Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+on\s+2\.4\s+Tib\s+raid\s*$/: 39 ]

Total 39 documents matching your query.

1. XFS on 2.4 Tib raid (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 22:10:25 +0200
I am using an ATTO scsi card speaking to an Infortrend 2.4 Tib raid system. Some system config settings: Distro: debian sarge Kernel: 2.6.11 (kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686) XFS: xfsprogs (2.6.28-1) I cr
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00030.html (8,848 bytes)

2. Re: XFS on 2.4 Tib raid (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 09:10:55 +1000
What sort of data was being copied? What's the actual error? This is the stack trace that's part of the error message, but does not inidcate what the error was. Can you include the error messages tha
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00036.html (10,119 bytes)

3. Re: XFS on 2.4 Tib raid (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 16:21:26 -0700
Does the combination of kernel, drivers and raid cards work reliably for volumes that large without wrapping? Some do not and when you write towards the end of large volumes you end up stomping on da
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00038.html (8,513 bytes)

4. Re: XFS on 2.4 Tib raid (score: 1)
Author: xxxxx
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 10:03:51 +0200
Hi Dave I am copying jpeg files 1-2mb in size. I include the full error from /var/log/messages. As one copies files it stops at some point and the following error loops and the machine needs to be re
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00040.html (12,058 bytes)

5. Re: XFS on 2.4 Tib raid (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 08:44:50 +1000
So you haven't created a partition table on the device at all? So we're trying to allocate an extent and the AGF read from disk is full of zeros. Can you do the following: - write a known pattern to
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00046.html (10,936 bytes)

6. Re: XFS on 2.4 Tib raid (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 07:27:34 +0200
Hi Dave No, however the device mounted 100% The reason we did not originally create a partition is that the fdisk utils could not address the 2.4 Tib device. It returned a size of 200Mb or something
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00047.html (12,246 bytes)

7. Re: XFS on 2.4 Tib raid (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 02:29:01 -0400
it's a limitation of the partition table format. use parted to create a EFI aka ia64 aka GPT partition table. eg. parted /dev/sda (parted) mklabel gpt (parted) mkpart primary 0 2384080 ... (parted) q
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00048.html (9,496 bytes)

8. Re: XFS on 2.4 Tib raid (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 13:57:12 +0200
Hi Dave I did the following: May 11 13:37:40 mail kernel: program parted is using a deprecated SCSI ioctl, please convert it to SG_IO May 11 13:37:50 mail kernel: sym1:4:0:phase change 2-7 16@01b75f6
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00051.html (24,612 bytes)

9. Re: XFS on 2.4 Tib raid (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 10:17:16 -0500
I am using an ATTO scsi card speaking to an Infortrend 2.4 Tib raid system. Some system config settings: Distro: debian sarge Kernel: 2.6.11 (kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686) XFS: xfsprogs (2.6.28-1) Just
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00055.html (8,697 bytes)

10. Re: XFS on 2.4 Tib raid (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 23:14:17 +0200
Hi Eric We did not recompile the kernel per-se however in /boot/config-2.6.11-1-686 (other distros /proc/config.gz) under the Parallel IDE protocol modules CONFIG_LBD=y -- Leon
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00061.html (9,182 bytes)

11. Re: XFS on 2.4 Tib raid (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 10:40:02 +1000
..... Looks like binary file data in AG 30 and 31. Given that mkfs probably gave you 32 AGs in your filesystem, these 2 AGs are the only ones that lie totally above the 2TiB filesystem offset. From t
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00063.html (10,539 bytes)

12. Re: XFS on 2.4 Tib raid (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 07:10:49 +0200
Hi Dave I will do this, I tried mkfs.xfs -s size=1024 -f /dev/sdc1 and xfs_check returned the same info. I also tries size=2048 and size=4096, both with the same results Thanks -- Leon
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00066.html (11,078 bytes)

13. Re: XFS on 2.4 Tib raid (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 08:42:44 +0100
Not true anymore when using 16byte DCBs, which Linux 2.6 does.
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00067.html (9,191 bytes)

14. XFS on 2.4 Tib raid (score: 1)
Author: @xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 22:10:25 +0200
I am using an ATTO scsi card speaking to an Infortrend 2.4 Tib raid system. Some system config settings: Distro: debian sarge Kernel: 2.6.11 (kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686) XFS: xfsprogs (2.6.28-1) I cr
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00231.html (8,848 bytes)

15. Re: XFS on 2.4 Tib raid (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 09:10:55 +1000
What sort of data was being copied? What's the actual error? This is the stack trace that's part of the error message, but does not inidcate what the error was. Can you include the error messages tha
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00237.html (10,119 bytes)

16. Re: XFS on 2.4 Tib raid (score: 1)
Author: w@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 16:21:26 -0700
Does the combination of kernel, drivers and raid cards work reliably for volumes that large without wrapping? Some do not and when you write towards the end of large volumes you end up stomping on da
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00239.html (8,513 bytes)

17. Re: XFS on 2.4 Tib raid (score: 1)
Author: @xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 10:03:51 +0200
Hi Dave I am copying jpeg files 1-2mb in size. I include the full error from /var/log/messages. As one copies files it stops at some point and the following error loops and the machine needs to be re
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00241.html (12,058 bytes)

18. Re: XFS on 2.4 Tib raid (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 08:44:50 +1000
So you haven't created a partition table on the device at all? So we're trying to allocate an extent and the AGF read from disk is full of zeros. Can you do the following: - write a known pattern to
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00247.html (10,936 bytes)

19. Re: XFS on 2.4 Tib raid (score: 1)
Author: gc@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 07:27:34 +0200
Hi Dave No, however the device mounted 100% The reason we did not originally create a partition is that the fdisk utils could not address the 2.4 Tib device. It returned a size of 200Mb or something
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00248.html (12,246 bytes)

20. Re: XFS on 2.4 Tib raid (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 02:29:01 -0400
it's a limitation of the partition table format. use parted to create a EFI aka ia64 aka GPT partition table. eg. parted /dev/sda (parted) mklabel gpt (parted) mkpart primary 0 2384080 ... (parted) q
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00249.html (9,496 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu