j@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:56:17 -0700
ind it. T
/archives/netdev/2004-09/msg01018.html (12,044 bytes)

19. Re: bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK (score: 1)
Author: @xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 23:56:57 +0200
ere. --ro
/archives/netdev/2004-09/msg01025.html (10,873 bytes)

20. Re: bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK (score: 1)
Author: ler" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:04:25 -0700
/s. -Andi
/archives/netdev/2004-09/msg01026.html (10,980 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu