Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+on\s+LVM\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+on\s+LVM\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. XFS on LVM (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2001 23:11:06 -0700; I'm trying to get XFS working on LVM. I'm almost there, but I'm hitting a problem (or two). Here's the set up A newly installed Redhat 7.1 system A fresh (today) XFS kernel tree from CVS A fresh cop; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg00487.html (7,750 bytes)
2. Re: XFS on LVM (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 10:44:26 GMT+1; I'm trying to get XFS working on LVM. I'm almost >there, but I'm hitting If I take the machine down to single user mode, and fdisk it to create a single large partition on a disk. I can create the p; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg00488.html (8,467 bytes)
3. Re: XFS on LVM (score: 1): Author: >; Date: 22 Apr 2001 08:48:09 -0400; I assume you merged up the kernel to beta7? If you blindly apply the patch generated by the LVM makefile system, you'll end up backing out the XFS-specific changes to the volume manager. In this cas; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg00489.html (8,632 bytes)
4. Re: XFS on LVM (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 21:29:57 -0700; I re-did the whole thing, minus the LVM patch, and it's working great now. thanks to all who answered. Ric PS: You guys may want to change the documentation that's on your web site. In the FAQ, it a; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg00505.html (7,935 bytes)
5. Re: XFS on LVM (score: 1): Author: >; Date: 23 Apr 2001 07:09:15 -0400; The LVM and RAID sections of the FAQ are quite out of sync with our current bits, I'm afraid. Thomas, are you out there? -- Martin K. Petersen, Principal Linux Consultant, Linuxcare, Inc. mkp@xxxxxx; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg00510.html (8,639 bytes)
6. Re: XFS on LVM (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 19:12:35 +0200; yes i am - i'll try to fix it but i can't guarantie it - because i'll leave for a short journey to zuerich in under two hours ... but i can guarantie that i will fix it at the weekend if it won't be; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg00518.html (9,289 bytes)
7. Re: XFS on LVM (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 20:46:50 +0200; ok - found some time - checked in an updated version right now will do a complete rework of the FAQ most probably over the next weekend ... have to leave now and will be offline until the weekend ...; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg00521.html (9,243 bytes)
8. XFS on LVM (score: 1): Author: xxx>; Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2001 23:11:06 -0700; I'm trying to get XFS working on LVM. I'm almost there, but I'm hitting a problem (or two). Here's the set up A newly installed Redhat 7.1 system A fresh (today) XFS kernel tree from CVS A fresh cop; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg01169.html (7,750 bytes)
9. Re: XFS on LVM (score: 1): Author: xxx>; Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 10:44:26 GMT+1; I'm trying to get XFS working on LVM. I'm almost >there, but I'm hitting If I take the machine down to single user mode, and fdisk it to create a single large partition on a disk. I can create the p; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg01170.html (8,467 bytes)
10. Re: XFS on LVM (score: 1): Author: xxx>; Date: 22 Apr 2001 08:48:09 -0400; I assume you merged up the kernel to beta7? If you blindly apply the patch generated by the LVM makefile system, you'll end up backing out the XFS-specific changes to the volume manager. In this cas; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg01171.html (8,632 bytes)
11. Re: XFS on LVM (score: 1): Author: xxx>; Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 21:29:57 -0700; I re-did the whole thing, minus the LVM patch, and it's working great now. thanks to all who answered. Ric PS: You guys may want to change the documentation that's on your web site. In the FAQ, it a; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg01187.html (7,935 bytes)
12. Re: XFS on LVM (score: 1): Author: xxx>; Date: 23 Apr 2001 07:09:15 -0400; The LVM and RAID sections of the FAQ are quite out of sync with our current bits, I'm afraid. Thomas, are you out there? -- Martin K. Petersen, Principal Linux Consultant, Linuxcare, Inc. mkp@xxxxxx; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg01192.html (8,639 bytes)
13. Re: XFS on LVM (score: 1): Author: xxx>; Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 19:12:35 +0200; yes i am - i'll try to fix it but i can't guarantie it - because i'll leave for a short journey to zuerich in under two hours ... but i can guarantie that i will fix it at the weekend if it won't be; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg01200.html (9,289 bytes)
14. Re: XFS on LVM (score: 1): Author: xxx>; Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 20:46:50 +0200; ok - found some time - checked in an updated version right now will do a complete rework of the FAQ most probably over the next weekend ... have to leave now and will be offline until the weekend ...; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg01203.html (9,243 bytes)
15. XFS on LVM (score: 1): Author: Ric Tibbetts <ric@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2001 23:11:06 -0700; Help! I'm trying to get XFS working on LVM. I'm almost there, but I'm hitting a problem (or two). Here's the set up A newly installed Redhat 7.1 system A fresh (today) XFS kernel tree from CVS A fres; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg01851.html (7,750 bytes)
16. Re: XFS on LVM (score: 1): Author: LENHOF Jean-Yves <lenh_jea@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 03:44:08 -0600; I'm trying to get XFS working on LVM. I'm almost >there, but I'm hitting If I take the machine down to single user mode, and fdisk it to create a single large partition on a disk. I can create the p; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg01852.html (8,482 bytes)
17. Re: XFS on LVM (score: 1): Author: "Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 22 Apr 2001 08:48:09 -0400; I assume you merged up the kernel to beta7? If you blindly apply the patch generated by the LVM makefile system, you'll end up backing out the XFS-specific changes to the volume manager. In this cas; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg01853.html (8,710 bytes)
18. Re: XFS on LVM (score: 1): Author: Ric Tibbetts <ric@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 21:29:57 -0700; Sucess! I re-did the whole thing, minus the LVM patch, and it's working great now. thanks to all who answered. Ric PS: You guys may want to change the documentation that's on your web site. In the FA; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg01869.html (7,982 bytes)
19. Re: XFS on LVM (score: 1): Author: "Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 23 Apr 2001 07:09:15 -0400; The LVM and RAID sections of the FAQ are quite out of sync with our current bits, I'm afraid. Thomas, are you out there? -- Martin K. Petersen, Principal Linux Consultant, Linuxcare, Inc. mkp@xxxxxx; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg01874.html (8,766 bytes)
20. Re: XFS on LVM (score: 1): Author: thomas graichen <list-linux.sgi.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 19:12:35 +0200; yes i am - i'll try to fix it but i can't guarantie it - because i'll leave for a short journey to zuerich in under two hours ... but i can guarantie that i will fix it at the weekend if it won't be; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg01882.html (9,384 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]