Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+internal\s+error\s+xfs_btree_check_lblock\s*$/: 36 ]

Total 36 documents matching your query.

1. XFS internal error xfs_btree_check_lblock (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:55:52 +0200
this FS error occurred on an openSUSE 10.3 64 bit, with all openSUSE updates. xfsprogs is xfsprogs-2.9.4-17.1 . The filesystem with the error is our /home, on an Areca ARC-1220 RAID Controller, 6 Hi
/archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00270.html (43,316 bytes)

2. Re: XFS internal error xfs_btree_check_lblock (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 13:08:22 +1000
Hi Richard, this looks like XFS b-tree corruption of some sort. We have some patches that should help here. The patches are being back-ported to SLES10 and should also apply to OpenSUSE. We should ha
/archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00271.html (45,639 bytes)

3. Re: XFS internal error xfs_btree_check_lblock (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 11:36:01 -0500 (CDT)
(oops this time to the list) Mark, are these corruptions that are already fixed upstream? Any pointers to the commits if so, or bugs/reviews if not? Thanks, -Eric
/archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00273.html (9,322 bytes)

4. Re: XFS internal error xfs_btree_check_lblock (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:33:39 +0200
Mark Goodwin wrote: Hi Richard, this looks like XFS b-tree corruption of some sort. We have some patches that should help here. The patches are being back-ported to SLES10 and should also apply to Op
/archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00293.html (9,902 bytes)

5. Re: XFS internal error xfs_btree_check_lblock (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:06:49 -0500
Mark Goodwin wrote: Hi Richard, this looks like XFS b-tree corruption of some sort. We have some patches that should help here. The patches are being back-ported to SLES10 and should also apply to Op
/archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00311.html (45,894 bytes)

6. Re: XFS internal error xfs_btree_check_lblock (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:11:19 -0500
This *is* the developer mailing list, and I am honestly a bit frustrated that said bugs & patches are not being aired & reviewed in public, honestly. -Eric
/archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00312.html (9,872 bytes)

7. Re: XFS internal error xfs_btree_check_lblock (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 09:40:12 +1000
Eric Sandeen wrote: Richard Ems wrote: Mark Goodwin wrote: Hi Richard, this looks like XFS b-tree corruption of some sort. We have some patches that should help here. The patches are being back-porte
/archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00317.html (12,102 bytes)

8. Re: XFS internal error xfs_btree_check_lblock (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:07:31 -0500
Great. From your earlier reply I had the impression that they were patches still internal to SGI - which of course SGI has every right to do, but patch reviews have the potential to be better if more
/archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00320.html (11,532 bytes)

9. Re: XFS internal error xfs_btree_check_lblock (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 13:24:28 +1000
http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00122.html http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00209.html http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00231.html http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-
/archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00326.html (48,263 bytes)

10. Re: XFS internal error xfs_btree_check_lblock (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:49:18 +0200
Mark Goodwin wrote: Some of the above might not refer directly to the final committed patches but the thread URLs should be accurate. These are bug fixes that go a long way back and really do need to
/archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00351.html (10,137 bytes)

11. Re: XFS internal error xfs_btree_check_lblock (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 21:27:33 +1000
Richard Ems wrote: Mark Goodwin wrote: Some of the above might not refer directly to the final committed patches but the thread URLs should be accurate. These are bug fixes that go a long way back an
/archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00355.html (11,674 bytes)

12. Re: XFS internal error xfs_btree_check_lblock (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:22:40 -0500
Nor even shipped with RHEL. But hopefully the CentOS guys will pick it up, I'll give them a heads up when the list of fixes appears. Thanks, -Eric
/archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00357.html (9,864 bytes)

13. XFS internal error xfs_btree_check_lblock (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:55:52 +0200
this FS error occurred on an openSUSE 10.3 64 bit, with all openSUSE updates. xfsprogs is xfsprogs-2.9.4-17.1 . The filesystem with the error is our /home, on an Areca ARC-1220 RAID Controller, 6 Hi
/archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00893.html (43,316 bytes)

14. Re: XFS internal error xfs_btree_check_lblock (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 13:08:22 +1000
Hi Richard, this looks like XFS b-tree corruption of some sort. We have some patches that should help here. The patches are being back-ported to SLES10 and should also apply to OpenSUSE. We should ha
/archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00894.html (45,639 bytes)

15. Re: XFS internal error xfs_btree_check_lblock (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 11:36:01 -0500 (CDT)
(oops this time to the list) Mark, are these corruptions that are already fixed upstream? Any pointers to the commits if so, or bugs/reviews if not? Thanks, -Eric
/archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00896.html (9,322 bytes)

16. Re: XFS internal error xfs_btree_check_lblock (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:33:39 +0200
Mark Goodwin wrote: Hi Richard, this looks like XFS b-tree corruption of some sort. We have some patches that should help here. The patches are being back-ported to SLES10 and should also apply to Op
/archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00916.html (9,902 bytes)

17. Re: XFS internal error xfs_btree_check_lblock (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:06:49 -0500
Mark Goodwin wrote: Hi Richard, this looks like XFS b-tree corruption of some sort. We have some patches that should help here. The patches are being back-ported to SLES10 and should also apply to Op
/archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00934.html (45,894 bytes)

18. Re: XFS internal error xfs_btree_check_lblock (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:11:19 -0500
This *is* the developer mailing list, and I am honestly a bit frustrated that said bugs & patches are not being aired & reviewed in public, honestly. -Eric
/archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00935.html (9,872 bytes)

19. Re: XFS internal error xfs_btree_check_lblock (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 09:40:12 +1000
Eric Sandeen wrote: Richard Ems wrote: Mark Goodwin wrote: Hi Richard, this looks like XFS b-tree corruption of some sort. We have some patches that should help here. The patches are being back-porte
/archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00940.html (12,102 bytes)

20. Re: XFS internal error xfs_btree_check_lblock (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:07:31 -0500
Great. From your earlier reply I had the impression that they were patches still internal to SGI - which of course SGI has every right to do, but patch reviews have the potential to be better if more
/archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00943.html (11,532 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu