Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+fs\s+size\s+limit\?\s*$/: 32 ]

Total 32 documents matching your query.

1. XFS fs size limit? (score: 1)
Author: yocum@xxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2001 11:18:06 -0500
Hi all, I asked this of mkp but he doesn't know off the top of his head: is there a limit to the XFS fs size? I've tried creating one on just over 1.1TB with no success: [root@sdssdp6 /]# fdisk -l /d
/archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00019.html (9,071 bytes)

2. Re: XFS fs size limit? (score: 1)
Author: yocum@xxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2001 12:13:03 -0500
<snip> Seth suggested that I get the TOT cmds and try mkfs.xfs with that. I did, it worked. Hopefully, I won't run into the problem Jani had a couple weeks ago with FS freezes. I'll let you know if I
/archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00048.html (8,293 bytes)

3. Re: XFS fs size limit? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2001 12:34:12 -0500
The freeze was a raid5 specific thing, and the only way out of it at this kernel revision is to use an external log device with raid5. You must also make sure to use an inode size larger than the de
/archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00053.html (9,557 bytes)

4. Re: XFS fs size limit? (score: 1)
Author: yocum@xxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2001 13:05:42 -0500
I assume you mean software RAID5, right? I've got a RAID50 array: 2 8-port 3ware cards in hw raid5, then those two devices combined software raid0. I didn't bother to make the log on a separate devi
/archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00056.html (9,983 bytes)

5. Re: XFS fs size limit? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2001 13:25:28 -0500
Yes, software raid5, this should not be an issue for hardware raid - unless it is broken.... Steve
/archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00058.html (10,043 bytes)

6. Re: XFS fs size limit? (score: 1)
Author: Seth Mos <seth@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2001 22:48:50 +0200
I assume you mean software RAID5, right? I've got a RAID50 array: 2 8-port 3ware cards in hw raid5, then those two devices combined software raid0. I didn't bother to make the log on a separate devic
/archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00069.html (10,918 bytes)

7. Re: XFS fs size limit? (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Wolfe" <nw@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2001 15:00:42 -0600
raid0. I need be. the (snip) If Personally, I'd bet on a drive or two going out before the controller. I haven't had any sort of drive controller (IDE/SCSI/RAID) go out in nearly a decade, but I've
/archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00073.html (9,364 bytes)

8. Re: XFS fs size limit? (score: 1)
Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2001 23:29:52 +0200
ifneed be. (snip) Personally, I'd bet on a drive or two going out before the controller. I haven't had any sort of drive controller (IDE/SCSI/RAID) go out in nearly a decade, but I've had plenty of d
/archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00074.html (11,256 bytes)

9. Re: XFS fs size limit? (score: 1)
Author: Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2001 08:01:33 +0200
from mobile.sauter-bc.com (unknown [10.1.6.21]) by basel1.sauter-bc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAA7157306; Fri, 3 Aug 2001 08:01:33 +0200 (CEST) Cc: yocum@xxxxxxxx, xfs-list <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
/archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00089.html (11,665 bytes)

10. Re: XFS fs size limit? (score: 1)
Author: Derek Glidden <dglidden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2001 11:39:37 -0400
Not to try to drag this conversation even more off-topic than it already is, but I'm finding this talk about the potential of 3ware cards or drives going out and losing big important RAID devices and
/archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00111.html (11,242 bytes)

11. Re: XFS fs size limit? (score: 1)
Author: Andrew Klaassen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2001 11:58:24 -0400
It sounds like it'd be a perfect conversation for the linux-ide-arrays list... ;) Andrew Klaassen
/archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00114.html (9,080 bytes)

12. Re: XFS fs size limit? (score: 1)
Author: yocum@xxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2001 14:07:41 -0500
<yocum points over to the drbd/failsafe mailing lists> ;-) This is definitely a more likely senario. But, even in the event that we lose 50% of our data, we're still 100% screwed, so I might as well
/archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00127.html (11,237 bytes)

13. Re: XFS fs size limit? (score: 1)
Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2001 00:14:13 +0200 (CEST)
That's good :-) It's cheap, large, reliable, not fast and you can store lot's of MP3 on it. It's more a University thing or used in cheap nas appliances were it will do nice things since the 100Mbit
/archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00128.html (10,042 bytes)

14. Re: XFS fs size limit? (score: 1)
Author: Ragnar Kj°rstad <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2001 00:26:12 +0200
Yes, we have. But this is getting awfully offtopic. -- Ragnar Kjorstad Big Storage
/archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00130.html (9,694 bytes)

15. Re: XFS fs size limit? (score: 1)
Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2001 00:32:07 +0200 (CEST)
yada yada. I've got 2 really big magnets and a pointy stick. Write caching off thr IDE drive? That's good to hear, but they won't be cheap in the netherlands. I have not owned a 3ware card ever, but
/archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00131.html (8,654 bytes)

16. Re: XFS fs size limit? (score: 1)
Author: Derek Glidden <dglidden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2001 19:04:23 -0400
Oh hey, don't get me wrong, I think the 3ware cards are seriously hep. I've got big-time hardware envy over the ones we're playing with at work. (watch this nice transition...) I want one at home so
/archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00133.html (9,768 bytes)

17. CVS and missing files (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2001 11:18:06 -0500
tz Lehmann wrote: Hi Constantin No sharp drop. That the elapsed time is reduced by the volume size is very interessting. On the 512MB volume it's only half of the 4GB volume
/archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00909.html (9,071 bytes)

18. S 1.0.1 ISO installer (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2001 12:13:03 -0500
o this does NOT happen with either stock Red Hat or XFS 1.0? Not sure what might be causing this... Sorry for not providing more information. It does NOT happen with XFS 1.
/archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00938.html (8,293 bytes)

19. S 1.0.1 ISO installer (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2001 12:34:12 -0500
s@xxxxxxxxxxx> References: <2
/archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00943.html (9,557 bytes)

20. d under heavy XFS use (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2001 13:05:42 -0500
script. Steve
/archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00946.html (9,983 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu