Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+prerelease\s+0\.10\s+test2\s+images\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+prerelease\s+0\.10\s+test2\s+images\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. XFS prerelease 0.10 test2 images (score: 1): Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 00:21:38 -0600 (CST); Just a quick note: The rpms have been regenerated to the latest state of the XFS tree. This was primarily to pick up the lvm 0.9beta6 stuff, be a few bugs have also been squashed in the last few days; /archives/xfs/2001-03/msg00337.html (8,544 bytes)
2. Re: XFS prerelease 0.10 test2 images (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 18:43:46 -0600; I have regenerated the ISO & uploaded it to: ftp://linux-xfs.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/PreRelease-0.10-test2/iso/ and ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/PreRelease-0.10-test2/iso/ The instal; /archives/xfs/2001-03/msg00343.html (9,298 bytes)
3. Re: XFS prerelease 0.10 test2 images (score: 1): Author: Chris Croswhite <ccroswhite@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 23:00:26 -0800; I have tried the iso image. However, everytime time I place in disc one of RH7.0, the installer indicates that the wrong disc is installed. I have inserted disc 2 of RH7.0 also to no avail. Am I miss; /archives/xfs/2001-03/msg00346.html (10,648 bytes)
4. Re: XFS prerelease 0.10 test2 images (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 08:33:45 -0600; Did you burn your Disc 1 and Disc 2 from the _Wolverine_ beta isos? They should both have a file like .disc1-i386 or .disc2-i386 in the top level of the CD, and that file should contain the text: 982; /archives/xfs/2001-03/msg00349.html (9,368 bytes)
5. Re: XFS prerelease 0.10 test2 images (score: 1): Author: Russel Ingram <ringram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 10:17:59 -0700 (MST); Has anyone set up an ftp server to do ftp/http/nfs installs from yet. Russell maybe? Russ -- -- "Bill Gates and Microsoft have ruined the computer industry for a long time to come by creating a class; /archives/xfs/2001-03/msg00350.html (9,197 bytes)
6. Re: XFS prerelease 0.10 test2 images (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 11:25:47 -0600; Russell has the older PreRelease 0.9 / Red Hat 7.0 install on ftp.thebarn.com/SGI, but it doesn't look like he's updated it to PR0.10/RH7.1-beta yet. -Eric; /archives/xfs/2001-03/msg00352.html (8,865 bytes)
7. Re: XFS prerelease 0.10 test2 images (score: 1): Author: Bryan-TheBS-Smith <thebs@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 13:36:41 -0500; ??? I just did a couple at home on my private network. I didn't know SGI was offering this capability over the Internet? BTW, it worked great over NFS. -- TheBS -- Bryan "TheBS" Smith chat:thebs413 @; /archives/xfs/2001-03/msg00354.html (9,576 bytes)
8. Re: XFS prerelease 0.10 test2 images (score: 1): Author: Russel Ingram <ringram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 03:06:11 -0700 (MST); I think SGI is not. Russell Cattelan was kind enough with 0.9 to set this up on one of his servers at umn and leave it open for those of us that wanted to use it. AFAIK, its a private thing and is pr; /archives/xfs/2001-03/msg00358.html (9,837 bytes)
9. Re: XFS prerelease 0.10 test2 images (score: 1): Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 23:09:23 -0600; The reason SGI doesn't have a full redhat mirror is due to cryto code in the redhat distribution. I'll look into setting up a full mirror at thebarn sometime this week.; /archives/xfs/2001-03/msg00396.html (10,075 bytes)
10. XFS prerelease 0.10 test2 images (score: 1): Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 00:21:38 -0600 (CST); Just a quick note: The rpms have been regenerated to the latest state of the XFS tree. This was primarily to pick up the lvm 0.9beta6 stuff, be a few bugs have also been squashed in the last few days; /archives/xfs/2001-03/msg00870.html (8,544 bytes)
11. Re: XFS prerelease 0.10 test2 images (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 18:43:46 -0600; I have regenerated the ISO & uploaded it to: ftp://linux-xfs.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/PreRelease-0.10-test2/iso/ and ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/PreRelease-0.10-test2/iso/ The instal; /archives/xfs/2001-03/msg00876.html (9,298 bytes)
12. Re: XFS prerelease 0.10 test2 images (score: 1): Author: Chris Croswhite <ccroswhite@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 23:00:26 -0800; I have tried the iso image. However, everytime time I place in disc one of RH7.0, the installer indicates that the wrong disc is installed. I have inserted disc 2 of RH7.0 also to no avail. Am I miss; /archives/xfs/2001-03/msg00879.html (10,648 bytes)
13. Re: XFS prerelease 0.10 test2 images (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 08:33:45 -0600; Did you burn your Disc 1 and Disc 2 from the _Wolverine_ beta isos? They should both have a file like .disc1-i386 or .disc2-i386 in the top level of the CD, and that file should contain the text: 982; /archives/xfs/2001-03/msg00882.html (9,368 bytes)
14. Re: XFS prerelease 0.10 test2 images (score: 1): Author: Russel Ingram <ringram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 10:17:59 -0700 (MST); Has anyone set up an ftp server to do ftp/http/nfs installs from yet. Russell maybe? Russ -- -- "Bill Gates and Microsoft have ruined the computer industry for a long time to come by creating a class; /archives/xfs/2001-03/msg00883.html (9,197 bytes)
15. Re: XFS prerelease 0.10 test2 images (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 11:25:47 -0600; Russell has the older PreRelease 0.9 / Red Hat 7.0 install on ftp.thebarn.com/SGI, but it doesn't look like he's updated it to PR0.10/RH7.1-beta yet. -Eric; /archives/xfs/2001-03/msg00885.html (8,865 bytes)
16. Re: XFS prerelease 0.10 test2 images (score: 1): Author: Bryan-TheBS-Smith <thebs@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 13:36:41 -0500; ??? I just did a couple at home on my private network. I didn't know SGI was offering this capability over the Internet? BTW, it worked great over NFS. -- TheBS -- Bryan "TheBS" Smith chat:thebs413 @; /archives/xfs/2001-03/msg00887.html (9,576 bytes)
17. Re: XFS prerelease 0.10 test2 images (score: 1): Author: Russel Ingram <ringram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 03:06:11 -0700 (MST); I think SGI is not. Russell Cattelan was kind enough with 0.9 to set this up on one of his servers at umn and leave it open for those of us that wanted to use it. AFAIK, its a private thing and is pr; /archives/xfs/2001-03/msg00891.html (9,837 bytes)
18. Re: XFS prerelease 0.10 test2 images (score: 1): Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 23:09:23 -0600; The reason SGI doesn't have a full redhat mirror is due to cryto code in the redhat distribution. I'll look into setting up a full mirror at thebarn sometime this week.; /archives/xfs/2001-03/msg00929.html (10,075 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]