Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+for\s+Linux\s+1\.0\.1\s+Released\s*$/: 96 ]

Total 96 documents matching your query.

1. XFS for Linux 1.0.1 Released (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 16:03:36 -0500
SGI is pleased to announce the 1.0.1 release of XFS for Linux. The web pages will be updated in a short while, but in the meantime, files are available under ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/R
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00384.html (10,769 bytes)

2. Re: XFS for Linux 1.0.1 Released (score: 1)
Author: Florin Andrei <florin@xxxxxxx>
Date: 10 Jul 2001 14:59:55 -0700
That's great news! Guys, can you please make the floppy images available, so one does not have to download the entire ISO just to test the new floppies. -- Florin Andrei
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00387.html (8,263 bytes)

3. Re: XFS for Linux 1.0.1 Released (score: 1)
Author: "D. Stimits" <stimits@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 16:58:03 -0600
What I'd find more interesting (since floppy images can't work with some of the possible kernel options...size gets too large) would be an ISO CD image that is equivalent to Tom's Root Boot (rescue w
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00389.html (9,495 bytes)

4. Re: XFS for Linux 1.0.1 Released (score: 1)
Author: "Gerard W. Patterson" <gerry.patterson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:56:45 -0600
Interestingly enough, this is exactly what I am working on for my current project. It is currently based on a 2.4.5 kernel with the xfs patch applied. (I started this a week and a bit ago and we are
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00390.html (10,833 bytes)

5. Re: XFS for Linux 1.0.1 Released (score: 1)
Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 23:17:10 -0500
Did you look in? projects/xfs/download/Release-1.0.1/installer/RH7.1-SGI-XFS-1.0.1/images -- Russell Cattelan cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00394.html (9,451 bytes)

6. Re: XFS for Linux 1.0.1 Released (score: 1)
Author: "D. Stimits" <stimits@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 00:10:18 -0600
If you use a 2.4.5 kernel, or 2.4.6-pre1, be sure to manually add one patch...without this patch there are some serious problems under various circumstances, all of which are fatal. In kernel tree, f
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00400.html (12,411 bytes)

7. Re: XFS for Linux 1.0.1 Released (score: 1)
Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 08:53:07 +0200
What I'd find more interesting (since floppy images can't work with some of the possible kernel options...size gets too large) would be an ISO CD image that is equivalent to Tom's Root Boot (rescue w
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00403.html (10,487 bytes)

8. Re: XFS for Linux 1.0.1 Released (score: 1)
Author: "D. Stimits" <stimits@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 03:04:20 -0600
This seems rather interesting, I can see how it might prove incredibly flexible. I am curious about something (I did not download it yet)...it uses a compressed filesystem. What form of compression i
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00410.html (11,749 bytes)

9. Re: XFS for Linux 1.0.1 Released (score: 1)
Author: Jan-Frode Myklebust <janfrode@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 10:54:29 +0200
I'm trying to get this installed on a Dell PowerEdge 4400, and am having some problems. I never could get the XFS-1.0 release into this, so it's a standard RH 7.1 system at the moment. http://www.del
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00411.html (10,125 bytes)

10. Re: XFS for Linux 1.0.1 Released (score: 1)
Author: "D. Stimits" <stimits@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 03:13:07 -0600
Don't trust rpm to update the kernel. Run rpm -i on the source rpm, then get the tarball out of /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/, do a cp -adpR on whatever subdir it is to the usual /usr/src/ location after
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00412.html (11,711 bytes)

11. Re: XFS for Linux 1.0.1 Released (score: 1)
Author: Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 11:32:07 +0200
from mobile.sauter-bc.com (unknown [10.1.6.21]) by basel1.sauter-bc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BD5357306; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 11:41:15 +0200 (CEST) Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx Organization: Sauter AG,
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00413.html (12,801 bytes)

12. Re: XFS for Linux 1.0.1 Released (score: 1)
Author: "Ries van Twisk" <ries@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 12:11:43 +0200
I have paches for the raid controllers. Currently it's runing for 14 day's now without problems. I also applied the XFS patch to the Linux 2.4.5 kernel. It all compiles fine now. It's not tested on m
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00415.html (9,324 bytes)

13. Re: XFS for Linux 1.0.1 Released (score: 1)
Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 12:56:17 +0200
At 12:11 11-7-2001 +0200, Ries van Twisk wrote: I have paches for the raid controllers. Currently it's runing for 14 day's now without problems. The problem is not really with the raid hardware itsel
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00416.html (10,626 bytes)

14. Re: XFS for Linux 1.0.1 Released (score: 1)
Author: "Ries van Twisk" <ries@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 13:18:40 +0200
Th only problem with data curruption are the access database file but that is really a Samba problem. So far no problem found. But my system runs under low loads about 25 Samba users on a 10Mb netwo
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00417.html (10,373 bytes)

15. Re: XFS for Linux 1.0.1 Released (score: 1)
Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 13:56:47 +0200
Th only problem with data curruption are the access database file but that is really a Samba problem. So far no problem found. But my system runs under low loads about 25 Samba users on a 10Mb networ
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00418.html (11,482 bytes)

16. Re: XFS for Linux 1.0.1 Released (score: 1)
Author: Jan-Frode Myklebust <janfrode@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 14:27:50 +0200
Of course it had to be a stupid mistake like that when I finally tried to get help.. Thanks, and thanks for the monitor-scripts. -jf
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00419.html (9,414 bytes)

17. Re: XFS for Linux 1.0.1 Released (score: 1)
Author: "Ries van Twisk" <ries@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 14:29:18 +0200
(We are going a bit off topic here....) It's a Debian distro with gg verion 2.95.2, this version always worked for me. Is there any real good reason to upgrade to 2.95.3? I'll see what I can do but t
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00420.html (9,425 bytes)

18. Re: XFS for Linux 1.0.1 Released (score: 1)
Author: jtrostel@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 10:36:33 -0400 (EDT)
Snip... Samba 2.2.1 expects libacl.a to be in /usr/lib and expects acl.h to be in /usr/include/sys. These are the same places that the bestbits ACL stuff goes and the detection and use of the ACL cod
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00427.html (10,503 bytes)

19. Re: XFS for Linux 1.0.1 Released (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 10:08:47 -0500
Whoa... at that point, why use RPM? :) If you want to rebuild the kernel, just install the kernel-source RPM, and build it from /usr/src/linux-2.4 RPM kernel upgrades have always worked fine for me,
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00430.html (10,216 bytes)

20. Re: XFS for Linux 1.0.1 Released (score: 1)
Author: "D. Stimits" <stimits@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 14:43:29 -0600
That's basically what I said, rpm -i...but I didn't realize installing the source rpm to the kernel actually placed it in /usr/src/? I assume it'd have to be copied from /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/somet
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00442.html (10,971 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu