Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+use\s+in\s+production\s+environment\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+use\s+in\s+production\s+environment\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Re: XFS use in production environment (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2001 08:31:56 -0600; Hi Derek - Please don't send HTML mail to the list, our overzealous filters bounce it. :( But welcome to the list, and hopefully someone can answer your questions below... -Eric -- Eric Sandeen XFS f; /archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00020.html (9,233 bytes)
2. Re: XFS use in production environment (score: 1): Author: Derek Richardson <derek.richardson@xxxxxxx>; Date: 02 Nov 2001 09:11:09 -0600; My apologies, I'm used to our version/settings of Mailman, which don't mind HTMl. Also, I spoke w/ my employer, and I should be fine to do a bit of stability testing/benchmarking on a machine I have; /archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00022.html (10,489 bytes)
3. Re: XFS use in production environment (score: 1): Author: Martin Spott <Martin.Spott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 12:40:08 +0100 (MET); Sorry, I don't know of any statistics. But I might approve that i'm running 2.4.4-XFS on a customers 'PPS' ("Production Planning System", as we call it in Germany). This means the customer _really_ d; /archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00029.html (9,052 bytes)
4. Re: XFS use in production environment (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 19:06:46 +0100 (CET); You could also use the newer 2.4.9 redhat errata kernels that you can find in the testing directory on the FTP site which works very well on the database server at work. Cheers Seth; /archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00031.html (9,276 bytes)
5. Re: XFS use in production environment (score: 1): Author: Anuradha Ratnaweera <anuradha@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 09:46:00 +0600; I have 3 machines running XFS + latest stable linux 2.4 kernel running on serious production environments without problems. Anuradha -- Debian GNU/Linux (kernel 2.4.13) Living your life is a task so; /archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00061.html (8,584 bytes)
6. RE: XFS use in production environment (score: 1): Author: "Gonyou, Austin" <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2001 21:53:03 -0600; I've got got several databases on this running for our pre-production and our development environments. Not to mention we use XFS on our webservers as well. Works well for us so far. -- Austin Gonyou; /archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00062.html (8,661 bytes)
7. Re: XFS use in production environment (score: 1): Author: Derek Richardson <derek.richardson@xxxxxxx>; Date: 05 Nov 2001 09:36:42 -0600; Thanks for the info, I appreciate it. I wasn't really all that worried about using XFS, I've done a bit of stability testing myself, proved fine. But we're going to stick w/ one of the RedHat distro; /archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00080.html (10,336 bytes)
8. Re: XFS use in production environment (score: 1): Author: Derek Richardson <derek.richardson@xxxxxxx>; Date: 05 Nov 2001 17:56:41 -0600; Thanks for the info. Regards, Derek R. -- Junior Linux Geek 713-817-1197 (cell) 713-781-4000 x2267 (office) "Linux users, fanatical. No way... HEY! Get that MCSE up on the altar, Tux must be appease; /archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00114.html (9,005 bytes)
9. ng RPMs (score: 1): Author: x>; Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2001 08:31:56 -0600; ?; /archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00753.html (9,233 bytes)
10. ng RPMs (score: 1): Author: x>; Date: 02 Nov 2001 09:11:09 -0600; a; /archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00755.html (10,489 bytes)
11. ompiler (score: 1): Author: x>; Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 12:40:08 +0100 (MET); m; /archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00762.html (9,052 bytes)
12. 1_beta2 (score: 1): Author: x>; Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 19:06:46 +0100 (CET); g; /archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00764.html (9,276 bytes)
13. ILO ... (score: 1): Author: x>; Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 09:46:00 +0600; n; /archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00794.html (8,584 bytes)
14. ronment (score: 1): Author: x>; Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2001 21:53:03 -0600; o; /archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00795.html (8,661 bytes)
15. 5 drive (score: 1): Author: x>; Date: 05 Nov 2001 09:36:42 -0600; d; /archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00813.html (10,336 bytes)
16. to SMP (score: 1): Author: x>; Date: 05 Nov 2001 17:56:41 -0600; i; /archives/xfs/2001-11/msg00847.html (9,005 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]