Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*af

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*af_packet\s+bug\?\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Re: af_packet bug? (score: 1): Author: Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 02 Nov 2001 09:26:36 +0100; Thank you. Since af_packet is almost the right thing, could the TAP device be used just to inject packets into the host TCP/IP stack? The emulator sends packets to the network with af_packet as usual; /archives/netdev/2001-11/msg00000.html (8,188 bytes)
2. af_packet bug? (score: 1): Author: Lars Brinkhoff <lars@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 29 Oct 2001 19:10:24 +0100; (Is this list alive?) I have an application that sends raw ethernet frames to a network interface using the af_packet module. This works well except when sending a packet intended for the host that; /archives/netdev/2001-10/msg00228.html (7,277 bytes)
3. Re: af_packet bug? (score: 1): Author: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 21:43:46 +0300 (MSK); Neither or them. It is simply the only expected behaviour. Ethernet is simplex media, it does not hear itself and it is impossible to talk to self using it. Well, if you do not believe, try to use s; /archives/netdev/2001-10/msg00229.html (7,862 bytes)
4. Re: af_packet bug? (score: 1): Author: Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 30 Oct 2001 08:39:13 +0100; The application is in fact a computer emulator. Among other things, the emulator emulates a network interface using the af_packet facility. The emulator can run an operating system with a TCP/IP stac; /archives/netdev/2001-10/msg00234.html (8,974 bytes)
5. Re: af_packet bug? (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 16:44:11 +0100; The tun and/or ethertap devices have been exactly designed to make such things possible. -Andi; /archives/netdev/2001-10/msg00235.html (7,961 bytes)
6. Re: af_packet bug? (score: 1): Author: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 20:52:08 +0300 (MSK); No. It looks like you use packet socket for a purpose where it cannot be useful at all. This cannot work. I guess you want ethertap. Alexey; /archives/netdev/2001-10/msg00236.html (7,225 bytes)
7. Re: af_packet bug? (score: 1): Author: Michael Richardson <mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 20:35:53 -0500; Lars> The application is in fact a computer emulator. Among other Lars> things, the emulator emulates a network interface using the Lars> af_packet facility. The emulator can run an operating system; /archives/netdev/2001-10/msg00237.html (8,129 bytes)
8. Re: af_packet bug? (score: 1): Author: Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 02 Nov 2001 09:26:36 +0100; Thank you. Since af_packet is almost the right thing, could the TAP device be used just to inject packets into the host TCP/IP stack? The emulator sends packets to the network with af_packet as usual; /archives/netdev/2001-11/msg00093.html (8,439 bytes)
9. af_packet bug? (score: 1): Author: Lars Brinkhoff <lars@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 29 Oct 2001 19:10:24 +0100; Hello, (Is this list alive?) I have an application that sends raw ethernet frames to a network interface using the af_packet module. This works well except when sending a packet intended for the host; /archives/netdev/2001-10/msg00466.html (7,277 bytes)
10. Re: af_packet bug? (score: 1): Author: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 21:43:46 +0300 (MSK); Hello! Neither or them. It is simply the only expected behaviour. Ethernet is simplex media, it does not hear itself and it is impossible to talk to self using it. Well, if you do not believe, try to; /archives/netdev/2001-10/msg00467.html (7,884 bytes)
11. Re: af_packet bug? (score: 1): Author: Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 30 Oct 2001 08:39:13 +0100; The application is in fact a computer emulator. Among other things, the emulator emulates a network interface using the af_packet facility. The emulator can run an operating system with a TCP/IP stac; /archives/netdev/2001-10/msg00472.html (9,062 bytes)
12. Re: af_packet bug? (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 16:44:11 +0100; The tun and/or ethertap devices have been exactly designed to make such things possible. -Andi; /archives/netdev/2001-10/msg00473.html (8,079 bytes)
13. Re: af_packet bug? (score: 1): Author: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 20:52:08 +0300 (MSK); Hello! No. It looks like you use packet socket for a purpose where it cannot be useful at all. This cannot work. I guess you want ethertap. Alexey; /archives/netdev/2001-10/msg00474.html (7,247 bytes)
14. Re: af_packet bug? (score: 1): Author: Michael Richardson <mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 20:35:53 -0500; Lars> The application is in fact a computer emulator. Among other Lars> things, the emulator emulates a network interface using the Lars> af_packet facility. The emulator can run an operating system; /archives/netdev/2001-10/msg00475.html (8,165 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]