Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+setting\s+custom\s+extent\s+size\:\s+real\-time\s+section\s+only\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+setting\s+custom\s+extent\s+size\:\s+real\-time\s+section\s+only\?\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. XFS setting custom extent size: real-time section only? (score: 1): Author: Heilige Gheist <hgheist@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 04:09:18 -0700 (PDT); I'm trying to get custom extent size per file working, but XFS_IOC_FSSETXATTR ioctl returns with EINVAL, both from my code or from xfs_io. The environment is SLES9 SP2, 2.6.5-7.252 kernel, xfsprogs-2; /archives/xfs/2006-07/msg00276.html (8,889 bytes)
2. Re: XFS setting custom extent size: real-time section only? (score: 1): Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:00:30 +1000; Indeed it has. I'm not sure which kernel version this was merged into, but the rough timeframe can be seen on http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/ on the "recent changes" table. It wont be there in any S; /archives/xfs/2006-07/msg00282.html (9,573 bytes)
3. Re: XFS setting custom extent size: real-time section only? (score: 1): Author: Heilige Gheist <hgheist@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 04:03:38 -0700 (PDT); I've checked source code of 2.6.16.13-4 in SUSE 10.1, it looks like this limitation is no longer there. However the lack of support for this in SLES9 complicates things a bit, for example we're using; /archives/xfs/2006-07/msg00290.html (10,907 bytes)
4. Re: XFS setting custom extent size: real-time section only? (score: 1): Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 08:43:56 +1000; OK. Are you certain you need this feature? (can you describe your usage a bit?) You can get large contiguous chunks of disk space via large direct writes for example, or preallocation, so maybe you c; /archives/xfs/2006-07/msg00297.html (10,057 bytes)
5. Re: XFS setting custom extent size: real-time section only? (score: 1): Author: Heilige Gheist <hgheist@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 11:08:07 -0700 (PDT); The application is reading and writing sparse file of 0.5-1GB, with heavy skew toward read. The data is written in clusters of various size, depending on data stream type. The filesystem is constant; /archives/xfs/2006-07/msg00311.html (9,882 bytes)
6. Re: XFS setting custom extent size: real-time section only? (score: 1): Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:00:51 +1000; Hmm. Yes, thats the one. No, but it does the best it can under the circumstances, which is usually pretty good. But its not really "extra" if you know you're going to use it, right? Its a different c; /archives/xfs/2006-07/msg00315.html (10,564 bytes)
7. Re: XFS setting custom extent size: real-time section only? (score: 1): Author: Heilige Gheist <hgheist@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 05:38:37 -0700 (PDT); I think that I'll go for the custom extent size as the harder guarantee against fragmentation. It also looks to me that custom extent is easier for application to implement. Are there any other reas; /archives/xfs/2006-07/msg00382.html (10,441 bytes)
8. Re: XFS setting custom extent size: real-time section only? (score: 1): Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 08:29:54 +1000; Not really... only things like "its not there in old kernels", and "its not seen the level of testing and exposure of other XFS features, like preallocation", etc. Oh, I see. You don't need to estima; /archives/xfs/2006-07/msg00387.html (10,536 bytes)
9. XFS setting custom extent size: real-time section only? (score: 1): Author: Heilige Gheist <hgheist@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 04:09:18 -0700 (PDT); I'm trying to get custom extent size per file working, but XFS_IOC_FSSETXATTR ioctl returns with EINVAL, both from my code or from xfs_io. The environment is SLES9 SP2, 2.6.5-7.252 kernel, xfsprogs-2; /archives/xfs/2006-07/msg00666.html (8,889 bytes)
10. Re: XFS setting custom extent size: real-time section only? (score: 1): Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:00:30 +1000; Indeed it has. I'm not sure which kernel version this was merged into, but the rough timeframe can be seen on http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/ on the "recent changes" table. It wont be there in any S; /archives/xfs/2006-07/msg00672.html (9,573 bytes)
11. Re: XFS setting custom extent size: real-time section only? (score: 1): Author: Heilige Gheist <hgheist@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 04:03:38 -0700 (PDT); I've checked source code of 2.6.16.13-4 in SUSE 10.1, it looks like this limitation is no longer there. However the lack of support for this in SLES9 complicates things a bit, for example we're using; /archives/xfs/2006-07/msg00680.html (10,907 bytes)
12. Re: XFS setting custom extent size: real-time section only? (score: 1): Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 08:43:56 +1000; OK. Are you certain you need this feature? (can you describe your usage a bit?) You can get large contiguous chunks of disk space via large direct writes for example, or preallocation, so maybe you c; /archives/xfs/2006-07/msg00687.html (10,057 bytes)
13. Re: XFS setting custom extent size: real-time section only? (score: 1): Author: Heilige Gheist <hgheist@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 11:08:07 -0700 (PDT); The application is reading and writing sparse file of 0.5-1GB, with heavy skew toward read. The data is written in clusters of various size, depending on data stream type. The filesystem is constant; /archives/xfs/2006-07/msg00701.html (9,882 bytes)
14. Re: XFS setting custom extent size: real-time section only? (score: 1): Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:00:51 +1000; Hmm. Yes, thats the one. No, but it does the best it can under the circumstances, which is usually pretty good. But its not really "extra" if you know you're going to use it, right? Its a different c; /archives/xfs/2006-07/msg00705.html (10,564 bytes)
15. Re: XFS setting custom extent size: real-time section only? (score: 1): Author: Heilige Gheist <hgheist@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 05:38:37 -0700 (PDT); I think that I'll go for the custom extent size as the harder guarantee against fragmentation. It also looks to me that custom extent is easier for application to implement. Are there any other reas; /archives/xfs/2006-07/msg00772.html (10,441 bytes)
16. Re: XFS setting custom extent size: real-time section only? (score: 1): Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 08:29:54 +1000; Not really... only things like "its not there in old kernels", and "its not seen the level of testing and exposure of other XFS features, like preallocation", etc. Oh, I see. You don't need to estima; /archives/xfs/2006-07/msg00777.html (10,536 bytes)
17. XFS setting custom extent size: real-time section only? (score: 1): Author: Heilige Gheist <hgheist@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 04:09:18 -0700 (PDT); I'm trying to get custom extent size per file working, but XFS_IOC_FSSETXATTR ioctl returns with EINVAL, both from my code or from xfs_io. The environment is SLES9 SP2, 2.6.5-7.252 kernel, xfsprogs-2; /archives/xfs/2006-07/msg01056.html (8,904 bytes)
18. Re: XFS setting custom extent size: real-time section only? (score: 1): Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:00:30 +1000; Indeed it has. I'm not sure which kernel version this was merged into, but the rough timeframe can be seen on http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/ on the "recent changes" table. It wont be there in any S; /archives/xfs/2006-07/msg01062.html (9,699 bytes)
19. Re: XFS setting custom extent size: real-time section only? (score: 1): Author: Heilige Gheist <hgheist@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 04:03:38 -0700 (PDT); I've checked source code of 2.6.16.13-4 in SUSE 10.1, it looks like this limitation is no longer there. However the lack of support for this in SLES9 complicates things a bit, for example we're using; /archives/xfs/2006-07/msg01070.html (10,968 bytes)
20. Re: XFS setting custom extent size: real-time section only? (score: 1): Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 08:43:56 +1000; OK. Are you certain you need this feature? (can you describe your usage a bit?) You can get large contiguous chunks of disk space via large direct writes for example, or preallocation, so maybe you c; /archives/xfs/2006-07/msg01077.html (10,199 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]