Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+volume\s+labels\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+volume\s+labels\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. XFS volume labels (score: 1): Author: Ed McKenzie <eem12@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 14:25:17 -0400; Hello all, I can set XFS volume labels using xfs_admin, but it seems the kernel can't mount-by-label (which is how RH7 does things.) Is this a TODO item? If I do a clean install on another machine us; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg00084.html (7,940 bytes)
2. Re: XFS volume labels (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2001 13:32:09 -0500; Mount by label is all user space, there is no kernel code involved, beyond reading data out the block device interface to look for the magic numbers. You need a version of the mount command with thi; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg00086.html (8,968 bytes)
3. Re: XFS volume labels (score: 1): Author: Ed McKenzie <eem12@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 14:45:25 -0400; Ah. There was talk on lkml about allowing the kernel to find the root fs by UUID or label, so I assumed all of this was done in the kernel. 2.10r-4 from Wolverine here. Looking at the source, it appe; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg00087.html (9,301 bytes)
4. Re: XFS volume labels (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2001 13:56:40 -0500; It is possible our labeling code got broken, have you tried the uuid version of the mount? You can also use xfs_db directly to dump this stuff out: xfs_db -r /dev/xxxx sb 0 print Steve; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg00089.html (9,529 bytes)
5. Re: XFS volume labels (score: 1): Author: Ed McKenzie <eem12@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 18:33:37 -0400; [...] No such luck. The code in mount_by_label.c seems pretty straightforward, though; when I have more time I'll do some debugging. -ed; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg00099.html (9,202 bytes)
6. Re: XFS volume labels (score: 1): Author: "Nathan Scott" <nathans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 09:10:51 -0500; fwiw, I use mount-by-label on several XFS filesystems on my development machine with no problems (have done so for several months now). This was first in util-linux 2.10r, so sounds like you do inde; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg00103.html (10,518 bytes)
7. XFS volume labels (score: 1): Author: x>; Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 14:25:17 -0400; Hello all, I can set XFS volume labels using xfs_admin, but it seems the kernel can't mount-by-label (which is how RH7 does things.) Is this a TODO item? If I do a clean install on another machine us; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg00766.html (7,940 bytes)
8. Re: XFS volume labels (score: 1): Author: x>; Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2001 13:32:09 -0500; Mount by label is all user space, there is no kernel code involved, beyond reading data out the block device interface to look for the magic numbers. You need a version of the mount command with thi; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg00768.html (8,968 bytes)
9. Re: XFS volume labels (score: 1): Author: x>; Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 14:45:25 -0400; Ah. There was talk on lkml about allowing the kernel to find the root fs by UUID or label, so I assumed all of this was done in the kernel. 2.10r-4 from Wolverine here. Looking at the source, it appe; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg00769.html (9,301 bytes)
10. Re: XFS volume labels (score: 1): Author: x>; Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2001 13:56:40 -0500; It is possible our labeling code got broken, have you tried the uuid version of the mount? You can also use xfs_db directly to dump this stuff out: xfs_db -r /dev/xxxx sb 0 print Steve; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg00771.html (9,529 bytes)
11. Re: XFS volume labels (score: 1): Author: x>; Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 18:33:37 -0400; [...] No such luck. The code in mount_by_label.c seems pretty straightforward, though; when I have more time I'll do some debugging. -ed; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg00781.html (9,202 bytes)
12. Re: XFS volume labels (score: 1): Author: x>; Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 09:10:51 -0500; fwiw, I use mount-by-label on several XFS filesystems on my development machine with no problems (have done so for several months now). This was first in util-linux 2.10r, so sounds like you do inde; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg00785.html (10,518 bytes)
13. XFS volume labels (score: 1): Author: Ed McKenzie <eem12@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 14:25:17 -0400; Hello all, I can set XFS volume labels using xfs_admin, but it seems the kernel can't mount-by-label (which is how RH7 does things.) Is this a TODO item? If I do a clean install on another machine us; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg01448.html (7,940 bytes)
14. Re: XFS volume labels (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2001 13:32:09 -0500; Mount by label is all user space, there is no kernel code involved, beyond reading data out the block device interface to look for the magic numbers. You need a version of the mount command with thi; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg01450.html (9,036 bytes)
15. Re: XFS volume labels (score: 1): Author: Ed McKenzie <eem12@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 14:45:25 -0400; Ah. There was talk on lkml about allowing the kernel to find the root fs by UUID or label, so I assumed all of this was done in the kernel. 2.10r-4 from Wolverine here. Looking at the source, it appe; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg01451.html (9,448 bytes)
16. Re: XFS volume labels (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2001 13:56:40 -0500; It is possible our labeling code got broken, have you tried the uuid version of the mount? You can also use xfs_db directly to dump this stuff out: xfs_db -r /dev/xxxx sb 0 print Steve; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg01453.html (9,597 bytes)
17. Re: XFS volume labels (score: 1): Author: Ed McKenzie <eem12@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 18:33:37 -0400; [...] No such luck. The code in mount_by_label.c seems pretty straightforward, though; when I have more time I'll do some debugging. -ed; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg01463.html (9,349 bytes)
18. Re: XFS volume labels (score: 1): Author: "Nathan Scott" <nathans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 09:10:51 -0500; hi, fwiw, I use mount-by-label on several XFS filesystems on my development machine with no problems (have done so for several months now). This was first in util-linux 2.10r, so sounds like you do i; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg01467.html (10,661 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]