Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+on\s+recent\s+\-ac\s+kernels\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+on\s+recent\s+\-ac\s+kernels\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. XFS on recent -ac kernels (score: 1): Author: Dirk Steinberg <dws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 20:39:11 +0200; is there any version of XFS that patches into recent versions of the -ac series kernels, such as 2.4.5-ac17? The problem with the CVS tree is that it contains a lot of other stuff besides the actual; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00854.html (7,623 bytes)
2. Re: XFS on recent -ac kernels (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 13:45:10 -0500; For starters, you can get the kdb patch for any of Linus' kernels from oss.sgi.com/projects/kdb, to back that out of XFS CVS (possibly with a conflict or two). Alternatively, look in the testing/Rele; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00856.html (8,510 bytes)
3. Re: XFS on recent -ac kernels (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 22:20:16 +0200 (CEST); The testing release is based on a -ac series kernel and took a lot of time to patch. Normally only patches against linus kernels are made. Cheers Seth; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00858.html (7,688 bytes)
4. Re: XFS on recent -ac kernels (score: 1): Author: Dirk Steinberg <dws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 10:56:15 +0200; What has changed in CVS since then? Is there any CVS tag from the time the Release-1.0.1 snapshot was made? - Dirk; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00864.html (8,839 bytes)
5. Re: XFS on recent -ac kernels (score: 1): Author: Dirk Steinberg <dws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 10:59:43 +0200; Which testing release are you referring to? The one in ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/testing/RHrawhide/ ? I'll try to patch that from -ac4 to -ac17 and see what happens... Cheers Dirk; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00865.html (8,066 bytes)
6. Re: XFS on recent -ac kernels (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 12:50:52 +0200 (CEST); The RedHat rawhide kernel is -ac based an Russel needed 3 hours(!) to patch XFS with this kernel. Cheers Seth; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00868.html (8,374 bytes)
7. Re: XFS on recent -ac kernels (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 13:11:46 +0200 (CEST); They take a current kernel release (2.4.5) and stabilize that by backporting fixes that are inserted in CVS. Currently the CVS tree is tracking the linus -pre versions and releases. Cheers Seth; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00871.html (8,405 bytes)
8. XFS on recent -ac kernels (score: 1): Author: Dirk Steinberg <dws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 20:39:11 +0200; is there any version of XFS that patches into recent versions of the -ac series kernels, such as 2.4.5-ac17? The problem with the CVS tree is that it contains a lot of other stuff besides the actual; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg02024.html (7,623 bytes)
9. Re: XFS on recent -ac kernels (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 13:45:10 -0500; For starters, you can get the kdb patch for any of Linus' kernels from oss.sgi.com/projects/kdb, to back that out of XFS CVS (possibly with a conflict or two). Alternatively, look in the testing/Rele; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg02026.html (8,510 bytes)
10. Re: XFS on recent -ac kernels (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 22:20:16 +0200 (CEST); The testing release is based on a -ac series kernel and took a lot of time to patch. Normally only patches against linus kernels are made. Cheers Seth; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg02028.html (7,688 bytes)
11. Re: XFS on recent -ac kernels (score: 1): Author: Dirk Steinberg <dws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 10:56:15 +0200; What has changed in CVS since then? Is there any CVS tag from the time the Release-1.0.1 snapshot was made? - Dirk; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg02034.html (8,839 bytes)
12. Re: XFS on recent -ac kernels (score: 1): Author: Dirk Steinberg <dws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 10:59:43 +0200; Which testing release are you referring to? The one in ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/testing/RHrawhide/ ? I'll try to patch that from -ac4 to -ac17 and see what happens... Cheers Dirk; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg02035.html (8,066 bytes)
13. Re: XFS on recent -ac kernels (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 12:50:52 +0200 (CEST); The RedHat rawhide kernel is -ac based an Russel needed 3 hours(!) to patch XFS with this kernel. Cheers Seth; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg02038.html (8,374 bytes)
14. Re: XFS on recent -ac kernels (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 13:11:46 +0200 (CEST); They take a current kernel release (2.4.5) and stabilize that by backporting fixes that are inserted in CVS. Currently the CVS tree is tracking the linus -pre versions and releases. Cheers Seth; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg02041.html (8,405 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]