Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+installer\s+for\s+Fedora\s+1\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+installer\s+for\s+Fedora\s+1\s*$/: 58 ]

Total 58 documents matching your query.

1. Re: XFS installer for Fedora 1 (score: 1): Author: Mike Burger <mburger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 11:21:08 -0500 (EST); Touching back on this subject: Has anyone tried upgrading a current RH/FC system, that already has XFS in place, with the stock FC2 CDs? -- Mike Burger http://www.bubbanfriends.org Visit the Dog Poun; /archives/xfs/2004-07/msg00074.html (9,361 bytes)
2. Re: XFS installer for Fedora 1 (score: 1): Author: Jameel Akari <jakari@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:44:38 -0400 (EDT); Well, i can tell you that FC2 kernels supports xfs - however they don't install any xfsprogs (mkfs.xfs, xfsdump, etc.) or acl stuff - and the installer won't create XFS partitions - just ext2,ext3. O; /archives/xfs/2004-07/msg00075.html (10,729 bytes)
3. Re: XFS installer for Fedora 1 (score: 1): Author: "L. Friedman" <netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 11:50:10 -0500 (EST); That wasn't my experience (and what's an 'XFS partition')? FC2 installs with XFS ok, as long as /boot isn't XFS. When it is, grub gets caught somewhere and kinda hangs until you kill it manually duri; /archives/xfs/2004-07/msg00076.html (11,181 bytes)
4. Re: XFS installer for Fedora 1 (score: 1): Author: Jameel Akari <jakari@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 13:07:37 -0400 (EDT); It's typo, mostly, obviously I meant "filesystem," I'm just thinking of the installer's Disk Druid partitioning at the same time. I certainly don't have much faith in it, hence the test system. The i; /archives/xfs/2004-07/msg00077.html (9,855 bytes)
5. Re: XFS installer for Fedora 1 (score: 1): Author: Mike Burger <mburger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:49:19 -0500 (EST); Well, since Disk Druid, fdisk, et al still refer to the process as partitioning the disk, I don't think the term is really all that inappropropriate. I use the term, myself, all the time. But that co; /archives/xfs/2004-07/msg00078.html (10,350 bytes)
6. Re: XFS installer for Fedora 1 (score: 1): Author: "L. Friedman" <netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 13:06:03 -0500 (EST); Yea, but partitioning is a verb, partition types are Linux (83) and that's about it. Its all symantics :) -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Lonni J Friedman ne; /archives/xfs/2004-07/msg00079.html (10,632 bytes)
7. Re: XFS installer for Fedora 1 (score: 1): Author: Ludek Finstrle <ludek.finstrle@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 20:59:19 +0200; Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 12:44:38PM -0400, Jameel Akari napsal(a): Are you sure? When setup ask for kernel (in text) I add xfs as latest parameter and it works as I expect. Something like: boot: linux te; /archives/xfs/2004-07/msg00080.html (9,989 bytes)
8. Re: XFS installer for Fedora 1 (score: 1): Author: Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 19:06:39 +0200; Have you tried booting with "linux xfs"? The latter is fun, I guess. Anyone volunteering ;) (RH7.3 to FC2 would be a disaster even w/o XFS I guess, too many versions in between. But FC1->FC2 could ha; /archives/xfs/2004-07/msg00081.html (11,866 bytes)
9. Re: XFS installer for Fedora 1 (score: 1): Author: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:25:16 +1000; I went RH9 -> FC1 -> FC2 with no problems. The systems were already using XFS partitions. AFAICR other users had problems with grub on XFS in FC2, but I use lilo so who cares :); /archives/xfs/2004-07/msg00093.html (8,146 bytes)
10. Re: XFS installer for Fedora 1 (score: 1): Author: Mike Burger <mburger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:27:15 -0500 (EST); The system in question also uses LILO and the /boot filesystem is ext2, so Grub wouldn't really be an issue in either case, as far as I know. -- Mike Burger http://www.bubbanfriends.org Visit the Dog; /archives/xfs/2004-07/msg00108.html (9,140 bytes)
11. Re: XFS installer for Fedora 1 (score: 1): Author: Mike Burger <mburger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 11:21:08 -0500 (EST); Touching back on this subject: Has anyone tried upgrading a current RH/FC system, that already has XFS in place, with the stock FC2 CDs? -- Mike Burger http://www.bubbanfriends.org Visit the Dog Poun; /archives/xfs/2004-07/msg00292.html (9,361 bytes)
12. Re: XFS installer for Fedora 1 (score: 1): Author: Jameel Akari <jakari@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:44:38 -0400 (EDT); Well, i can tell you that FC2 kernels supports xfs - however they don't install any xfsprogs (mkfs.xfs, xfsdump, etc.) or acl stuff - and the installer won't create XFS partitions - just ext2,ext3. O; /archives/xfs/2004-07/msg00293.html (10,729 bytes)
13. Re: XFS installer for Fedora 1 (score: 1): Author: "L. Friedman" <netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 11:50:10 -0500 (EST); That wasn't my experience (and what's an 'XFS partition')? FC2 installs with XFS ok, as long as /boot isn't XFS. When it is, grub gets caught somewhere and kinda hangs until you kill it manually duri; /archives/xfs/2004-07/msg00294.html (11,181 bytes)
14. Re: XFS installer for Fedora 1 (score: 1): Author: Jameel Akari <jakari@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 13:07:37 -0400 (EDT); It's typo, mostly, obviously I meant "filesystem," I'm just thinking of the installer's Disk Druid partitioning at the same time. I certainly don't have much faith in it, hence the test system. The i; /archives/xfs/2004-07/msg00295.html (9,855 bytes)
15. Re: XFS installer for Fedora 1 (score: 1): Author: Mike Burger <mburger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:49:19 -0500 (EST); Well, since Disk Druid, fdisk, et al still refer to the process as partitioning the disk, I don't think the term is really all that inappropropriate. I use the term, myself, all the time. But that co; /archives/xfs/2004-07/msg00296.html (10,350 bytes)
16. Re: XFS installer for Fedora 1 (score: 1): Author: "L. Friedman" <netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 13:06:03 -0500 (EST); Yea, but partitioning is a verb, partition types are Linux (83) and that's about it. Its all symantics :) -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Lonni J Friedman ne; /archives/xfs/2004-07/msg00297.html (10,632 bytes)
17. Re: XFS installer for Fedora 1 (score: 1): Author: Ludek Finstrle <ludek.finstrle@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 20:59:19 +0200; Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 12:44:38PM -0400, Jameel Akari napsal(a): Are you sure? When setup ask for kernel (in text) I add xfs as latest parameter and it works as I expect. Something like: boot: linux te; /archives/xfs/2004-07/msg00298.html (9,989 bytes)
18. Re: XFS installer for Fedora 1 (score: 1): Author: Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 19:06:39 +0200; Have you tried booting with "linux xfs"? The latter is fun, I guess. Anyone volunteering ;) (RH7.3 to FC2 would be a disaster even w/o XFS I guess, too many versions in between. But FC1->FC2 could ha; /archives/xfs/2004-07/msg00299.html (11,866 bytes)
19. Re: XFS installer for Fedora 1 (score: 1): Author: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:25:16 +1000; I went RH9 -> FC1 -> FC2 with no problems. The systems were already using XFS partitions. AFAICR other users had problems with grub on XFS in FC2, but I use lilo so who cares :); /archives/xfs/2004-07/msg00311.html (8,146 bytes)
20. Re: XFS installer for Fedora 1 (score: 1): Author: Mike Burger <mburger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:27:15 -0500 (EST); The system in question also uses LILO and the /boot filesystem is ext2, so Grub wouldn't really be an issue in either case, as far as I know. -- Mike Burger http://www.bubbanfriends.org Visit the Dog; /archives/xfs/2004-07/msg00326.html (9,140 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]