Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+kernel\s+problem\s+with\s+lilo\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+kernel\s+problem\s+with\s+lilo\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. XFS kernel problem with lilo (score: 1): Author: Mark Tucker <tuckerm@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 11:56:30 -0400 (EDT); I have recently downloaded the Redhat SMP kernel pacakages (rpm) and xfs tools from oss.sgi.com. The packages installed without error. I created a ramdisk image from the new kernel and updated lilo w; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00555.html (7,787 bytes)
2. Re: XFS kernel problem with lilo (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 11:01:51 -0500; Use /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.2-SGI_XFS_1.0smp ^ not vmlinux... you might want to grab the 1.0.1 kernel as well, 1.0 is somewhat ancient at this point... -Eric; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00556.html (7,481 bytes)
3. Re: XFS kernel problem with lilo (score: 1): Author: Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 12:03:48 -0400 (EDT); ^ That's the uncompressed image. You need to use vmlinuz. Oh, and you should probably grab the 1.0.1 release -- there have been a lot of fixes. -- Joshua Baker-LePain Department of Biomedical Enginee; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00557.html (7,534 bytes)
4. Re: XFS kernel problem with lilo (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 11:03:05 -0500; First of all your timing was bad - 1.0.1 just came out, so there is a much more recent kernel out there in rpm format now. Secondly, you need to point lilo at the vmlinuz version of this file not th; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00558.html (8,902 bytes)
5. Re: XFS kernel problem with lilo (score: 1): Author: Mark Tucker <tuckerm@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 12:35:29 -0400 (EDT); Thanks to all who pointed that out, it should have been obvious. I now have a working 1.0 kernel. I'm in the middle of downloading it now. -- Mark Tucker GE Corporate Research and Development Unix S; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00562.html (8,052 bytes)
6. XFS kernel problem with lilo (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 11:56:30 -0400 (EDT); I have recently downloaded the Redhat SMP kernel pacakages (rpm) and xfs tools from oss.sgi.com. The packages installed without error. I created a ramdisk image from the new kernel and updated lilo w; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01846.html (7,787 bytes)
7. Re: XFS kernel problem with lilo (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 11:01:51 -0500; Use /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.2-SGI_XFS_1.0smp ^ not vmlinux... you might want to grab the 1.0.1 kernel as well, 1.0 is somewhat ancient at this point... -Eric; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01847.html (7,481 bytes)
8. Re: XFS kernel problem with lilo (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 12:03:48 -0400 (EDT); ^ That's the uncompressed image. You need to use vmlinuz. Oh, and you should probably grab the 1.0.1 release -- there have been a lot of fixes. -- Joshua Baker-LePain Department of Biomedical Enginee; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01848.html (7,534 bytes)
9. Re: XFS kernel problem with lilo (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 11:03:05 -0500; First of all your timing was bad - 1.0.1 just came out, so there is a much more recent kernel out there in rpm format now. Secondly, you need to point lilo at the vmlinuz version of this file not th; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01849.html (8,902 bytes)
10. Re: XFS kernel problem with lilo (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 12:35:29 -0400 (EDT); Thanks to all who pointed that out, it should have been obvious. I now have a working 1.0 kernel. I'm in the middle of downloading it now. -- Mark Tucker GE Corporate Research and Development Unix S; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01853.html (8,052 bytes)
11. XFS kernel problem with lilo (score: 1): Author: Mark Tucker <tuckerm@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 11:56:30 -0400 (EDT); I have recently downloaded the Redhat SMP kernel pacakages (rpm) and xfs tools from oss.sgi.com. The packages installed without error. I created a ramdisk image from the new kernel and updated lilo w; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg03137.html (7,787 bytes)
12. Re: XFS kernel problem with lilo (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 11:01:51 -0500; Use /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.2-SGI_XFS_1.0smp ^ not vmlinux... you might want to grab the 1.0.1 kernel as well, 1.0 is somewhat ancient at this point... -Eric; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg03138.html (7,556 bytes)
13. Re: XFS kernel problem with lilo (score: 1): Author: Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 12:03:48 -0400 (EDT); ^ That's the uncompressed image. You need to use vmlinuz. Oh, and you should probably grab the 1.0.1 release -- there have been a lot of fixes. -- Joshua Baker-LePain Department of Biomedical Enginee; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg03139.html (7,609 bytes)
14. Re: XFS kernel problem with lilo (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 11:03:05 -0500; First of all your timing was bad - 1.0.1 just came out, so there is a much more recent kernel out there in rpm format now. Secondly, you need to point lilo at the vmlinuz version of this file not th; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg03140.html (9,019 bytes)
15. Re: XFS kernel problem with lilo (score: 1): Author: Mark Tucker <tuckerm@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 12:35:29 -0400 (EDT); Thanks to all who pointed that out, it should have been obvious. I now have a working 1.0 kernel. I'm in the middle of downloading it now. -- Mark Tucker GE Corporate Research and Development Unix S; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg03144.html (8,100 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]