- 1. XFS marries JFS (score: 1)
- Author: "Bernhard R. Erdmann" <be@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2001 18:18:02 +0200
- I just managed to apply the IBM patches for JFS to SGI's CVS checkout of linux-2.4.6-pre7-xfs. jfs-common-v1.0.0-patch applied with no errors, but jfs-2.4.5-v1.0.0-patch forced me using emacs instea
- /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00015.html (6,958 bytes)
- 2. Re: XFS marries JFS (score: 1)
- Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2001 21:07:38 +0200 (CEST)
- That's good news. Will take some before xfs apply's that cleanly. If you can put up the patch somewhere I'll add a link to the FAQ for people interested in getting both running for testing/benchmarke
- /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00023.html (7,870 bytes)
- 3. Re: XFS marries JFS (score: 1)
- Author: "Bernhard R. Erdmann" <be@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2001 21:50:06 +0200
- here it is... cd /usr/src/linux patch -p1 < /path/to/jfs-common-v1.0.0-patch patch -p1 < /path/to/jfs-2.4.5-v1.0.0-patch patch < /path/to/fs.h.4jfs.patch -- include/linux/fs.h.orig Thu Jun 14 10:08:
- /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00025.html (8,634 bytes)
- 4. Re: XFS marries JFS (score: 1)
- Author: Martin Spott <Martin.Spott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 09:28:17 +0200 (CEST)
- I'm running such a setup for several months already. This only works, because Steve Best added a little tweak upon my request to get this going because XFS modifies some type declaration that JFS de
- /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00047.html (8,055 bytes)
- 5. XFS marries JFS (score: 1)
- Author: xx>
- Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2001 18:18:02 +0200
- I just managed to apply the IBM patches for JFS to SGI's CVS checkout of linux-2.4.6-pre7-xfs. jfs-common-v1.0.0-patch applied with no errors, but jfs-2.4.5-v1.0.0-patch forced me using emacs instea
- /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01306.html (6,958 bytes)
- 6. Re: XFS marries JFS (score: 1)
- Author: xx>
- Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2001 21:07:38 +0200 (CEST)
- That's good news. Will take some before xfs apply's that cleanly. If you can put up the patch somewhere I'll add a link to the FAQ for people interested in getting both running for testing/benchmarke
- /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01314.html (7,870 bytes)
- 7. Re: XFS marries JFS (score: 1)
- Author: xx>
- Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2001 21:50:06 +0200
- here it is... cd /usr/src/linux patch -p1 < /path/to/jfs-common-v1.0.0-patch patch -p1 < /path/to/jfs-2.4.5-v1.0.0-patch patch < /path/to/fs.h.4jfs.patch -- include/linux/fs.h.orig Thu Jun 14 10:08:
- /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01316.html (8,634 bytes)
- 8. Re: XFS marries JFS (score: 1)
- Author: xx>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 09:28:17 +0200 (CEST)
- I'm running such a setup for several months already. This only works, because Steve Best added a little tweak upon my request to get this going because XFS modifies some type declaration that JFS de
- /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01338.html (8,055 bytes)
- 9. XFS marries JFS (score: 1)
- Author: "Bernhard R. Erdmann" <be@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2001 18:18:02 +0200
- Hi, I just managed to apply the IBM patches for JFS to SGI's CVS checkout of linux-2.4.6-pre7-xfs. jfs-common-v1.0.0-patch applied with no errors, but jfs-2.4.5-v1.0.0-patch forced me using emacs ins
- /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02597.html (6,958 bytes)
- 10. Re: XFS marries JFS (score: 1)
- Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2001 21:07:38 +0200 (CEST)
- That's good news. Will take some before xfs apply's that cleanly. If you can put up the patch somewhere I'll add a link to the FAQ for people interested in getting both running for testing/benchmarke
- /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02605.html (7,895 bytes)
- 11. Re: XFS marries JFS (score: 1)
- Author: "Bernhard R. Erdmann" <be@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2001 21:50:06 +0200
- here it is... cd /usr/src/linux patch -p1 < /path/to/jfs-common-v1.0.0-patch patch -p1 < /path/to/jfs-2.4.5-v1.0.0-patch patch < /path/to/fs.h.4jfs.patch -- include/linux/fs.h.orig Thu Jun 14 10:08:
- /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02607.html (8,683 bytes)
- 12. Re: XFS marries JFS (score: 1)
- Author: Martin Spott <Martin.Spott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 09:28:17 +0200 (CEST)
- I'm running such a setup for several months already. This only works, because Steve Best added a little tweak upon my request to get this going because XFS modifies some type declaration that JFS de
- /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02629.html (8,137 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu